Richard Serunjogi (@richserun) header
Richard Serunjogi (@richserun) profile picture

⚡️ hire ex-founders https://teapawt.net/t.co/iRcPnLut6z, investing pioneer fund … cheerleader of business owners, previously backed by LocalGlobe, YC and Paul Graham

SF // LDN
Joined July 2009
Photo by Richard Serunjogi (@richserun)Photo by Richard Serunjogi (@richserun)Photo by Richard Serunjogi (@richserun)Photo by Richard Serunjogi (@richserun)Photo by Richard Serunjogi (@richserun)Photo by Richard Serunjogi (@richserun)Photo by Richard Serunjogi (@richserun)Photo by Richard Serunjogi (@richserun)
Richard Serunjogi retweeted
Founders cannot outsource recruiting. “Recruiting is the most important thing because you need creativity; you need motivated people. Ideally, the early people are all geniuses. They’re self-managing, low-ego, hardworking, highly competent, builders, technical—maybe one or two sellers—but you can’t watch everything. You can’t micromanage everything. The early people are the DNA of the company. When you outsource recruiting, when you have other people hiring and interviewing and making hiring decisions without your direct involvement and veto, that’s a sad day. That’s the day that the company’s no longer being driven directly by you. There’s now a fly-by-wire element in between. There’s some mechanical linkage going through another human, often at a distance. And other people are not going to have the same level of selectivity that you will as a founder. The important size at which a company starts changing is not some arbitrary number, like 20 or 30 or 40. It’s the point at which the founder is not directly recruiting and managing everyone. The moment that there are middle layers of management, then you are somewhat disconnected from the company, and your ability to directly drive a product team that can take the company from zero to one goes away. So we really cannot outsource recruiting. People think you can. They hire recruiters, for example. Maybe you can outsource a little bit of sourcing, but I would even argue that’s difficult. The reason recruiting is so, so, so important—and a lot of it is obvious, I’ll skip the obvious reasons—but one non-obvious reason is that the best people truly only want to work with the best people. Working with anyone who’s not at their level is a cognitive load upon them. And the more people they’re surrounded by who are not as good as they are, the more keenly they’re aware that they belong somewhere else, or they should be doing their own thing. The best teams are mutually motivated. They reinforce each other. Everyone’s trying to impress each other. One good test is when you’re recruiting a new person, you should be able to say to them, “Walk into that room where the rest of the team is sitting. Take anyone you want—pick them at random—pull them aside for 30 minutes, and interview them. And if you aren’t impressed by them, don’t join.” When you do that test, you will instinctively flinch at the idea of them interviewing randomly a certain person that’s kind of in the back of your mind. That’s the person you need to let go. Because that’s the person keeping you from having this high-functioning team that all wants to impress each other.”
130
537
59
4,170
224,343
Richard Serunjogi retweeted
Always a monumental moment when your portco gets acquired by one of the best players in the world 🔥 With Parsed as part of Baseten, they are now a full-stack model-customization + inference platform Incredibly proud of you guys, what a ride! Excited to be a part of the Baseten family. Full steam ahead 🚀 @mudithj @oneill_c cc: @svennj @steph_palazzolo @parsedlabs @baseten
4
4
42
6,631
Richard Serunjogi retweeted
🚨How does an AI-native startup unseat an incumbent?🚨 👇Enter the Greenfield Strategy: AI-native startup bingo. The battle between every startup and incumbent comes down to whether the startup gets distribution before the incumbent gets innovation. One of the most powerful, and underrated, ways for startups to win distribution is to serve companies at their formation: greenfield companies. @stripe @deel @mercury @cartainc @brexHQ @tryramp have all done this at scale. Why does this work? Simply put, acquiring customers de novo is easier than getting customers to switch: - Many of the large software incumbents have hostages, not customers. Their customers would love to switch, but ripping and replacing existing software is risky and expensive. New companies don’t face those switching costs; they simply look for the best solution and evaluate based on merit. - New companies don’t need as many features to have a complete solution. - New companies have fewer stakeholders. You only have to convince the founders. Grow with your customers: If you attract all of the new companies at formation and grow with them, you will become a big company as your customers become big companies. Consider @stripe: many of Stripe’s customers did not yet exist when Stripe was founded. Some of those early customers later became large businesses in their own right. So when enterprises outside of Silicon Valley also needed to prepare themselves for a shift to ecommerce models, Stripe was an obvious choice, with plenty of relevant reference customers already in place. Incumbents, on the other hand, would much rather sell to existing businesses vs. companies that don’t exist now but might exist in huge numbers in a few years. They are bound by the rules of P&L (Profit & Loss) – and there’s no “P” for greenfield companies that don’t exist yet, just “L” (in sales, marketing, and product development costs). The startup, however, isn’t bound to a financial model – the startup doesn’t need one; it's still figuring stuff out! That leaves ample room for the startup to define the category. Graduation moments: In a similar way, software “graduation moments” (the moments when a startup begins to develop enterprise needs) also create opportunities to execute this greenfield strategy. QuickBooks may be great for single-product, single-entity companies, but once businesses add multiple subsidiaries, currencies, or more complex reporting needs, they outgrow it and require the controls, integrations, and scalability of an ERP like NetSuite. And you can now build a far better ERP with AI - just look at @RilletHQ. AI-native startup Bingo: There are many different categories of enterprise software. Enough to fill a 5x5 Bingo board and more! In each category of the Bingo board, there sits an incumbent that could be dethroned by an AI-native alternative. So, how does a new company win the game of Bingo? - Pick a square - Make a narrow wedge much better - Find a constant source of new customers - Rapidly iterate and add features to grow with your customers - Don’t be constrained by the division of existing categories If you’re building a category-defining company on the Bingo board - come and talk to us. cc: @arampell @astrange @a16z
44
48
14
182
53,962
capitalism et al
If I give you $1m, and you give me the $1m back, we’ll both be at $1m ARR
4
6
268
we call this ⚡️dynamism.io
Main problem is every founder wants to hire level 5 talent and give them .3% in the company.. My #1 advice is to always give WAY more equity when you find these people. No one has regretted it so far!
2
1
4
510
🚀
The future belongs to idea guys who can just do things
294
Richard Serunjogi retweeted
10 years ago today, I published my big post on AI. It has aged quite well if I may say so myself. Of the many 2015 predictions I cited in the post about the rate of AI progress ahead, it seems that the most bullish are the ones who had it right.
232
350
76
4,610
440,755
Richard Serunjogi retweeted
The UK is still focused on flipping properties and becoming landlords
BREAKING: Trump to announce $100 billion private sector investment led by OpenAI, Softbank, and Oracle, $ORCL, for AI infrastructure; Stargate Venture to invest up to $500 billion over four years, starting with Texas data center
65
785
70
5,518
557,485
Richard Serunjogi retweeted
AI is killing remote work Software that once took days to ship can now happen in hours or minutes, enabling people to ship 10-20 times faster than before. This all changed on the day Claude 3.5 Sonnet came out. But it’s hard to get this speed-up with remote work. Even short communication delays have become significant bottlenecks in an AI-accelerated workflow. What used to be acceptable async delays now represent a material slowdown in potential productivity. When teams work together physically, they can leverage their human peers at the same pace as they use AI for immediate experimentation and refinement - testing ideas, generating alternatives, and making decisions in rapid succession. Why spend more money for a slower answer? With AI handling much of the execution work - writing code, generating content, creating designs - the main bottlenecks are now cognitive: getting stuck on problems, running low on energy, or struggling to generate fresh ideas. In-person collaboration is particularly powerful for overcoming these barriers. The spontaneous discussions, quick whiteboarding sessions, and energy of working together help teams think better, learn faster, and get unstuck more quickly. The primary advantage of remote work in the AI era may be the ability to maintain 24/7 operations through distributed teams. While an in-person team can ship 8 hours a day, a globally distributed team can ship 24 hours a day. 3x more! However, this works best as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, a strong in-office presence. The reason is less about speed and more about velocity. The optimal approach might be a core team working together physically, supplemented by remote team members who can maintain momentum across different time zones.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ To acknowledge this fact, we’re adding a cost of living adjustment based on the purchasing power parity of each country, capped at a ⅓ discount to our NYC rate. We’re also capping remote positions at 25 hours a week, to be clear that they’re not close to full-time employment. We still pay well–you’re being comped to the most expensive city in the world, after all–but the dream of the future of work being fully remote is over. But that’s okay–it was fun while it lasted!
209
137
150
1,911
1,354,978
Relativity. Your default prices are those you first became aware of 50c sodas Things have always been ‘expensive,’ perception of prices changes over time as the distance from when you first became aware of those initial prices grows.
Why are things so expensive? Best answer gets $1,000.
1
3
394
chase your goals so hard. they start chasing you pareto’s law: 10 of your 52 weeks will create 80% of your outcomes there’s 15 left to pick from. over to you.
1
1
1
247
Richard Serunjogi retweeted
Switching to founder mode is the best thing I’ve done at Brex in many years. What it means for us in practice: 1) Having a single roadmap for the entire company, where I’m the editor of what ships in each release. 2) Eliminate people manager roles. Leaders must operate at all levels, just like founders. 3) Looking at every metric the most punitive way possible, removing all room for wishful thinking and surfacing the few things that truly matter. Results: growth rate 2x faster vs a year ago, burn down 70% YoY, and my highest level of energy since I started the company. And yes, also very inspired by a conversation with @bchesky too. Silicon Valley is healing. 🙏
29
113
31
1,842
503,705
Richard Serunjogi retweeted
It's the decade of "don't sell me software to solve my problem" to "solve my problem". - No one wants to deal with the complexity of your software - No one wants to change their workflow so it fits within the parameters of your software - No one wants to retrain their teams on your product's features - No one wants to keep up with your pricing changes and long term contracts People want their problems solved. Solve their problems.
4
2
22
2,441
Richard Serunjogi retweeted
First time founder: - let’s go to networking events - let’s tweet on current topics - let’s comment on billionaire fights Second time founder: - focus on building - talk to customers - grow revenue
22
42
3
492
22,771
one of the OGs + he helps a lot ❤️
This quoted post is unavailable.
2
454
Have watched @Benji_Fernandes build @NALAmoney from ground 0. A truly world-class founder and great human being 👏👏🚀
Today, I'm excited to announce we have raised $40m Series A 🎉 🙏 It's been an incredible journey so far, we are just getting started, give us a couple of years, we've got some big plans. Thread ⬇️
1
4
2,125
Huge congrats @abenaopp - very inspiring. We’re lucky to have such a hardworking, high impact MP at the heart of govt.
The Prime Minister has asked me to join the @cabinetofficeuk and I am proud to step up to serve. Now begins the hard work of changing our country. I’m thrilled to be working with @patmcfaddenmp @elliereeves @NickTorfaen @Georgia_Gould Exciting times ahead!
1
277
The hardest part of all of this isn't shipping code Or winning the deal Or raising capital It's getting really, really good at recruiting
11
15
7
147
27,306
Richard Serunjogi retweeted
63
3,135
133
17,642
1,315,893
Richard Serunjogi retweeted
New York is going great thanks. Playing catch up on Tech Week. Finally got to meet other founders. Cheers @richserun & Josh (don’t have @) for hosting today’s meet.
2
8
896