PQC Quantum-Safe Strategy fr 2017 CryptoMaxi, Proof-of-Work maxi Pushing bitcoin to be quantum-safe, or 0 #Raqcoin #Algorand #QRLedger https://xitter.cf/t.co/UhtNC6xpDf

Joined March 2022
Huge congratulations to Mr.President Donald Trump @realDonaldTrump Please don’t add bitcoin to the US federal reserve! Because it could probably be 0 in quantum computer times! just keep waiting for another 2 years, we all gonna find it! Ok?! Congratulations!
144
62
17
138
37,285
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
这是一个关于 #Raqcoin 的 AI。 如果你对抗量子计算的 PoW 区块链感兴趣,可以花几分钟时间了解一下。 我相信你会从中有所收获。特别是它的抗量子签名算法极其强大——目前是唯一一种能够长期安全顺畅运行 PoW 机制的。 raqcoin.club #PowPQC #NIST #UOV #Multivariate #Raqcoin #Qday
2
3
41
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
This is an AI about #Raqcoin. If you are interested in quantum-resistant PoW blockchains, you can take a few minutes to learn about! raqcoin.club #PowPQC #NIST #UOV #Multivariate #Raqcoin #Qday #Quantum
3
3
55
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
Replying to @LisaDavisva7
Go mine quantum-resistant crypto Post-Quantum Cryptography(PQC) #PowPQC
2
1
27
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
If your data needs to stay secret for a decade, it’s arguably exposed already. That’s “harvest now, decrypt later,” and NIST names it as a main reason the move to post-quantum cryptography is urgent. Its newly finalized roadmap (NISTIR 8547) points to where to start: > Account for your entire cryptographic supply chain, not just your own systems > Consider FIPS 203 first for sensitive, long-lived data > Hybrid (classical + PQC) is an accepted path We’ve been building for this since 2022. Our CBO Richard Lee on what that taught us:
NIST’s new PQC migration guidelines can help organizations transition to post-quantum cryptography standards. This report outlines the timelines and activities for federal agencies and serves as a resource for organizations navigating the transition. 🔗 nist.gov/news-events/news/20…
2
12
566
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
Mining RAQ in 3 steps: 1) Wallet: back up seed phrase offline 2) Sync a full node (~6.8 GB) or join mqscan.io 3) Run GPU miner with your payout address Win10/11 · 8 GB RAM · 15 GB disk · GTX 1070+ Block finding is probabilistic. No earnings promise. #Raqcoin #PoW
10
9
87
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
6/n The assertion that "quantum computers are still a long way from breaking Bitcoin" is also logically flawed. This perception of "distance" is purely subjective, a one-sided, human-centric feeling lacking any objective scale. When we apply a multi-dimensional......
🤖 Made with AI
1
2
1
52
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
These books claim a secretive global banking elite (via Fed, BIS, etc.) created fiat systems in secrecy, traps nations in debt, funds both sides of conflicts, and runs covert ops for control. The poster's logic: that power is so total that Bitcoin is either co-opted, a distraction, or powerless against it—making public "Big Bitcoin" enthusiasm look naive.
1
70
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
All 3 of these claims are absurd: "Quantum is FUD," "Don't reuse the same Bitcoin address," and "The quantum threat is still a long way off." 這三種說法都是荒謬的: “量子是FUD”, “不重複使用同一個比特幣地址”, “量子威脅還遠” xitter.cf/r8raq/status/211531141…
1/n To claim quantum threat is "FUD" is a patently absurd logical fallacy. If it were truly just FUD, why is there a global push to upgrade/migrate virtually all internet & com infras to quantum-safe: with mandates in place to complete transition by 2035, or even as early as 31?
2
1
1
81
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
Buy #Raqcoin Quantum resistant bitcoin-equivalence PoW cryptocoin!
12
1
19
831
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
3/n Quantum risk creates enormous uncertainty for nearly all PoW cryptos both Bitcoin & Zcash face issues: How should it select appropriat quantum-safe dig-sig algo? Wat should happen to dormant? Can they get consensus on wat & when to migrate/complete its transition in time?
🤖 Made with AI
1
4
6
96
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
9/n Even if a large portion were migrated, it would likely be far too late. Viewed in this light, it becomes evident that such claims are misleading, logically unsound, and fail to account for any objective temporal scale.
🤖 Made with AI
1
35
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
8/n it is virtually impossible for all existing Bitcoin to be migrated to quantum-safe in any meaningful future timeframe!!!!
🤖 Made with AI
1
1
39
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
3/n ..The actual, or even just the potential, future compromise of any Bitcoin public key would immediately undermine the validity & legitimacy of Bitcoin as a whole, leading to an immediate erosion of its value.
🤖 Made with AI
1
2
1
37
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
2/n The claim that "your Bitcoin is safe as long as you don't reuse addresses" is similarly misleading. It ignores the holistic nature of the Bitcoin system. All Bitcoin holders exist within a single, unified ecosystem......
🤖 Made with AI
1
2
2
51
JIN LIU: be quantum-safe or 0 正推动比特币要么抗量子破解,要么归零! retweeted
1/n To claim quantum threat is "FUD" is a patently absurd logical fallacy. If it were truly just FUD, why is there a global push to upgrade/migrate virtually all internet & com infras to quantum-safe: with mandates in place to complete transition by 2035, or even as early as 31?
🤖 Made with AI
1
4
1
4
180
1/n To claim quantum threat is "FUD" is a patently absurd logical fallacy. If it were truly just FUD, why is there a global push to upgrade/migrate virtually all internet & com infras to quantum-safe: with mandates in place to complete transition by 2035, or even as early as 31?
🤖 Made with AI
1
4
1
4
180
8/n it is virtually impossible for all existing Bitcoin to be migrated to quantum-safe in any meaningful future timeframe!!!!
🤖 Made with AI
1
1
39
9/n Even if a large portion were migrated, it would likely be far too late. Viewed in this light, it becomes evident that such claims are misleading, logically unsound, and fail to account for any objective temporal scale.
🤖 Made with AI
1
35