Charles Roman

AI is getting WILD! 🤯✨ Imagine creating Disney-style animated videos with just a few prompts. What once required huge studios, teams, and budgets can now be explored with AI. The future of animation is here! 🎬🚀 Are we ready for this new era? 👀

Start with the actual numbers. Not the narrative. SpaceX reported approximately $14.6 billion in revenue in Q3 2026 alone. Here's where that money came from: - $7.56 billion — AI / Super Intelligence - $5.2 billion — Connectivity, including Starlink - $1.8 billion — Space operations Now look at the government revenue share. 📉 Q3 2025: 23.9% 📉 Q3 2026: 16.6% And on November 6, Elon Musk stated that government revenue would account for less than 10% of SpaceX's revenue this quarter, falling below 5% within a year. Think about what this means. For years, one of the most repeated arguments against SpaceX has been that it's simply a company surviving on NASA and American taxpayer money. But the financial picture is becoming considerably more complicated. SpaceX is growing its commercial connectivity business, expanding its AI infrastructure and diversifying its customer base. And here's an important distinction: NASA is not the entire US government. Government revenue includes multiple federal agencies and contracts. So comparing all government revenue with NASA's budget alone is misleading. Also, a declining government revenue percentage doesn't necessarily mean government payments are falling in absolute dollars. It can also mean other business segments are growing much faster. The bigger picture? SpaceX is no longer just a rocket-launch company. It's becoming a major player in satellite connectivity, artificial intelligence and space infrastructure. You can criticize Elon Musk. You can question his business decisions. You can debate government contracts. But you cannot ignore the financial numbers simply because they don't fit your preferred narrative. Facts first. Narratives second. #SpaceX #Starlink #NASA #ElonMusk #SpaceIndustry #Technology #Business

“SpaceX is nothing more than a government contractor surviving on NASA’s money.” You've probably heard this argument countless times - on X, Reddit, in news reports, and across political discussions. The accusation is familiar: SpaceX owes its existence to taxpayers. Elon Musk built his space empire on government funding. Without NASA, the company would have never made it this far. But the numbers Musk shared on November 6, 2026, tell a rather different story. According to Musk, government contracts will account for less than 10% of SpaceX's total revenue this quarter — and that figure is expected to fall below 5% within the next year. NASA alone reportedly contributes around 5%. Then came the statement that puts the entire debate into perspective: “SpaceX revenue this quarter alone will be substantially higher than NASA’s entire annual budget.” Think about that for a moment. A single quarter of revenue from a private space company could exceed the entire annual budget of the government agency often portrayed as its financial lifeline. The same company frequently described as being dependent on NASA is now claiming to generate more revenue in roughly 90 days than NASA receives in an entire year. So, what exactly is the relationship here? Is SpaceX the greatest return on public investment in modern space history? Or have critics misunderstood the distinction between government funding, commercial contracts, and private-sector innovation? One thing is certain: the conversation deserves more than recycled talking points. Let's look beyond the headlines, examine the numbers, understand the NASA–SpaceX relationship, and explore why the narrative of a company entirely dependent on government money continues to persist. 🧵