Pinned Tweet
"Este es su hotel (Venezuela,N.R), disfrútelo y trate de echar la menos vaina posible, podría ser la forma más sincera de redactar el primer párrafo de la constitución". José I. Cabrujas (1987). Como dicen famosos e influencers de tuiter, "No importa cuándo lo leas". Es Venezuela
Los demócratas reflexionan sobre la jornada del martes, “I learned very early on that a setback was nothing more than a setup for a comeback". Un mensaje así aquí no tendrá ni tendría eco. Exitosísimos todos ¡por supuesto!
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Stacey Abrams abrió el camino en los momentos duros. Muchos no se acordarán. Yo sí #GoDemocrats
"It wasn't simply a blue wave. It was an American tsunami."
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries declares Democrats have reclaimed control of the House, predicting the party will win at least 255 seats once every vote is counted.
Jeffries calls it a "historic majority" and says the polls underestimated the scale of the Democratic victory.
Download the Fox News app for live updates on midterm election coverage: foxnews.onelink.me/xLDS/z2jy…
Ricardo Sucre Heredia retweeted
Me pregunto lo mismo cada aniversario del triunfo de Chávez en 1998 y del breve disparate del Carmonato. Dos fechas claves para entender dónde y cómo se tomó el rumbo que llevó hasta hoy.
Ricardo Sucre Heredia retweeted
Me reuní con @jmalbares, ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de España 🇪🇸. Nuestros países mantienen estrechos vínculos históricos, revisamos la cooperación bilateral y conversamos sobre la transformación democrática que impulsa la pdta. E @delcyrodriguezv.
Agradecimos el apoyo de España durante la emergencia por los terremotos del #24J.
Ricardo Sucre Heredia retweeted
President Donald Trump acknowledged the Iran war impacted the Republican Party's performance in the midterm elections, suggesting voters were frustrated by surging gas prices.
“The Iran thing we had to do, and we continue to do it,” Trump told reporters.
Ricardo Sucre Heredia retweeted
Breaking News: Deb Haaland, the former congresswoman and interior secretary, will be the nation’s first female Native American governor after winning in New Mexico, according to The Associated Press. nyti.ms/4BFGoHo
Ricardo Sucre Heredia retweeted
.@POTUS on @VP's post: "I thought it was good. I knew that when I went in. We stopped them from having a nuclear weapon, and they'll never have a nuclear weapon."
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
#BREAKING: Navy admiral fired by Pete Hegseth flips Nancy Mace’s South Carolina seat #Midterms2026
thehill.com/homenews/campaig…
Ricardo Sucre Heredia retweeted
Not a single Democrat has won statewide in Texas in 32 years. Until last night.
Ricardo Sucre Heredia retweeted
The biggest lesson is that when Republicans stay close to our policies of economic freedom, lower taxes, and smaller government, we win. We need to return to that, stop the distractions, and get back to work for the American people.
Ricardo Sucre Heredia retweeted
Jeffries: "I haven't had a single member of the House Democratic caucus talk to me about impeachment. We've been relentlessly focused on affordability and accountability."
Ricardo Sucre Heredia retweeted
Asked when the Iran war will end, Trump says, "Whenever I want it to."
Ricardo Sucre Heredia retweeted
REPORTER: "Are you concerned about impeachment?"
@POTUS: "Not even a little bit. I think it would destroy the Democrat Party if they did that... For what? Having a successful country?"



























