If you want to try the Primus XP tasks yourself, start with my Kaito link: s.kaito.ai/umXCsGk. My direct Primus referral is points.primuslabs.xyz?ref=XV….

On public chains, anyone can read your balance. BNB Chain's docs describe a way for contracts to work with balances they cannot read. The page calls it blind computation. A contract processes encrypted balances and trades, and tokens can be wrapped one to one into confidential versions. The FHE layer is built around Zama, its status reads in development and its timeline reads TBD, so this is a design to watch and not something to use today. It also mentions viewing keys, which could give regulators access, and that detail is what makes it relevant to institutions. Privacy that regulators cannot be shown is a harder sell than privacy they can be shown. This is not abstract for me. @PipTradeDex is private by default, so who can see what is a design question I deal with directly. @primus_labs works with FHE as well, and I would like to see how different approaches decide who holds the viewing key. Who should hold it? Primus XP tasks, with my referral link: s.kaito.ai/umXCsGk

Glorious morning here

gKaito man I had some issues on my submission, I’ve sent mail since Friday and no response yet, any help

Happy new week. A new week means a fresh pile of headlines, and a fresh chance to decide what we actually believe about them. We read a headline, form an opinion and move on. There's no way to show how confident we actually are. @PRDCTR_IO describes Predictor as turning trusted media into live prediction markets. I like that framing. A story stops being something you only react to and becomes something you can take a position on, with a price that moves as new information lands. A crowd putting money behind outcomes tends to surface what people really believe, faster than polls or comment sections. The open question for me is source quality. Markets built on trusted reporting are only as strong as the reporting itself, so that's the part I'll be watching. Reply with the one headline you would back with a position this week, and tell me why.

this is my pain in the assssssss

The announcement is here: xitter.cf/grvt_io/status/2112530… and the press release is on Decrypt: decrypt.co/381412/grvt-burns…

Idle margin is a real cost on every exchange, and Grvt is going straight at it. In its announcement, @grvt_io shared a trader survey: six in ten respondents had at least a quarter of their platform capital sitting idle, and many moved funds elsewhere for yields of 8 percent or more. It is Grvt's own survey, so I read it as direction and not proof. Yield as Margin is the answer: eligible Earn balances usable as trading margin while still accruing yield, subject to product terms and risk parameters. It is planned for November, after Grvt Earn arrives at the end of October. This is the feature I am most excited about, because it turns idle collateral into working capital. The up to 11 percent figure is a target and not a guarantee, and it depends on the underlying assets, so I will be reading the risk parameters closely when they come out. Would you trade with margin that earns yield?

Security first

Yap yap yap

I don't even knopw the wallet that hold it again self, lol.

i am still holding, chai... i even borrow from @tycayomide to mint this back then.... omox100

Preparing for quantum is not the same as being done, so here is where @Starknet stands, label by label. Live on mainnet: Starknet v0.14.3 replaced Pedersen with a BLAKE2s-256-based construction for the OS program and config hashes. Demonstrated on mainnet: an OpenZeppelin Falcon-512 account. Published roadmap direction, not live: the contracts trie and contract-address derivation. Research: migration tooling for existing contracts that use Pedersen-based storage maps. External dependency: Ethereum blob data availability, which uses KZG commitments. Five labels, five kinds of progress. Mixing them up is how a project gets oversold or undersold, which is why I like that the Hub's register keeps them apart. The register itself, in the Migration section: quantum.starkware.co/ Next time someone says Starknet has done something post-quantum, ask which of these labels it carries.

The announcement is here: xitter.cf/grvt_io/status/2112530… and the press release is on Decrypt: decrypt.co/381412/grvt-burns…

Zero trading fees and one funding payment a day is a trader friendly cost model, and I want to see it live. Per @grvt_io, Stable Funding Perps are planned for November: perpetual futures on stocks, FX, commodities and indices, with zero trading fees and once-daily funding, and a target of more than 1,000 markets by the end of December 2026. The once-daily funding is what excites me most. Funding is the cost that quietly shapes a perp trade, and fewer funding events make a position easier to plan around. That is my reading of the design, since the funding formula has not been published yet. Trading stocks, FX, commodities and crypto from one self-custodial platform is the direction I want perp trading to go. The 1,000 plus markets figure is a target and the launch is still a plan, so I am looking forward to the first live markets. Would one funding payment a day change how you hold perps?

get in.

That thing 😉

Rarelist is here if you want to look first: rarelist.io