panem et circenses
Joined October 2020
- Tweets13.4K
- Following53
- Followers304
- Likes12.7K
replyguy retweeted
Republicans have a choice for 2028: At least listen to voters under 45, or continue to smear them for having the same foreign policy view Trump ran on in 2024 and calling them idiots whose problems come from them being dumb and spending too much money on avocado toast
replyguy retweeted
Californians watching everyone crash out over seeing some commie turbo freak take power in their state:
replyguy retweeted
Never forget.
Never forgive.
This is Islam.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This image is a staged scene from the 1919 silent film "Ravished Armenia" (also called "Auction of Souls"), filmed near Newhall, California. It is not a wartime photograph, though the film was based on genocide survivor Aurora Mardiganian's account. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravished_…
replyguy retweeted
I do not hate Muslims. I view their ideology as evil.
I do not want them dead, I want them to become Christian, and not by force. That’s because I love them, not because I hate them.
replyguy retweeted
🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens is celebrating being PERSONALLY DISMISSED from the Macron defamation lawsuit. But there are a few things she conveniently left out...
First, yes, Owens secured a legal victory. The Delaware court dismissed her in her individual capacity because it lacked personal jurisdiction over her - NOT because she was cleared of wrongdoing or because the judge found her allegations to be true.
However, BOTH of her companies remain defendants in the lawsuit:
- Candace Owens LLC - the company she solely owns and manages, which publishes and distributes her content.
- Georgetom, Inc. - the company operating CandaceOwens.com, including her merchandise and paid subscriptions.
The judge REJECTED their attempt to have the lawsuit dismissed on inconvenient-forum grounds.
Secondly, it's bizarre that even when Owens scores a genuine legal victory, she still feels the need to LIE.
She claims:
"I was NEVER being sued for stating that Brigitte Macron was born a male."
Yet on PAGE 8 of the judge's 56-page decision, it explicitly states:
"Throughout the Series, Ms. Owens contended that Mrs. Macron is a biological man, that the Macrons are blood relatives, and that they abused levers of state power to keep the nature of their relationship a secret."
The judge also identifies her allegations about Brigitte Macron's identity as a central part of the dispute.
Owens however, wants her audience to believe this lawsuit was only about her claims involving MKUltra and an alleged identity theft. But the court's own description of the case proves this false.
The Macrons also secured TWO significant procedural victories:
-The court REFUSED to dismiss the lawsuit against Owens' two companies on inconvenient-forum grounds.
-The court REJECTED the attempt to strike the Macrons' amended complaint.
A potentially decisive statute-of-limitations question remains unresolved.
So yes, Candace Owens won an important personal legal victory. But she was NOT vindicated on the merits, BOTH of her companies remain defendants, and the lawsuit is FAR from over.
replyguy retweeted
Absolute truth. Charlie being killed gives Candy the Demon a sexual high. That's why she kills him again and again. Every single day.
She can't live without the high.
replyguy retweeted
No, Candace Owens... you are positively insane!
When Candace was sued by the Macron's (which was brought on herself after being warned by Trump himself & another WH intermediary) she criticized Trump & Vance for not putting out a public statement defending her and stated the DOJ should be focused on "worthy victims, like herself."
She now has the gall (when Charlie Kirk was an ACTUAL WORTHY VICTIM who was brutally assassinated) to state Trump's opinion regarding the slow process it's been through our judicial system shouldn't be legal?
She later comments in this post, "The constitution is not an opinion. The sitting president of the United States should know that." Perhaps Candace should look up UT Law... UT has explicit statutory rights for crime victims (and their representatives) related to a speedy disposition of cases, separate from the defendant’s constitutional right under the Sixth Amendment and UT Constitution Article I, § 12. You would think she would know this after "investigating" for over a year!
JUSTICE FOR CHARLIE!
replyguy retweeted
You want to know how the system protects itself… it doesn't fight you head on, it just waits you out until everybody stops paying attention.
Tyler Robinson is the man charged with murdering Charlie Kirk in front of a crowd of students at Utah Valley University, and his lawyers now want to push his trial to the third quarter of 2029. Four years after Charlie was killed. Erika Kirk just filed against it, asking for the trial to be held in 2027, and her motion calls the defense timeline "grossly out of line with comparable cases." She is right, and every one of you knows she is right.
Let me explain what a delay like that actually does. Witnesses move, memories fade, the cameras go home, and the outrage that filled a stadium with grieving Americans gets folded up and filed away while the lawyers bill hours and the calendar does the work for them. Justice delayed is justice denied, and the people who run our courts know that better than anyone… so why is a 2029 date even on the table? How is this even a thing?
And yet a widow has to walk into court and ask the system to do the one job it exists to do. Think about that. She buried her husband, she picked up his work, she stood on a stage and forgave, and now she has to fight the clock too. Funny how the same system moves at lightning speed when it wants to, and crawls when it would rather you forget.
I am not asking for a show trial and I am not asking for shortcuts. I want a fair trial, a real date, and a verdict while Charlie's kids are still young enough to know their father mattered to the country he loved. Is that really too much to ask?
To the court in Utah… set the trial for 2027. Swift justice for Charlie Kirk.
Pray, Stand, Speak, ACT.
🚨 JUST IN: Erika Kirk just filed AGAINST holding Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson's m*rder trial in *late-2029* — she says it should be held in 2027 instead
2029?!!?! Freaking INSANITY. Erika is right.
Robinson's lawyers want to push the trial to the third quarter of 2029, four years after Charlie was m*rdered. Erika's motion calls that "grossly out of line with comparable cases"
SWIFT JUSTICE.
h/t @MattFinnFNC
replyguy retweeted
I like it when Catholics accuse protestants of not doing idolatry right because we only idolize God.
Meanwhile, there are Catholic churches where Jesus is nowhere to be found.
Respectfully it’s not that the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church “worships” idols.
It’s that you only “venerate” God.
As we have the Fullness of Worship (Latria) in the Eucharist you are limited to Veneration (Dulia).
Here’s a primer:
(1) From the Council of Trent:
“they (the Holy Fathers and Sacred Councils) especially instruct the faithful diligently concerning the intercession and invocation of saints; the honour (paid) to relics; and the legitimate use of images: teaching them, that the saints, who reign together with Christ, offer up their own prayers to God for men; that it is good and useful suppliantly to invoke them, and to have recourse to their prayers, aid, (and) help for obtaining benefits from God, through His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, who is our alone Redeemer and Saviour; but that they think impiously, who deny that the saints, who enjoy eternal happiness in heaven, are to be invocated; or who assert either that they do not pray for men; or, that the invocation of them to pray for each of us even in particular, is idolatry; or, that it is repugnant to the word of God; and is opposed to the honour of the one mediator of God and men, Christ Jesus; or, that it is foolish to supplicate, vocally, or mentally, those who reign in heaven. Also, that the holy bodies of holy martyrs, and of others now living with Christ,-which bodies were the living members of Christ, and the temple of the Holy Ghost, and which are by Him to be raised unto eternal life, and to be glorified,–are to be venerated by the faithful; through which (bodies) many benefits are bestowed by God on me.;”
(2) Condemnation of Iconoclasm
From the Second Council of Nicaea:
Anathemas concerning holy images
(1) If anyone does not confess that Christ our God can be represented in his humanity, let him be anathema.
(2) anyone does not accept representation in art of evangelical scenes, let him be anathema.
(3) If anyone does not salute such representations as standing for the Lord and his saints, let him be anathema.
(4) If anyone rejects any written or unwritten tradition of the church, let him be anathema.
And, please, before you presume to create a false distinction based on misapprehension of the aforementioned language note that God the Father is painted prominently in the Sistine Chapel.
(3) The Catechism of Pope Pius X
“What is idolatry?
Idolatry is the giving to any creature, for example, to a statue, to an image, or to a man, the supreme worship of adoration that belongs to God alone.
Do these words forbid every kind of image?
Certainly not; but only those of false divinities, made to be adored, as idolaters adore them. So true is this, that God Himself commanded Moses to make images, as, for example, the two statues of the Cherubim for the Ark . . . “
The Catechism of Pope Pius X
Pages CXXVI-CXXVII
Nos. 9 & 11
(4) Scripture
Veneration Of Holy Images
⁃Exodus 25:18-22 “Make two Cherubim of gold.”
⁃Numbers 21:9 “Moses made a bronze serpent, and set it up as a sign.”
⁃1 Kings 6:23-29 (walls of temples covered with carved figures of cherubim, palm trees, and open flowers)
⁃1 Kings 7:25-45 (more bronze images inside the temple: sea, oxen, and lions)
See Also
⁃Joshua 3:14-16
⁃2 Samuel 6:13-16
⁃1 Kings 3:15
⁃1 Kings 8:5
⁃Isaiah 10:11
⁃Hosea 11:2
⁃Jonah 2:8
⁃Acts 15:20
⁃2 Corinthians 6:16
⁃1 John 5:21
And Miraculous Relics
⁃2 Kings 2:13-14 (Elisha uses Elijah’s Mantle to part Jordan River)
⁃2 Kings 13:21 “as soon as man touched the bones of Elisha, he revived.”
⁃Matthew 9:20 (Miracle of Bleeding Woman)
⁃Acts 5:14-16 (Peter’s shadow falls on sick; they are healed)
John 3:14-15 And just as Moses lifted up[e] the serpent in the desert, so must the Son of Man be lifted up, f]so that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.”
replyguy retweeted
Nick Fuentes calls out Candace Owens for making the Cornell 7 case about JEWS and EPSTEIN.
"Harvey Weinstein is innocent, but the Cornell 7 are part of the Epstein class?"
replyguy retweeted
Not only did UVU commission the "independent" firm, they paid nearly $500,000 (as of August).
UVU is currently facing a Notice of Claim / lawsuit for wrongful death resulting from negligence by Erika Kirk, their kids, and Charlie's estate.
Serious question: Does anyone seriously believe that UVU would have commissioned an independent firm and paid nearly $500,000 for a report if there was any concern that the independent firm would conclude their negligence, and all but cement Kirk Estate and Erika's lawsuit?
And just flip it around to appreciate the double standard / motivated reasoning of so many. Would the same people going nuts over the UVU report "bombshell" place the slightest bit of weight in a report prepared by an "independent firm" that was commission and paid by TPUSA to look into Charlie's security and ultimately conclude it was all UVU's fault?
One of 3 things is true here: 1) The UVU report is 100% accurate; 2) The UVU report is 100% inaccurarte; 3) Somewhere in between.
Spoiler: It's option 3.
replyguy retweeted
The insanity of the Candace Owens Paradox.
Don’t respond to accusations = Guilt
Do respond to accusations = Guilt
replyguy retweeted
Harvey Weinstein offered Candace Owens $1.75 million to help his defense and contaminate the jury pool 👀
I knew this bitch was not doing that shit for free. Who else is paying this fame whore to clean up their reputation on her podcast?
Investigative and charge Candace Owens.
replyguy retweeted
BREAKING: Nancy Pelosi and Kathy Hochul’s eyebrows on pace to reach Mars before Elon Musk
