Kites rise highest against the wind, not with it (Winston Churchill) ------------- If you value our work: https://xitter.cf/t.co/XKy39mHyNU

Llanelli
Joined February 2013
Btw. ScienceFiles lebt von Spenden. Wer dafür sorgen will, dass wir auch weiterhin der Stachel nicht nur im Fleisch der öffentlich-rechtlichen Lügner sind, der kann das hier tun: Herzlichen Dank! sciencefiles.org/unterstuetz…
23
47
1
88
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
I confirm the 2023 peace-treaty plan that was leaked to the FT. What the draft envisaged: - Russia withdraws its troops from most of the four oblasts it had just declared “annexed.” - The new line of demarcation runs roughly along the line as of February 24, 2022: Crimea and the part of Donbas that Russia controlled before the full-scale invasion. - Ukraine recognizes Russian control over Crimea. - Ukraine grants Russia an unobstructed land corridor to Crimea. - The ceasefire regime is guaranteed by NATO countries that provide protection for Ukraine. - Russia begins negotiations with the US on its own security guarantees. From my side, I’ll add a few insider details that few people know about. The plan was discussed NOT ONLY by Rodnyansky: the key figure was ABRAMOVICH. Moreover, Russia was ready to give up the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant as well. And the 300 billion in frozen assets was to go toward rebuilding all of Ukraine, that is, together with the occupied territories. As for Crimea: we were not required to recognize it as Russian, only to recognize Russia’s control over it. In other words, we acknowledge that right now it is under Russian control (which is how it is). We were also required to adopt a law banning the return of Crimea by military means. The land corridor to Crimea, a highway and a railway, was to be built at Russia’s expense. The hardest question was how to guard it. That is why the Russians were ready to give up Melitopol, but not Tokmak: they feared we would cut the corridor with artillery. Zelensky rejected this proposal at the time.
58
58
20
231
29,558
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
Die Jubelmeldungen des Tages: NRW verfügt über 10 GW installierte Windkraft! Die Realität NRW produziert häufiger keinen Strom aus Wind als auch nur 5 GW. Grün ist die Farbe der Narren windkraft-journal.de/2026/10…
4
18
1
87
1,190
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
🔴Iran updated analysis, October 25 I feel like Trump is inducing an internal coup in Iran: the regime’s technocrats against the IRGC. Lest we forget, President Pezeshkian is literally a heart surgeon! Look at Tom Barrack’s comments the other day, he said ther regime itself is just religious, not inherently "evil," and that the only problem is the IRGC. That distinction was telling. After Khamenei’s death, the top IRGC brass effectively took over everything, and the technocrats alone were too weak to challenge them. But with outside backing, those technocrats and the national military might finally have the leverage to stage a coup, take the government back, and put things right. Remember: the IRGC was empowered specifically to protect the regime and more importantly Khamenei himself, while the traditional national military (Artesh) was intentionally weakened. While the IRGC is thoroughly vetted and loyal at the top, you can still find potential defectors within Artesh, as its screening process was not as rigid. Furthermore, the IRGC survived on looted oil revenues, but that lifeline is now practically cut off by legendary @SecScottBessent . Without that cash flow, the lower ranks have zero incentive to fight to the death, especially if @realDonaldTrump or external intelligence reveals that Mojtaba is dead (or better yet, was dead all along, and the top brass lied to manipulate them). That sense of ultimate betrayal could shatter their willingness to resist. As for their only external backer, Russia, it's clear Moscow won't risk its overarching Ukraine deal just to bail out this collapsing regime. On top of that, the US has reportedly warned the Iraqi government to keep the PMF (the regime's proxies) on a tight leash and prevent them from coming to the rescue in the event of a conflict. We saw this playbook in Syria: once financial and military aid ( from Hezbollah and Russia) dried up, Assad fled, and his technocrat Prime Minister handed over the government. So, I’m waiting for a targeted "peeling back" of the IRGC leadership, mid-ranks, and even lower echelons, accompanied by the systematic destruction of IRGC bases (both inside and outside the cities). All of this will likely go down at "Hour Zero" to leave them zero time to react, which explains the massive concentration of forces currently in the region. Given how vast Iran is, total dominance at "Hour Zero" requires more than just U.S. bases in the south. With Washington's recent diplomatic outreach and deepening ties in the region, countries like Azerbaijan, nations in Central Asia (like Uzbakistan), and Iraq are likely to grant airspace access. Over the past few months, every single time the regime tried to repair its air defense or radar systems, they were promptly destroyed again (that’s precisely what those sporadic strikes were all about). Right now, the IRGC is effectively blind and defenseless. The fallout from the previous conflict and the widening rift between the IRGC and the government needed time to become crystal clear. Notice how Ghalibaf (who used to be the pivotal figure back during the MoU days) is completely sidelined from negotiations now. Ghalibaf was always an IRGC security man; today, U.S. overtures and proposals are directed squarely at Pezeshkian. I expect the next war to be short. Strike and then wait for the dust to settle to fully measure the impact, and then again if necessary. Next comes returning to the table and handing over the nuclear program. Once the regime is disarmed and defanged, the path will finally be clear for the Iranians to finish the revolution they started in January 8 and 9. As for the timing, the major carrier strike groups haven't arrived yet; they are still on their way, pointing to a move likely right after the midterms. Until that day, President Trump will keep the IRGC in a state of constant, exhausting panic, wearing them down day by day with endless threats and mixed signals. I’m not saying this is bound to happen, war is full of unpredictable variables that can change the course at any moment. But as someone who knows the regime well, I believe this trajectory is entirely plausible, and everything is aligning for it. Iran will be free, sooner than you think! #JavidShah‌‌‌‌‌
14
29
1
209
24,497
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
Risiko: Windpark Steinlachtal - würden Sie investieren? Der Irrsinn, der hier Kreisfinanzierung geworden ist, sieht vor, dass Steuerzahler, die hohen Strompreise, die ihnen ohnehin aus ideologischen Gründen abverlangt werden, um weitere Zahlungen, die sie Betreibern von Windkraftanlagen über ihre Steuern überweisen, aufstocken, um den Bau und Betrieb von Windturbinen an Orten zu ermöglichen, die für den Betrieb von Windturbinen schlicht nicht geeignet sind. Und natürlich wird diese Subventionierung miserabler Standorte die Strompreise weiter in die Höhe treiben, und so weiter und so fort. Ein Ponzi-Scheme, das irgendwann aus den Fugen gerät und platzt... sciencefiles.org/2026/10/24/…
6
28
1
68
1,083
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
Heute ist es wieder soweit: Bei Zeitumstellung lauert der Schlaganfall Junk Science und Focus unterhalten eine symbiotische Beziehung - Ohne Zeitumstellung gäb es 300.000 weniger Schlaganfälle, titelt der Focus. Nicht nur weniger Schlaganfälle, auch weniger Fette, also adipöse Zeitgenossen gäbe es, gäbe es keine Sommerzeit. Leider hat sich meine Hoffnung, meiner Arthritis im Knie mit der Abschaffung der Sommerzeit "adieu" sagen zu können, nicht erfüllt: Kein signifikanter Zusammenhang. (Link im Kommentar)
1
5
227
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
Risiko: Windpark Steinlachtal - würden Sie investieren? Der Irrsinn, der hier Kreisfinanzierung geworden ist, sieht vor, dass Steuerzahler, die hohen Strompreise, die ihnen ohnehin aus ideologischen Gründen abverlangt werden, um weitere Zahlungen, die sie Betreibern von Windkraftanlagen über ihre Steuern überweisen, aufstocken, um den Bau und Betrieb von Windturbinen an Orten zu ermöglichen, die für den Betrieb von Windturbinen schlicht nicht geeignet sind. Und natürlich wird diese Subventionierung miserabler Standorte die Strompreise weiter in die Höhe treiben, und so weiter und so fort. Ein Ponzi-Scheme, das irgendwann aus den Fugen gerät und platzt... (Link im Kommentar)
2
4
1
14
460
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
This is just sad.
295
1,060
176
10,508
271,349
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
Kambodscha, kurz nach dem die Grundbedürfnisse der Menschen vergesellschaftet wurden.
59
972
37
5,902
39,294
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
Investoisitko? - Ponzi huijaus, joka romahtaa millä hetkellä tahansa #vihreäsiirrymä #tuulivoima #talous
Risiko: Windpark Steinlachtal - würden Sie investieren? Der Irrsinn, der hier Kreisfinanzierung geworden ist, sieht vor, dass Steuerzahler, die hohen Strompreise, die ihnen ohnehin aus ideologischen Gründen abverlangt werden, um weitere Zahlungen, die sie Betreibern von Windkraftanlagen über ihre Steuern überweisen, aufstocken, um den Bau und Betrieb von Windturbinen an Orten zu ermöglichen, die für den Betrieb von Windturbinen schlicht nicht geeignet sind. Und natürlich wird diese Subventionierung miserabler Standorte die Strompreise weiter in die Höhe treiben, und so weiter und so fort. Ein Ponzi-Scheme, das irgendwann aus den Fugen gerät und platzt... sciencefiles.org/2026/10/24/…
1
1
115
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
Wer nach solchen Aussagen noch die Linken wählt, hat weder in Wirtschaftskunde noch in Geschichte aufgepasst: Noch nie (!) und nirgendwo hat dieser sozialistische Unfug funktioniert, die Folge waren ausnahmslos Armut und Unfreiheit für alle (ausser den Parteifunktionären selbst).
2036 fliegen die Amerikaner zum Mars und wir stehen in der Schlange vor dem Staats-Aldi.
37
138
3
726
7,783
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
Mao Zedong hatte auch die "Grundbedürfnisse verstaatlicht": Mit seinem "Großen Sprung nach vorn" (1958 - 1962) verursachte er eine Hungersnot, in der schätzungsweise 40 Millionen Menschen umkamen. Damals wie heute und morgen gilt: Sozialismus ist sprichwörtlich tödlich für die breite Bevölkerung.
Wer nach solchen Aussagen noch die Linken wählt, hat weder in Wirtschaftskunde noch in Geschichte aufgepasst: Noch nie (!) und nirgendwo hat dieser sozialistische Unfug funktioniert, die Folge waren ausnahmslos Armut und Unfreiheit für alle (ausser den Parteifunktionären selbst).
5
72
1
347
3,449
Risiko: Windpark Steinlachtal - würden Sie investieren? Der Irrsinn, der hier Kreisfinanzierung geworden ist, sieht vor, dass Steuerzahler, die hohen Strompreise, die ihnen ohnehin aus ideologischen Gründen abverlangt werden, um weitere Zahlungen, die sie Betreibern von Windkraftanlagen über ihre Steuern überweisen, aufstocken, um den Bau und Betrieb von Windturbinen an Orten zu ermöglichen, die für den Betrieb von Windturbinen schlicht nicht geeignet sind. Und natürlich wird diese Subventionierung miserabler Standorte die Strompreise weiter in die Höhe treiben, und so weiter und so fort. Ein Ponzi-Scheme, das irgendwann aus den Fugen gerät und platzt... (Link im Kommentar)
2
4
1
14
460
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
So planen Merz und Klingbeil die Entwicklung der Ausgaben in den nächsten Jahren. Merken Sie etwas? Ich fürchte, die meisten Bürger merken nichts. Quelle: dserver.bundestag.de/btd/21/…
425
1,734
127
5,594
141,234
Kein Wunder, wer hätte je von einem Räuber gehört, der seine Beute genau beziffert hätte, damit ihn die Opfer seines Raubzuges dafür haftbar machen können...
Der Umfang der #Ukraineunterstützung bleibt #Geheimsache der Regierung: Wie viel bis 2030 bereits zugesagt oder gebunden ist, bleibt unter Verschluss: Die Bundesregierung stufte ihre Antwort als „Nur für den Dienstgebrauch“ ein.
5
218
Heute ist es wieder soweit: Bei Zeitumstellung lauert der Schlaganfall Junk Science und Focus unterhalten eine symbiotische Beziehung - Ohne Zeitumstellung gäb es 300.000 weniger Schlaganfälle, titelt der Focus. Nicht nur weniger Schlaganfälle, auch weniger Fette, also adipöse Zeitgenossen gäbe es, gäbe es keine Sommerzeit. Leider hat sich meine Hoffnung, meiner Arthritis im Knie mit der Abschaffung der Sommerzeit "adieu" sagen zu können, nicht erfüllt: Kein signifikanter Zusammenhang. (Link im Kommentar)
1
5
227
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
Elon Musk: You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech The side that is restricting freedom of speech you know, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That’s one of the signs that they’re the bad guys In fact, a restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed
905
3,093
267
10,913
450,787
Nailed it.
“He jailed socialists, so he wasn’t a socialist.” This is the argument every single person in my replies thinks is a mic drop. It’s actually the weakest one available, and it collapses in five seconds. Lenin banned the Mensheviks and the Socialist Revolutionaries. Both were socialist parties. By your logic, Lenin wasn’t a socialist. Stalin shot Bukharin, Zinoviev, Kamenev, and sent an ice axe through Trotsky’s skull. All of them were founding fathers of the Bolshevik revolution. By your logic, Stalin wasn’t a socialist. Mao purged Liu Shaoqi, the President of the People’s Republic, and let him die in a cell. Pol Pot murdered his own cadres by the thousands. Robespierre sent Danton to the guillotine, then got the guillotine himself. There’s a reason Vergniaud said the Revolution, like Saturn, devours its own children. Purging rival socialists isn’t evidence against collectivism. It’s one of its most reliable signatures. Why? Because when the state decides everything, there can only be one plan. Two factions with two plans for the same economy can’t coexist. One has to disappear. In a free society, disagreements get settled by markets and elections. In a planned society, they get settled by the secret police. Hitler crushing the SPD and the KPD, then murdering Röhm and Strasser in his own party, is exactly what you’d predict from a regime competing for the same thing: total control of the economy and of society. And that’s the real question. Not “what did he call himself” and not “who did he arrest”. The question is: who runs the economy? Under the Nazis, independent unions were abolished and replaced by a state labor front. Prices and wages were frozen by decree. Investment was directed by a Four-Year Plan. Private property existed on paper, as long as owners did exactly what the state told them to do. Hayek saw this in real time. He dedicated The Road to Serfdom “To the socialists of all parties” precisely because he understood that the planners of the left and the planners of the right were the same species. Collectivism isn’t a color on the political spectrum. It’s the belief that a central authority can and should direct the economy. Once you accept that, the purges, the camps and the one-party state aren’t accidents. They’re the operating manual. So no, “he jailed communists” doesn’t refute anything. Communists jailed communists for seventy years. Read Hayek. Then come back.
1
1
6
188
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 retweeted
“He jailed socialists, so he wasn’t a socialist.” This is the argument every single person in my replies thinks is a mic drop. It’s actually the weakest one available, and it collapses in five seconds. Lenin banned the Mensheviks and the Socialist Revolutionaries. Both were socialist parties. By your logic, Lenin wasn’t a socialist. Stalin shot Bukharin, Zinoviev, Kamenev, and sent an ice axe through Trotsky’s skull. All of them were founding fathers of the Bolshevik revolution. By your logic, Stalin wasn’t a socialist. Mao purged Liu Shaoqi, the President of the People’s Republic, and let him die in a cell. Pol Pot murdered his own cadres by the thousands. Robespierre sent Danton to the guillotine, then got the guillotine himself. There’s a reason Vergniaud said the Revolution, like Saturn, devours its own children. Purging rival socialists isn’t evidence against collectivism. It’s one of its most reliable signatures. Why? Because when the state decides everything, there can only be one plan. Two factions with two plans for the same economy can’t coexist. One has to disappear. In a free society, disagreements get settled by markets and elections. In a planned society, they get settled by the secret police. Hitler crushing the SPD and the KPD, then murdering Röhm and Strasser in his own party, is exactly what you’d predict from a regime competing for the same thing: total control of the economy and of society. And that’s the real question. Not “what did he call himself” and not “who did he arrest”. The question is: who runs the economy? Under the Nazis, independent unions were abolished and replaced by a state labor front. Prices and wages were frozen by decree. Investment was directed by a Four-Year Plan. Private property existed on paper, as long as owners did exactly what the state told them to do. Hayek saw this in real time. He dedicated The Road to Serfdom “To the socialists of all parties” precisely because he understood that the planners of the left and the planners of the right were the same species. Collectivism isn’t a color on the political spectrum. It’s the belief that a central authority can and should direct the economy. Once you accept that, the purges, the camps and the one-party state aren’t accidents. They’re the operating manual. So no, “he jailed communists” doesn’t refute anything. Communists jailed communists for seventy years. Read Hayek. Then come back.
This probably hits hard if you failed history in high school. Hitler was a far-Right fascist whose party was named the National Socialist German Workers' Party to attract working-class voters. Then he banned the Social Democratic and Communist parties, and sent socialists and communists to concentration camps.
272
1,141
92
4,927
89,513