Pinned Tweet
For anyone living in Altrincham or Manchester… myself, the missus & a few friends headed to “Jadugar” in Alty for their opening night/my birthday meal. It’s a new Indian restaurant and the food is absolutely banging & brilliant value. Best Indian I’ve had in years. 👌🏼
#MUFC
Still baffles me why and how people thought Sancho would have been the answer… especially on the right wing. We’d have been far better off if United did as I said in 2021…
teapawt.net/roblee7/status/1392464…
@Ryanwan18 a lovely appearance from you my mate… not sure why I decided to particularly focus on you!! 😂😂
Takes an ex Liverpool player to finally say a few bits to the fraud that is @markgoldbridge! Love this from @Carra23! 😂👏🏼
Carra vs Goldbridge went off straight away! 😂
Watch the Overlap Daily launch episode at 4pm on YouTube or listen wherever you get your podcasts 🙌⚽️ #overlapdaily #goldbridge #carragher
Bloody hell. Sounds mental. Bet he nearly choked on Pep’s cock when that part of the movie happened.
I watched the F1 film with Brad Pitt the other day, and there’s a moment where his character asks to add something to the car that isn’t really in the rules. The FIA punishes it, but the team can still race with the earlier car. It made me think.
In F1, the best teams live at the edge of the regulations. Sometimes the FIA allows what they’ve found, and sometimes it says that goes too far. Occasionally the rules are rewritten afterwards.
Now, City. I’m not defending them. A commission found they entered into sham agreements and broke the spending limits. A sham is an arrangement that isn’t what it claims to be, so that’s a different thing from using a gap nobody had spotted.
City deny it and will appeal. But I find it useful to ask/reflect on how people inside the club see it.
From their point of view, PERHAPS they believe they were doing what elite competitors do: looking at the rules, finding the limits, challenging interpretations and moving faster than the regulatory system.
From the outside, you might look at that and say, “That’s cheating.” From inside the organisation, they might say, “We found something nobody had thought of.”
If you believe you’ve found a way to bring money in, more or less within the rules (and the commission said it was not in the rules and it was cheating), you might tell yourself you’re just being a sharp competitor.
We are all asking “did City cheat?”. But I find this question interesting too: “how did City come to believe they weren’t?”
And understanding a mindset, or trying to, isn’t excusing it.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Manchester City were found guilty of 114 out of 115 charges by an independent commission. The comparison made is not in the same ball park to the level of rule breaking Man City have committed.
premierleague.com/en/news/472777…
Great opportunity to sponsor a top lad and brilliant fighter. Live on DAZN at the Manchester Arena. Massive fight too. 👊🏼
Bobby Lee retweeted
A few sponsorship opportunities have become available for my upcoming fight. November 7th at the AO arena in Manchester and live on DAZN. Great opportunity to get exposure for any business. Feel free to drop me a message for anymore information!
🤖 Made with AI
















