ִֶָ retweeted
also, note that since it's banned. victims of this can't cope with their partner by roleplaying, sex is also important for victims too.
They banned role-playing you twat. Actual incest and CSEM/CSAM is already banned. You're not very smart are ya? No one is mad that actual incest and csam are banned people are mad people ROLE-PLAYING got banned
1
3
143
ִֶָ retweeted
The majority of lolicons do not defend Shädbase at this point. Drawing someone’s real life daughter in a pornographic is past the point of separating fiction from reality.
unavailable
ִֶָ retweeted
“My trauma isn’t your kink” you do not own your trauma, your trauma shouldn’t personify you to the point that you make it your identity. Your trauma also happens to be something that millions of other people have gone through, and yes, they may not be a perfect victim like you.
ִֶָ retweeted
then let's never sexualise anything then. what if someone has trauma from being tied up? no bondage ever anymore! someone might have trauma from missionary. might as well ban that, too.
ִֶָ retweeted
"technically predators" these are fictional characters and they CANT BE PREDATORS because THEY DONT EXIST
unavailable
ִֶָ retweeted
I'm begging people to understand that ao3 deletes links to donation drives, patre0n, k0-fi etc. because it goes against TOS. The claim that they're deleting links to Palestine charities is bs because you can link to and mention any charity, you just can't link to donation drives
i don’t think i’ve ever seen anybody so idiotic and stupid in my entire life i’m deadass
Replying to @egmaa @FfTt51538640442
“cp” is not a thing because it is CSAM. you’re like talking to a brick wall
ִֶָ retweeted
The way the Democrats are gonna do yet another generational fumble and we'll have a red wave by this time 4 years from now
ִֶָ retweeted
Replying to @FfTt51538640442 @sensitivegoist
Yeah, pedophilia is ONLY sustained attraction to real prepubescent children
Words and labels like that shouldn’t be used as buzzwords against people for weird art, I think clinical terms relating to child safety should only apply to real world child safety issues, not weird art
ִֶָ retweeted
1. lily cannot be “underage.” she’s a fictional character. she doesn’t exist
2. but even by the logic of her being a child, she still cannot be one today, because she was 16 in 2022. she’s 20 in 2026
3. the art goes mainstream because duolingo attempted to censor it. the irony
ִֶָ retweeted
Yeah it turns out people care way more about the rights of real human beings to create what they want in the face of a corporation than they do about the age of a cartoon character.
Stop trying to give fictional objects human rights.

































