ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist) header
ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist) profile picture

like a boomerang

Joined August 2026
Photo by ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist)Photo by ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist)Photo by ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist)Photo by ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist)Photo by ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist)Photo by ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist)Photo by ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist)Photo by ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist)Photo by ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist)Photo by ִֶָ (@sensitivegoist)
ִֶָ retweeted
also, note that since it's banned. victims of this can't cope with their partner by roleplaying, sex is also important for victims too.
They banned role-playing you twat. Actual incest and CSEM/CSAM is already banned. You're not very smart are ya? No one is mad that actual incest and csam are banned people are mad people ROLE-PLAYING got banned
1
3
143
The majority of lolicons do not defend Shädbase at this point. Drawing someone’s real life daughter in a pornographic is past the point of separating fiction from reality.
unavailable
67
485
8
5,711
85,579
im not reading your dni to like a post
48
2,954
46
16,401
109,525
“My trauma isn’t your kink” you do not own your trauma, your trauma shouldn’t personify you to the point that you make it your identity. Your trauma also happens to be something that millions of other people have gone through, and yes, they may not be a perfect victim like you.
42
1,746
62
8,618
84,251
then let's never sexualise anything then. what if someone has trauma from being tied up? no bondage ever anymore! someone might have trauma from missionary. might as well ban that, too.
51
681
41
5,997
81,178
"technically predators" these are fictional characters and they CANT BE PREDATORS because THEY DONT EXIST
unavailable
7
156
4
1,187
12,757
Quit the Internet if you keep thinking so
It’s very common for pedos to deflect and blame others
2
479
8
2,643
15,513
ִֶָ retweeted
not fanart btw, this is official marketing from duolingo still up & posted today
163
1,513
164
41,556
1,221,404
I'm begging people to understand that ao3 deletes links to donation drives, patre0n, k0-fi etc. because it goes against TOS. The claim that they're deleting links to Palestine charities is bs because you can link to and mention any charity, you just can't link to donation drives
6
865
4
9,072
58,033
"don't sexualise my trauma" WHO ARE YOU. IT DOESNT BELONG TO YOU
57
1,757
111
10,000
212,844
ִֶָ retweeted
i don’t think i’ve ever seen anybody so idiotic and stupid in my entire life i’m deadass
“cp” is not a thing because it is CSAM. you’re like talking to a brick wall
1
1
1
55
ִֶָ retweeted
the POCD epidemic is getting absurd
They're jumping Duolingo cuz they don't want pedophile art of their character..
13
306
12
4,658
78,771
The way the Democrats are gonna do yet another generational fumble and we'll have a red wave by this time 4 years from now
1
1
8
226
Yeah, pedophilia is ONLY sustained attraction to real prepubescent children Words and labels like that shouldn’t be used as buzzwords against people for weird art, I think clinical terms relating to child safety should only apply to real world child safety issues, not weird art
1
1
1
24
276
ִֶָ retweeted
This is so dumb holy shit
19
190
73
1,675
22,495
They're made of paper
Hey guys so don’t sexualize the South Park children I didn’t realize this needed to be said but I’ve been seeing a lot more of it lately and it’s just weird If you do it with the adults, that’s fine, but they need to be at absolute minimum 18
3
3
1
20
756
ִֶָ retweeted
“Ex proshippers” talk about it like it was a drug. “Yeah I have been clean from cartoons for five years now!” As if looking at lines on a page is like shooting up heroin.
13
242
14
1,367
12,243
1. lily cannot be “underage.” she’s a fictional character. she doesn’t exist 2. but even by the logic of her being a child, she still cannot be one today, because she was 16 in 2022. she’s 20 in 2026 3. the art goes mainstream because duolingo attempted to censor it. the irony
Duolingo reportedly ordered an artist to remove inappropriate fan art of its goth teen mascot Lily One post had nearly 30 million views before being taken down
213
848
87
15,378
367,007
Yeah it turns out people care way more about the rights of real human beings to create what they want in the face of a corporation than they do about the age of a cartoon character. Stop trying to give fictional objects human rights.
Wait, people are seriously trying to defend the sexualization of an underage character?
10
319
3,383
22,189