Ray Corrigan retweeted
Genocide is still on.
Principled action - from states, companies, institutions and people - is needed to stop it.
Worldwide strike- Oct 30.
100+ PORTS. WORLDWIDE. NO MORE WEAPONS.
On October 30th, dockworkers, seafarers, students and communities in more than 100 ports around the world are standing together to say one thing: NO MORE WEAPONS.
War doesn’t run itself. It runs on our hands loading the cargo, and on our silence when blockades are enforced. Governments and corporations that profit from it have counted on both for too long. From now on, they get neither.
NO TO THE WAR MACHINERY.
We take the ports. We take the streets. We shut it down. Oct 30th
Action map link: gsumud.link/OCT30
Ray Corrigan retweeted
Two+yrs ago I said: " I long for the day there will be an investigation on the role of Western media in the genocide in Gaza".
From the very beginning many authoritative media have acted unprofessionally and irresponsible.
My last report proves there is more. And it's ugly.
Reproducir las afirmaciones del poder en lugar de someterlas a escrutinio no es periodismo y puede contribuir a crímenes atroces
El nuevo informe de la relatora de la ONU sobre los medios de comunicación en tiempos de genocidio ↘️
eldiario.es/opinion/zona-cri…
Ray Corrigan retweeted
The ICJ found Israel's occupation unlawful. It must end.
Until then, under int'l law, Palestinians have the right to resist it through lawful means.
Israel shall protect its youth by ending the colonial project that traps many of them in committing atrocity crimes.
A war is coming to the West Bank
Yesterday Palestinian resistance fighters conducted a surgical strike against Israeli occupation soldiers, fully in accordance with international law.
In response, Israeli government immediately announced that they will do war crimes and started doing war crimes.
All the Palestinian villages in the West Bank are under siege, the city of Hebron is under siege. IDF is demolishing house after house, raiding family after family. They said they want to turn Hebron into Rafah.
More than 250 families were kicked out into the streets with nothing. People slept on the street last night.
The Israeli election is in 3 days, and the Netanyahu-Smotrich government is going to use this to start a war in the West Bank.
The only way to stop this is pressure from all directions. We know it works. International pressure worked for the besieged house in Qusra, which still belongs to the Palestinians because of the all-around attention. It can work for Hebron too.
But it will require EVERYONE reading this doing everything they can to stop this. Call your representative, hold a demonstration, organise direct action against the occupation’s assets abroad. Keep attention on the West Bank.
ACT NOW.
Ray Corrigan retweeted
In years of genocide
hope came from the young
In Serbia
2 yrs of youth-led protest -integrity, unity, perseverance- brought change
Today that hope is a rainbow
its far end in Brazil
May it shine
wherever wounds run deep
and the young are fighting the old
Humanity will prevail
Ray Corrigan retweeted
I can't stop thinking of how Apartheid Israel has killed Palestinian media workers (~300) and their relatives (700+), making Gaza the deadliest place for journalists EVER.
Time to make sure the genocidaires and their cheerleaders are held to account.
📰 My new report “Truth under the Rubble: Media in the Time of Genocide” is out
🔗 Available in all official UN Languages: ohchr.org/en/documents/count…
🇺🇳 FOLLOW THE PRESENTATION
@ the UN General Assembly, New York
>Monday 26 October
2pm EST/ 7pm CET
Livestream details will follow.
Ray Corrigan retweeted
Another strong follow up report by @NiemanLab @HanaaTameez @decka227. They’ve owned this beat and the tick tock of Meta’s efforts to claim authorization to scrape much of the web’s intellectual property to train its AI. niemanlab.org/2026/10/u-k-po…
Ray Corrigan retweeted
deja vu. techcrunch.com/2016/12/08/an…
Ray Corrigan retweeted
It feels like the lawsuit discovery that surfaced his text messages with other board members when he previously did this are relevant. And the Delaware suit they settled last year that presented evidence the board isn’t independent and they overpaid in $5B to FTC to protect him.
NEW —
The extraordinary story of how Mark Zuckerberg wheeled and dealed to get Meta’s board of directors to protect him from California’s wealth tax.
With @elitanjourno
nytimes.com/2026/10/21/techn…
Ray Corrigan retweeted
As I said at the time, the multi-state settlement with Meta was a slap on the wrist. New Mexico was just awarded $25 billion for privacy violations, with $15 billion related to Cambridge Analytica.
The multi-state settlement? $459 million that must be divided up among 48 states for the same violations.
Florida isn't going to sell out to Meta. We're going to hold them accountable.
A judge orders Meta to pay $25 billion after a jury finds the company had misled consumers about data privacy. nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/m…
Ray Corrigan retweeted
Watch this video. No interviewer/journalist should ever help their guest with platforming and filling in their misleading statements. Then read the report on the $25B fine from the jury verdict after having reviewed the evidence.
🔊 It’s one of the biggest financial penalties in US history. A New Mexico judge has ordered Meta to pay $25 billion after a jury finds the company misled consumers about Facebook data privacy. Listen to the Reuters World News podcast for more reut.rs/47xRrF2
Ray Corrigan retweeted
If you're an investor, Meta shed $115B today.
But if you're a business or artist with intellectual property, watch the clock.
8 days until Meta claims right to scrape your site to develop its AI. Your consent? Apparently unnecessary. All it takes is use of Meta's services.
Ray Corrigan retweeted
👉NEW -- UK boosts Saudi support after it kills Yemeni civilians
by @jmcevoy_2
Wes Streeting once called for an arms embargo on Saudi Arabia. Now he’s helping its air force bomb Yemen.
declassifieduk.org/uk-boosts…
Ray Corrigan retweeted
The International Criminal Court and its officials have been awarded the European Parliament's 2026 Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought.
Learn more about the laureate here ➡️ link.europa.eu/rVBvTR

ALT A group of judges in blue robes sit in session at the International Criminal Court. The text reads: “2026 Laureates of the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, The International Criminal Court and its officials, Democracy in action.” The European Parliament logo is in the bottom right‑hand corner.
Ray Corrigan retweeted
President Trump is telling the press that he is done negotiating with the Iranians and that something will be happening "fairly soon", while America's other president, Benjamin Netanyahu, proclaims that the time has come to topple Tehran once and for all.
Ray Corrigan retweeted
‘If we dehumanize others, we dehumanize ourselves.’
‘I get my heart broken when I talk to people’, Ori Goldberg explaining why he does his shopping in the early morning to avoid overhearing fellow Israeli’s inane conversations. What’s about the maximum level of disarming vulnerability I’ve seen on camera? Ori Goldberg telling young people interviewing not to worry about any sounds of flatulence. ‘It’s me, not you.’ He explains how he has a stoma, because of his colon cancer. Putting people at ease while being forced to knock at whatever afterlife’s door there may be. He wasn’t particularly religious I heard him say in an interview, so I can’t say what Ori thought was awaiting him after his passing at the much too young age of 50, having to leave three children behind.
In every interview he was remarkably welcoming, encouraging interviewers to ask any question burning on their tongues, even very private, uncomfortable ones. He always answered with the same calm tone and serene decorum.
He spoke very openly about his feelings living in a society he labeled as ‘genocidal’, ‘supremacist’ and ‘hollowed out.’
He said: ‘Am crushed’
He spoke of his isolation. How he avoided people, because even friends often spoke with detachment and apathy about the deaths of Palestinians.
‘Am very happy to talk with you’, to a podcaster and you could feel the relief in him.
In at least one interview he is receiving chemo at home and yet there he is. He was generous with his time with podcasters, also small ones, even right after going on Al Jazeera.
He didn’t seem to be interested in attention, but only in sharing his empathy, vulnerability, views and to pay off a debt he felt he had.
He said he felt his sins ‘could never be expunged.’
He called a spade a spade and never minimized or sugar coated anything Israel does.
‘Israel is in it to destroy.’
‘Israel now only cares about death.’
He described how sowing death and destruction was Israel’s idea of victory.
He was convinced there was no bigger strategy, that Israelis were simply jumping at opportunities to kill, without any clear plan for the future.
Netanyahu was not the source of the madness, but only its symbol, its most competent galvanizers of the dark forces long smouldering in the Israeli breast. He explained how even many who vote for him can’t stand Bibi, but need his drive for supremacy.
He was humble and merciless in his self-judgement.
When he said ‘If I was attacked on the street for being Israeli I wouldn’t tell them, hey, am one of the good guys’ you wanted to reach out and hug him.
He explained how he felt he had to stay in Israel, because he had played role in building it through his work at university and for the military.
He was convinced Israel had crossed a Rubicon. That a dark, evil spirit had taken hold of the country and that killing Palestinians was just something that Israelis felt was a task that had to be done. After all, the Palestinians had brought everything on themselves. A society with millions of little children.
He wasn’t sure as to solutions. At times he considered a one state solution and at times a two solutions.
The right of return he supported wholeheartedly.
One of the most profound points he kept hammering was this:
‘If we dehumanize others, we dehumanize ourselves.’
It takes a real fully developed Mensch to say that and mean it and understand the full implications of that wisdom.
He was certain that violence is cyclical in nature and that what Israel was doing to people in Palestine, Iran and Lebanon was certain to come and haunt Israelis.
‘We are the ones being drowned. We are our own victims when we are doing what we are doing.’
He emphasized how his fellow Israelis didn’t realize how reviled they really are and blame all that hatred on typical tropes.
His scariest insights were on how exceptional Israelis feel. How their suffering is the greatest ever and how they were consciously or unconsciously riding that supposed credit.
He had little praise of Israeli opposition voices, because in the end they don’t challenge the occupation or the gradual swallowing up of the West Bank.
whatever sins you claimed to have, the people who embraced you continue your work and the ripple effects are vast, whatever sins you had, they have been expunged.
The idea that Israel had been victorious post-October 7th he emphatically denied. There was no strategic victory, only death, massive damage to Israel’s standing in the world and no real defeat of Israel’s enemies.
Hamas? Still there. Hezbollah? Still there. Iran’s governing system? Alive and kicking and impressively flexible, not tolerant and far from perfect, but flexible and completely misunderstood by the US and Israel and just about everyone else.
Israel’s violence to Ori was merely despair.
A Flucht nach vorne as they say in German.
He did not spare the west or western institutions and indicted those of enabling Israel’s blind mad dog course.
It takes courage to live in society that acts like Israeli society and then to critize that society so openly, so relentlessy and at great cost to one’s self. Ori could have chosen to squeeze maximum personal joy, pleasure and fun experiences out of his days, but instead he devoted most of his time to fighting evil.
Given how many people feel the world has lost some of its brightest, most soothing light after his death, it’s fair to say he touched the hearts of many.
Whatever he did before his Saul on the road to Damascus style fall (meaning a complete change of views, sorry, I was kinda thrown into the classic biblical bath as a kid) am no Catholic priest and it’s not really my right, but I will be forgiven for forgiving this beautiful man. Ego te absolvo, Ori. Your sins, whatever they were, are hereby expunged by the sadness your death have caused, proof of how much good and nourishment you brought to souls hungry for redemption, a fair reckoning and a kinder, disarmed world in the way you were kind and disarming.
Ray Corrigan retweeted
Hi @andyburnham even Irvine Welsh is calling out Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper's policy which has now seen over 3,600 arrested for non violent protest
Like Baron Hain I've never supported the group, and like @IrvineWelsh I had only really heard of them when your predecessors decided to proscribe them.
"They've broadened the definition of terrorism to the extent that it's absolute nonsense.. It's made young people feel: this country, what is it actually about"
"1% of their activities involved breaking into places where people manufacture weapons of mass destruction"
"You've got trespass and criminal damage, you don't need to proscribe them as terrorists, it's crazy"
"They're not terrorists. Terrorists are people that bomb people and blow people up, they're not people who break into missle manufacturers to stop people bombing people and blowing people up"
Andy Burnham, this is a moment for leadership. You have the power to challenge a policy that has led to thousands of arrests for peaceful protest.
If you stay silent and let it continue, you won’t just inherit this record, it will become part of your legacy, as it's Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper's legacy.
Will you act, or leave others to defend the civil liberties Labour once stood for?
Ray Corrigan retweeted
The new independent review on antisemitism has been sliced, diced and briefed to the media before Joe Public can read it. So we have no idea how rigorous its metholodologies or assumptions are; and it sticks in the craw that the messaging from it is being repeated and controlled in the media before it can be properly scrutinised by the ordinary public.
It is a painful thing to have to even consider whether this review can be taken in good faith or whether it should be contested, but we have seen how the genuinely important fight against antisemitism has been debased by the Labour Together project, which frequently conflated robust criticism of Israel with antisemitism and has consistently worked to constrain the range of acceptable speech on Israel - including cracking down and criminalising protest against Israel's conduct abroad through, for example, proscribing Palestine Action.
This independent review was initiated by a Labour Together alum, Bridget Philipson, under the government of Starmer, who will now receive the report and (most likely) accept its findings.
So what do know about it?
Not much, beyond what has been briefed, but its Terms of Reference indicate three things:
1. The review uses the IHRA Definition of Antisemitism to identify antisemitic incidents. The IHRA Definition, when read in totality, has the effect of making any form of anti-Zionism antisemitic.
Practically, it has often been used to stigmatise fair but robust criticism of Israel as antisemitic. For example, it states the claim 'Israel is a racist endeavour' is antisemitic because it denies the Jewish right to self-determination, even though Israel's founding included the systematic and racist persecution of Palestinians in the Nakba.
The review's methodology will almost certainly capture anti-Zionism as antisemitic. But approximately 12% of all Jewish people identify as anti-Zionist. Considerably more young Jewish people identify as anti-Zionist: approximately 25% of British Jews aged 20-29 are anti-Zionist, while 20% are non-Zionist. Less than 50% of British Jews between 20 and 29 are Zionist.
The adoption of the IHRA Definition, and its elastic application to describing robust criticism of Israel, is hugely problematic from a methodological point of view, and is likely to significantly expand the number of recorded incidents, and will likely capture statements made by anti-Zionist Jews, as well as robust-but-fair criticism of Israel as it commits genocide. It's application outside of extremely limited contexts has already been disavowed by the person who drafted it, Kenneth Stern, who wrote in 2019 that it had been 'weaponised' by right-wing actors in the US.
2. The practical applications of what constitutes antisemitism appear to be highly judgemental and arguable. They give one example in the terms of reference (included below), which says it is always antisemitic to compare Jews to Nazis.
On this version, NAZA, co-produced by the Guardian and on-track to win mountains of documentary awards, contains antisemitic material because it includes IDF Officers comparing Israel's genocide in Gaza to the conduct of the Nazis in Germany towards Jews. Now, I personally think comparing Israel to Nazi Germany is often unhelpful and inflammatory; but its not inherently antisemitic (depending on the context and the mode of expression) in light of Israel's genocide in Gaza and settler terrorism in the West Bank.
It's also a view shared by very large number of British people - a survey in 2025 found that 45% of all British people believed Israel treats Palestinians like the Nazis treated Jews. This was up from 33% in 2024. A full 60% of people aged 18-24 in Britain think the comparison is accurate. This review starts with the premise, in effect, that 45% of British people (and 60% of young university and college-aged Brits) are antisemitic and their views must policed in school and college environments.
3. I simply don't think you can have a credible 'independent' review that includes anyone from the Board of Deputies of British Jews. The Board - an explicitly Zionist organisation - has a horrible record of conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism, and a particularly horrible record in defending Israel in light of its conduct in Gaza. One of the reviewers is Karen Newman, the Deputy Vice-President of the Board of Deputies.
My hunch is that this is going to be another inflammatory, unhelpful intervention of the likes pioneered by the CST and ADL, which expands the definition of antisemitism so broadly as to stigmatise significant expressions of pro-Palestinian activism as a form of antisemitism.
I genuinely worry that the government, in accepting this report, will likely inflame tensions in schools, forcing a top-down one-size-fits-all approach to a nuanced topic on school leaders. It is these leaders who have already been dealing with these vexed topics, and I have little doubt that they will continue to be best placed to navigate these complex issues in their communities on their own.
We already saw how this reckless top-down approach played out in genuinely despicable ways when Steve Reed accused Bristol Brunel academy of blocking the visit of Damien Egan because he was Jewish - an allegation that was subsequently pilloried in OFSTED reviews, but only after creating huge local upset and uproar, and significantly disrupting the functioning of the school
I don't see how a draconian, top-down policing of discussion on Israel in schools is not going to cause huge tensions and uproar amongst students and teachers. And I have almost zero faith that the remnants of the Labour Together project in government will tackle this issues sensitively or appropriately, or without the heaviest possible hand.
Ray Corrigan retweeted
Un discorso di una violenza inaudita.
Inaccettabile.
Scendano in piazza nonni e nonne, preti e suore, insegnanti ed educatori. Mamme e papà. Pediatre e psicologi.
Non si tocchino i bambini.
I bambini non si toccano.
Dalla parte della Costituzione italiana, oggi e sempre.
This quoted post is unavailable.



























