🅂🄷🄴🄼🄸🄽🄰🅁🅈

Interesting how TNG did not really work when translated to the big screen, while for many if not most people Star Treks II, IV and VI are the best things the original crew appeared in.

L’EU doit être détruite + Nuremberg 2.0 du communisme ?

I don't understand how this is legal. If you walk into a tire center and order 4 tires for $1200 and they are 80,000 mile BFGoodwrench tires, then the next week, you go to have them put on and instead they install cheaper 20,000 mile house brand tires... And the tire center says, "these are costing us too much so we installed the 20,000 mile tires instead." And they refuse to give you a refund. There would literally be massive legal ramifications and the tire shop would be liable. I paid for a specific multiple of a specific amount after months of testing. Now that multiple has been cut in half, mid-cycle, with no warning. I would argue this is a direct violation of the FEC rules (16 CFR Part 238). Pricing pages and marketing made the multipliers look like fixed relative entitlements for the billing period, and the reduction was extreme and sudden with no notice, there is a colorable argument that the original offer was misleading. That is different from a pure “rate limits at our discretion” clause.

Sam Altman is actually right about this, and most people are missing the bigger picture. Think about how much RAM sits unused in hundreds of millions of personal computers every single day. People buy machines with 16GB, 32GB, or 64GB of RAM, yet most of that capacity is barely utilized for much of the day. Meanwhile, AI research, scientific computing, and cloud infrastructure are competing for the same limited global supply of memory. From an economic perspective, this is an incredibly inefficient allocation of resources. In a data center, memory can be pooled, shared, and continuously utilized by thousands of workloads. Instead of expensive hardware sitting idle for most of its lifespan, that same capacity can support services used by millions of people. Higher utilization means more computing output from the same physical resources, potentially lower costs per workload, and less pressure to manufacture additional hardware. This doesn't mean everyone should give up owning a computer. Local computing still matters for privacy, independence, latency, and offline access. But the fundamental principle is correct: maximizing individual ownership of scarce hardware isn't necessarily the same thing as maximizing its usefulness to society. The future of computing isn't just about who owns the most powerful hardware. It's about how efficiently we use the hardware humanity already has. >Add a sharper counterargument>Make the opening more attention-grabbing⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮

Dmitrij Miedwiediew, były prezydent Rosji, stwierdził, że w Polsce doszło do zamachu stanu, a “liberałowie Tuska, protegowanego Brukseli, uciskają konserwatystów z PiS”. I wszystko jasne.