Rose

🚨 WHAT EXACTLY ARE YOU CELEBRATING? 😂⚖️ The Massachusetts State Police did NOT admit Karen Read was framed! A judge did NOT find a conspiracy, and $100K was NOT awarded because she proved wrongdoing! MSP filed a MOTION asking the court to dismiss her declaratory judgment claims and enter judgment for $100K on her remaining tort claims. WHY $100K? Because that's the statutory damages cap for qualifying claims under the Massachusetts Tort Claims Act! And NO, $100K is NOT necessarily the most she could recover across all her lawsuits. (If she were "framed") But here's what I find HILARIOUS! If you genuinely believe Karen Read was the victim of some massive conspiracy to frame her for MURDER, WHY are you celebrating a motion that would end her claims against MSP WITHOUT a judicial finding that she was framed? Wouldn't you WANT her to prove those allegations in court? Wouldn't a finding of wrongdoing be far more significant than a $100K judgment that doesn't establish a conspiracy? MSP is literally asking the judge to DISMISS her requests for declaratory relief and enter judgment for the statutory maximum on the remaining tort claims! Now, a declaratory judgment isn't automatically a finding that someone was framed, and accepting a limited judgment doesn't mean abandoning every other lawsuit. BUT STOP CLAIMING THIS PROVES SHE WAS FRAMED! A motion is NOT a ruling. Consent to judgment is NOT an admission of conspiracy. And $100K under a statutory damages cap is NOT proof that her allegations were true! You're celebrating a legal filing as though it were a jury verdict proving a frame job! The only thing this document proves is that some people desperately need to take their Factsitol before attempting legal analysis! 💊🐢😂