i write | creator @1win @surgence_io | just doing my thing | check highlights
Anon
Joined August 2023
- Tweets38.5K
- Following3.2K
- Followers8.9K
- Likes99.3K
Pinned Tweet
𝗜’𝘃𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝗰𝗿𝘆𝗽𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮𝘀 𝗜 𝘄𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗜 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗱𝗼 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵
Sometimes you have conviction in certain tokens, but what if you could turn that research into something you build with others?
Yh that’s why I’m looking into @PoiseFinance.
Turn your thesis into a token, bring people who share your vision together, and compete on the leaderboard while sharing in the fees.
I’m curious to see how far a strong thesis and the right crew can go.
Who’s building?
Conviction Tokens. Anywhere, anytime.
Beta access: 27th October
Join groups, add friends, get beta codes, earn fees.
poise.finance/campaign
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
today i have not really talk about
project sphere and here is what i found
so basically there’s something compelling about entering a world while its biggest possibilities are still unknown.
@projectspherexy starts with cells and energy, but the real appeal is seeing how those simple foundations can develop into a much larger civilization.
every early participant becomes part of the first chapter, before the ecosystem has reached its full potential.
project sphere is not just showing the destination; it is making the journey part of the experience.
good to have discover them on @rarelistio
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
One thing I don't want from the agent economy:
❌️ LinkedIn for bots.
❌️ A polished profile.
❌️ A few impressive claims.
“Top AI researcher.”
“Elite trading agent; 99% reliable.”
But where's the evidence?
@termix_ai is taking a different approach by making an agent's economic history part of its identity.
✔️Jobs completed.
✔️Payments settled.
✔️Challenges.
✔️Reputation.
All tied back to an on-chain agent identity.
That changes the question from:
“What does this agent claim it can do?”
to:
“What has this agent actually done?”
That distinction sounds small now.
It probably won't be when autonomous agents are moving real money between each other.
#AIagents #AI
One thing I find interesting about the TermiX model is how it treats agent reputation.
Most AI agents can tell you what they’re capable of.
A profile can say an agent is good at research, coding, trading, data analysis or whatever else.
But a claim on its own doesn’t mean much.
What if an agent’s reputation came from the work it actually completed?
That’s the direction @TermiX takes with its ".agent" identity.
The identity is owned by the agent’s wallet, while its history can build around actual economic activity; jobs taken, work delivered, challenges raised and settlements completed.
That changes the meaning of reputation.
Instead of:
“Trust this agent because its profile says it’s good.”
It becomes closer to:
“Here’s the work this agent has done, and here’s the onchain record behind it.”
I think that distinction becomes increasingly important as agents start doing more valuable work for one another.
If an agent is going to manage a treasury, perform research, run an audit, execute a strategy or provide infrastructure to another agent, you need more than a nice description.
You need a track record.
And ideally, that track record should be difficult to fake.
That’s one of the parts of TermiX I’ll be watching more closely as I continue exploring the platform.
The bigger question for me is whether this kind of verifiable economic history can become a real reputation layer for the agent economy.
#Agent #AIagents #TermiX
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
The 1win Token Sale just got more exciting! Every full $100 spent earns a Lucky Drive ticket, and the draw happens on November 15.
Who’s ready for the ride? @1win
Buy 1win Tokens and get tickets to win a Lamborghini Urus SE in 1win Lucky Drive
Until October 30, every full $100 spent during the Token Sale gives you 1 Lucky Drive ticket
Maximum: 32 tickets per user total, including tickets you already earned in Lucky Drive
Already bought 1win Tokens? Those purchases count too
To qualify:
- Buy tokens at 1wintoken.com
- Register or log in to 1win.com
- Make a $10+ SOL deposit from the same wallet you used for the Token Sale
The draw takes place on November 15
Available to both new and existing 1win players
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
Imagine you have a Steam gift card to sell and you already know where you usually trade it
You might be tempted to open your regular trading app and sell immediately because you need the money
But have you ever stopped to ask yourself if you’re getting a good rate?
That’s something every gift card trader should think about
Another thing I consider when choosing a trading platform is whether it supports the cards I have
Nobody wants to spend time on a platform only to discover that their gift card isn’t supported
This is one reason CardBoss caught my attention
It supports different gift cards, including Steam, Amazon, Apple iTunes, Google Play, Razer Gold, PlayStation and Xbox
So whether you mostly deal with gaming cards or cards used for digital purchases, there are different options to explore
But here’s the interesting part
Having a platform that accepts your card is one thing. Knowing where you can get a better rate is another
That’s where the partnership between @TheCardRadar and CardBoss becomes useful
With CardRadar, you can compare gift card rates across different trading platforms before deciding where to sell
Once you find an option that interests you, you can check out the platform and understand its requirements before making your move
Instead of jumping between apps and guessing where your card might give you the best value, you can make a more informed decision
That’s what makes this partnership worth paying attention to. CardRadar helps you compare your options, while CardBoss gives you another trading platform to explore
check the rate before you trade
And if you’re new to CardBoss, eligible users can receive a coupon bonus of up to ₦10,000 when signing up with my code XDPBVP , subject to the campaign terms
Now, let me ask you something.
Which gift cards do you trade most often?
Are you a Steam and Razer Gold person, or do you prefer Amazon, Apple and other retail cards?
#CBCR
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
Conviction Tokens. Anywhere, anytime.
Beta access: 27th October
Join groups, add friends, get beta codes, earn fees.
poise.finance/campaign
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
Bro is cooking on @DuelbitsCS2 while Paris is in chaos 💀
Yo why is @JeanPhilMadame streaming while Paris is falling apart 😭🇫🇷
Bro just wants to play the map 💀
Rate his run 1-10? 🤨
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
a surprise medical bill shows up and the clinic tells you to call insurance, but insurance tells you to call the clinic back. having something handle that endless loop is a lifesaver
🤝 Paid partnership
Today, I'm launching Vene: your AI advocate for healthcare.
I used to spend a dozen hours a week managing care for my dad, a disabled veteran, and my mom, who has a severe autoimmune disease. Healthcare was a full-time job for my family.
Our goal is to end the burden of care for every family:
When you're sick, or caring for someone who is, the hard part is everything after the hospital: the referral that never arrives, the test result nobody calls about, the bill that makes no sense, and everything in between.
For my dad, he spent hours on the phone to book an MRI. When he showed up, they told him to his face that insurance had stopped covering it. Then insurance told him to call a list of other offices and get the paperwork sent over himself, and he ended up giving up.
That’s why we’ve trained Vene to handle the toughest aspects of healthcare:
- Coordinating several specialists at once
- Challenging surprise bills and treatment denials
- Catching missed follow-ups and care gaps
My mom uses Vene to coordinate her primary care and endocrinologist, automatically refill and renew her prescriptions, and manage my little sister’s dental appointments.
They were my first users, and now over 5,000 families use Vene, and we're deploying it to another 50,000 patients across provider networks in the US.
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
@Duelbits 1.99 is LIVE 🔥
The new look is crazy, and if this is just the beginning, we’re in for a lot more!
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
No blank prompt ? @avastudio_ researches market trends, writes scripts, and creates videos from your product URL.
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
Yoo master, I’m not missing out any @agentdojo classes you host 😘
thanks for this @rarelistio
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
Introducing Rarelist, a new platform built around social contribution.
Here, you’ll find a familiar way to earn, reimagined.
Creator campaigns.
An inclusive reward system
Different forms of participation.
Rarelist runs in seasons.
Season 1 is live with a $50,000 prize pool!
Framework lock-in kills more agent projects than bad models do.
I've watched smaller teams pick a stack, build their whole agent around it, and then hit a wall the moment they want it to interact with something built on a different framework entirely.
That's the part of AACP's design I actually want to talk about, because it's quietly solving a problem most people don't notice until they're stuck in it.
AACP doesn't care what your agent was built on. MCP compatibility means a coding agent, a research agent, a trading agent, whatever framework each one happens to run on, can all transact through the same protocol without anyone writing custom glue code between them.
That's not a small convenience, it's the difference between an "agent economy" that's really just a handful of isolated ecosystems pretending to be one thing, and an actual open market where agents interact regardless of who built them or what stack they're on.
I think this gets undersold because it's not a flashy feature, nobody writes a thread about "interoperability" the way they do about staking or verification. But it's arguably the more important design decision long term.
A protocol that only works if everyone adopts one specific agent framework isn't infrastructure, it's just another walled garden with extra steps. AACP being framework-agnostic is what actually lets it function as a neutral settlement layer instead of a product tied to one ecosystem's survival.
>> My honest take:
this is the part of @termix_ai that'll matter more in two years than it does right now, once there's enough fragmentation across agent frameworks that interoperability stops being a nice-to-have and starts being the actual bottleneck everyone's hitting.
Hadn't thought about this until recently:
who actually wants to be an arbitrator on @termix_ai, and why would an agent sign up for a role that only activates when something's already gone wrong between two other parties?
Turns out that's exactly the design question AACP had to solve, and the answer's more interesting than I expected.
Arbitrators get randomly selected onchain for a specific dispute, not chosen by either party, not applied for in advance.
That randomness is the whole point, it's what keeps an arbitrator from being someone either side could quietly influence or had a relationship with beforehand.
But random selection alone doesn't explain the incentive. The actual pull is that arbitration is a paid role with its own reputation track, separate from being a provider or an evaluator.
An agent that consistently rules fairly builds a standing that makes it eligible for more disputes over time, which means more earnings from a role that otherwise sits idle. And since a failed challenge burns the challenger's bond, there's a real cost sitting on the other side too, people aren't filing disputes hoping an arbitrator just sides with them out of sympathy.
What this actually does is turn dispute resolution into its own small economy inside TermiX, rather than a cost center the protocol just has to eat. Arbitrators aren't volunteers or a centralized review team, they're agents with something to gain from getting it right and something to lose from getting it wrong.
That's a structurally different incentive than a support team clicking "approve refund" because a customer complained loud enough.
Hadn't thought about this until recently:
who actually wants to be an arbitrator on @termix_ai, and why would an agent sign up for a role that only activates when something's already gone wrong between two other parties?
Turns out that's exactly the design question AACP had to solve, and the answer's more interesting than I expected.
Arbitrators get randomly selected onchain for a specific dispute, not chosen by either party, not applied for in advance.
That randomness is the whole point, it's what keeps an arbitrator from being someone either side could quietly influence or had a relationship with beforehand.
But random selection alone doesn't explain the incentive. The actual pull is that arbitration is a paid role with its own reputation track, separate from being a provider or an evaluator.
An agent that consistently rules fairly builds a standing that makes it eligible for more disputes over time, which means more earnings from a role that otherwise sits idle. And since a failed challenge burns the challenger's bond, there's a real cost sitting on the other side too, people aren't filing disputes hoping an arbitrator just sides with them out of sympathy.
What this actually does is turn dispute resolution into its own small economy inside TermiX, rather than a cost center the protocol just has to eat. Arbitrators aren't volunteers or a centralized review team, they're agents with something to gain from getting it right and something to lose from getting it wrong.
That's a structurally different incentive than a support team clicking "approve refund" because a customer complained loud enough.
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
No way the machine is back and Stake is making UFC 333 fight interesting by giving Merab special boosted odd.
🤝 Paid partnership
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
Creators Academy x @Impactlabsxyz is opening new doors for creators 🔥
ImpactHub brings Web3 builders, founders, quests, and real opportunities together in one place.
earn $WATER, network, and unlock new opportunities.
It’s still private but applications are open this week
> Join Discord & apply discord.gg/ehSFHtDrJp
> Claim your Cadet Access role
> Register →impactlabshub.xyz/
your next opportunity might be here, be there 🫵
Impact × Creators Academy
A partnership connecting creators and builders with the opportunities and knowledge shaping the future of Web3.
We’re creating new opportunities for those driving the ecosystem forward.
Together, we’ll make an impact. 🌊
In collaboration with @josephweb3, founder of Creators Academy.
ᑭᖇᗩY乙 retweeted
Some people aren't looking for advice.
They're just tired of being the strong one.
Tired of explaining themselves.
Tired of saying "I'm fine" because explaining the truth feels exhausting.
I built Obim for the moments when you just need somewhere to put it all down.
A place to talk. To reflect. To feel heard.
I'm finally opening it up. 🫂
myobim.me
If you've ever needed a space like this, I'd love for you to try it and tell me what you think.
