Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro) header
Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro) profile picture

I am quite short; but I make up for it with my passion for agronomy, precision agtech & Saskatchewan. PAg. CCA. Agronomist. LSCI. SK Aerial Ag Ltd

Swift Current, Saskatchewan
Joined March 2009
Photo by Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro)Photo by Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro)Photo by Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro)Photo by Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro)Photo by Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro)Photo by Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro)Photo by Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro)Photo by Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro)Photo by Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro)Photo by Katie Carefoot (@pintsizedagro)
Happy #CdnAgDay. Proud to be involved in this industry and raising a kid that will appreciate and care for the environment and the lifestyle we are fortunate enough to have.
2
32
I think the saying is a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow… But maybe it’s Proline Gold? Well, it is today anyways. @Bayer4CropsCA #canola #aerialapplication
1
1
10
1,592
Katie Carefoot retweeted
Let’s talk about pesticides. Because this debate is going off the rails. Yes - pesticides can have environmental and health impacts. Of course they can. Every biologically active substance does. But what people don’t tell you is that risk is not about presence. It’s about dose, exposure, and context. And that’s where the conversation tends to fall apart. We are incredibly good today at detecting chemicals at vanishingly small concentrations. But detection is not danger. In Europe, pesticide residues in food are typically well below established safety thresholds, often by large margins, even under worst-case exposure scenarios. Yet the public discussion rarely distinguishes between: hazard (what something could do in extreme conditions), and risk (what it actually does under real-world exposure). Those are not the same thing. Now let’s address the elephant in the room. “If pesticides are safe, why is there so much controversy?” Simple: uncertainty + perception + trade-offs. Scientific studies do not always agree. Consumers strongly associate “synthetic” with “danger,” regardless of measured risk. Media narratives tend to amplify hazard rather than exposure. That combination is powerful. But here’s the part that is almost always missing. Modern agriculture depends on crop protection. Without it: yields drop crop losses increase farming systems change fundamentally and some practices (like regenerative agriculture) become much harder to maintain. There are trade-offs here that don’t fit into a headline. So where does that leave us? Do pesticides have downsides? Yes. Are some uses problematic? Also yes. Should we continuously improve regulation, monitoring, and alternatives? Absolutely. But reducing the entire discussion to “chemicals = danger” is not science. It’s a shortcut. The real question isn’t: “Are pesticides harmful?” Everything can be, under the wrong conditions. The real question is: Compared to what? Compared to: lower yields higher land use increased mycotoxins or less predictable food supply That’s the actual decision space. We don’t have a “pesticide problem.” We have a risk literacy problem. And until we fix that, we’ll keep arguing about the wrong thing.
38
72
7
291
10,014
The best 👌
A Canadian delight, Big Turk bar’s roots go back centuries nationalpost.com/entertainme…
1
4
1,063
Chickpeas, you’re the reason we can’t have nice things. Ha 🫠 2nd pass fung today, fingers crossed we can keep ahead of this. #canthaveitall #ascochyta #cdcleader
2
10
2,857
SK Climate Outlook June 25, 2026 | Lentil Anthracnose risk map is in from @ukkoag. View chickpea Ascochyta and climate maps + commentary from @AgronomistSPG: ow.ly/Apl150Zh4cB
1
1
307
SK Climate Outlook June 25, 2026 | Chickpea Ascochyta risk map is in from @ukkoag. View lentil Anthracnose and climate maps + commentary from @AgronomistSPG: ow.ly/zPUN50Zh5Mi
2
1
538
Jiminis are closing rows really quick, gotta get some Delaro on soon. ✈️
1
1
19
2,298
Earliest flowering canola finding threshold level cabbage seed pod weevils, 20 - 45 per 10 sweeps. Not as bad as last year’s insanely high numbers, where we didn’t even really need to count ha.
1
8
1,840
Katie Carefoot retweeted
Know someone going into ag at the U of S? Share this. They could receive $5,000 through the Barrett Rankin Memorial Scholarship. Apply by July 1, 2026. bit.ly/4dzL32d
2
2
454
Even though it’s been a challenging spray season, and not typical “good” Liberty conditions - the high humidity has been helping us big time! So satisfying seeing this great weed control. Also really glad we added Crimson into the tank to really cook the kochia 👍 @Flad02
2
1
25
5,172
A farm kids Sunday funday. Checking crops and chasing pronghorns.
12
690
Feeling pretty fortunate that I’ve actually had to use these boots so much this year already. Getting May and early June rains is just the best.
2
279
Sure is a lambs quarters year this year. Seeing piles of it everywhere!
2
413
My Christmas present from @CarefootScott is really delighting me this spring. Dude sure knows what an agronomist wants.
2
5
487
Well that’s reassuring.
1
11
728
After the 4th one I dug up on this field checking germ, sure glad we used Equento here! @syngentacanada @jetLeighh
1
4
11
2,640
Katie Carefoot retweeted
Ramazzini flies under the radar and is the main driver of the 5B$ litigation industry in the US. It manipulates the public, maligns good products, and silently maneuvers all of us like chess pieces on an invisible board. Via @GeneticLiteracy geneticliteracyproject.org/2… – at Calgary, Alberta
10
9
2,546
I have some opinions about cabbage seed pod weevil at threshold.
10
574