Parker retweeted
Friends, abortion is murder.
Prophets and apostles of the Restoration have repeatedly used that word to describe the deliberate killing of children before birth. Consider these historical statements.
Orson Hyde stated:
“A skillful practitioner is employed to destroy the embryo offspring. This is murder” (Orson Hyde, JD 2:77).
John Taylor addressed the subject repeatedly:
“Men and women who are the murderers of their own infants by the thousands before or after birth” (John Taylor, JD 20:308).
He condemned “murderers, who destroy the life that God has given before and after birth” (John Taylor, JD 21:116).
He spoke of those who, “with their prenatal murders and other crimes, are slaying their thousands and tens of thousands with impunity” (John Taylor, JD 20:355).
“Many of these murders are committed while the children are prenatal; they kill them either before or after they are born” (John Taylor, JD 21:167).
After describing people “killing off their own children … before they are born,” he asked, “What are they doing now? Raising murderers and murderesses” (John Taylor, JD 23:19).
He described “human butchers in the shape of physicians to assist in this diabolical and murderous work” (John Taylor, JD 23:62).
He warned, “you will not commence your fashionable murders here” (John Taylor, JD 23:67).
“they have a fashionable way of murdering them—either before or after they come into the world” (John Taylor, JD 23:238).
He explicitly condemned “the murder of the innocents in the shape of feticide and infanticide” (John Taylor, JD 24:6).
After condemning “their hellish, murderous practices,” he declared, “No woman murderer, no man murderer can have a place among the Latter-day Saints” (John Taylor, JD 25:316–317).
Erastus Snow also condemned the practice:
“Today infanticide and feticide are popular. … child murder, this damnable doctrine of devils” (Erastus Snow, JD 23:230–231).
Joseph F. Smith spoke of:
“children murdered among them annually, either before or after their birth, by their own mothers or fathers” (Joseph F. Smith, JD 24:11).
George Q. Cannon described the same practice:
“women murder their offspring before they are born, are guilty of this prenatal murder” (George Q. Cannon, JD 26:14).
He also included men who sanctioned it, stating that such a man “shares in the crime of murder” (George Q. Cannon, JD 26:14–15).
The First Presidency issued this warning:
“And we again take this opportunity of warning the Latter-day Saints against those murderous and damning practices of foeticide and infanticide” (John Taylor and George Q. Cannon, First Presidency epistle, April 4, 1885, Messages of the First Presidency 3:11).
Joseph Fielding Smith stated it plainly:
“It is just as much murder to destroy life before as it is after birth” (Joseph Fielding Smith, Relief Society Magazine 3, no. 7, July 1916, p. 368).
So tell me again “the Church & the Lord doesn’t view abortion as murder.” 😂
Sure, Jan.
Parker retweeted
Today is the anniversary of the death of Alfred the Great, who died in 899. Famous for defending his kingdom against Viking invasion, Alfred also strove to rebuild learning and education among the English - to restore both their 'wealth and wisdom': aclerkofoxford.blogspot.com/…
Parker retweeted
I saw someone essentially say that pornographic/lewd Malfoid fanart is good because sex is the point of romance. THIS, I fear, is another example of the way pornography has damaged people. 🧵
That idea misses the entire point of the Malfoid trend at large. To be fair, Malfoid has gotten so big it broke containment and now means a lot of different things to a lot of different people. That being said, I think the vast majority of those who enjoy this trend agree that Malfoid isn’t about sex, it’s about yearning.
To yearn for something, to long for it, is to deeply and often melancholically desire it. That sense of melancholy often stems from the understanding that whatever the object of your desire is will be difficult to obtain. Men are yearning for Malfoid because finding a woman like her is incredibly difficult, but she’s worth it. People are writing stories, making art, and changing themselves for the better in an effort to even get close to the feeling of achievement - to get close to her.
Making pornographic art in this movement cheapens all of this. The object of desire becomes not the woman, but her body. The way to express this desire becomes not hard work and effort, but masturbation. Looking at images on a screen and allowing yourself to be titillated will poison your soul against improvement, and you will seek to get your jollies off however you can rather than by becoming the kind of man worthy of a Malfoid, or the kind of woman worthy of a Harry.
Certainly, it is true that Harry and Malfoid are sexually attracted to each other. It’s also true that the vast swaths of wonderful illustrators in this movement depict Malfoid as sexually attractive. But Malfoid being sexually attractive doesn’t innately reduce her to the point of objectification.
Beauty exists, and Malfoid is beautiful. This aspect of her character is a virtue - it’s something that men often find lacking in modern women. To be fair, it’s also a quality that women find lacking in modern men, so there’s blame to go around. But that’s why people have started going to the gym over this trend, in pursuit of beauty.
Beauty may also easily be corrupted. Because beauty is a virtue, it goes hand in hand with other virtues - love, self-control, modesty, etc. - and if any of these other virtues are lacking in a person, so too does their beauty. Portraying Malfoid as a loose woman, exposing herself and engaging in all kinds of indecency, makes her less beautiful. It may make her “hot” or otherwise “sexy”, but this is a pornographic debasing of her. Those depictions are not worth your desire.
Malfoid is modest, in both dress and in mannerism; of course she is, as the heiress to the Malfoy name. And the people who get the trend don’t portray her as a ditz or an airhead, but as a confident, even prideful woman (it’s worth noting that such depictions have her putting down her supremacist pride in her bloodline and accepting her love for Harry, humbling herself, which is a virtue).
Keep Malfoid modest. Yearn for something greater.
Parker retweeted
Ownership precedes stewardship. You can’t truly take care of something you’re just renting. Not a country. Not a man. Not a woman. Not a child. Not a car. Not a home. Not a river.
And yes you can own people when you love them. Thats why you say MY mom.
Parker retweeted
The signature carved wooden mice created by Robert "Mouseman" Thompson, a renowned British furniture maker from Kilburn, North Yorkshire.
Parker retweeted
High agency individuals with a good sense of humour and pure hearts and voracious appetites will inherit the earth
Parker retweeted
Two copies of The Coming of Arthur by @malcolmguite to give away, out Nov 9 from Rabbit Room
To enter: like, repost, and comment.
Winners Nov 2. US only.
Two more for Substack subscribers. Or preorder, if you’d rather not risk it. Links below.
Parker retweeted
“Patel? Khan? Now those are names that don’t sound like they were there on St. Crispin’s Day.”
Parker retweeted
If J.R.R. Tolkien was alive right now he'd already have written 500 lines of an epic poem celebrating the romance of Sir Harry Potter and the dark Lady Malfoy.
In Old English.
Harry Potter is a mythic retelling of the words of Christ: “Greater love has no man than this: that a man lay down his life for his friends”
Parker retweeted
Horror movies dominate both extremes of the quality spectrum. The bad ones are absolute rubbish (and are typically indulgently gory and dark for shock value only). The good ones, though, speak with brilliant clarity on what it means to be human, shadow and all.
Parker retweeted
I think there's something important about Christians being genuinely, visibly passionate about things like gaming, art, filmmaking, and music.
Sharing that joy with the world is an important part of your witness—and probably tells the world more about God than your passion for what you oppose.
Parker retweeted
You've heard of Michelagnelo but do you know Auguste Ottin? Here's one of his stunning works, Acis and Galatea, being attacked by the jealous giant Polyphemus (the one from the Odyssey). It was created in 1866.
Ottis was one of the academic artists of the late nineteenth century whom we hardly hear about above the noise about "the impressionists".
There is so much drama in this sculpture. Polyphemus has just discovered Galatea with Acis, he looms over them ready to attack. Meanwhile the lovers embrace, the idealised beauty of the human form frozen in marble.
It's astonishing that this wasn't made that long ago. This sculpture is in Paris, in the "Jardin du Luxembourg".
Parker retweeted
“The husband and wife should be similar to the hand and the eye. When the hand hurts, the eyes should be crying. And when the eyes cry, the hand wipes away the tears."
-St. John Chrysostom
My sphere is the Moon. I live near the border of Faerie, and I keep a lamp lit.
The medieval poets did not believe that the heavens fatalistically determined our future, but they did believe they each had a character that influenced the spiritual climate.
Take my short quiz to find out which sphere you most naturally belong to!
mythicmindfellowship.com/sph…













































