Something to know and exploit in the world of shopping: The best deals are generally always through retailers. A multibrand retailer has more reasons to replace a product, where a brand has more reasons to preserve its price. They operate on inventory “turn” and open dollars (free cash) for “chasing” replenishment from vendors since they have so many at the same time. Brands on the other hand are trying to balance that with optics and perception around brand and valuable product franchises. Eg. this is why Buck Mason refuses to discount. But (hypothetically) Mr. Porter wouldn’t hesitate to slash products to extract cash from slow movers, if it meant funding green shoots elsewhere. Exception at brand is when they’re looking to sunset a style/program on a finite window. They’re generally going to do what it takes to get clean for whatever the replacement is.