We are fighting against the erosion of freedom of expression in the UK.

London
Joined June 2025
Ordinary Brits can’t believe some of the speech arrests that have happened right here in the UK. How do we know that? Well, we’ve been asking them 🎥
46
246
13
1,361
120,653
The Online Safety Act has completely failed, and even Ofcom admits it. Do you think they're going to reverse course on the youth social media ban, another piece of legislation that will obviously fail? Don't get your hopes up!
🚨NEW: The Online Safety Act has been a failure, according to a new report from Ofcom. Ofcom have found "no significant change" in children encountering harmful content since the law came into effect last July. This is despite the signifigant threats to free speech and privacy.
1
10
64
774
October 2026 and people are STILL being investigated by the police for something as harmless as this...
1
6
213
The Green Living Forum - A forum for people who are trying to live sustainably. Aura Forums - A forum for fans of the Final Fantasy video game series. Eastleigh Online Discussion - A forum for people living in Eastleigh and the surrounding area. Just three examples of the kind of thing Big Brother Watch is talking about.
The Online Safety Act has made hosting community forums so laborious that they're closing shop. Hundreds of forums have shuttered due to piling paperwork and liability risks. Ordinary speech from ordinary people, gone. Read our report ⤵️ bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/campa…
2
5
391
So you're going to have to hand over your passport or driving license in order to join a public debate on social media. This isn't compatible with free speech - you shouldn't have to prove your identity to read ordinary legal content online.
Exclusive: Social media companies will be required to implement “hard checks” on people’s ages such as demanding passports or driving licences under plans to stop children from using their platforms The government is due to announce plans for a social media ban for under-16s in the coming weeks amid concerns that children are being exposed to harmful content Ministers want to take a harder line on age verification to ensure that children are not using the platforms after concerns that a similar social media ban in Australia has had little impact Under plans being considered by ministers, those using the sites will be required to submit their passports or driving licences or undergo credit checks to verify their age The Australian government admitted this year that more than 70 per cent of under-16s still had “some access” to platforms three months after the law changed in December 2025 Children reported that it was “easy” to circumvent the ban. They are only required to undergo basic screening — where users take a selfie and artificial intelligence estimates their age — to access platforms if they do not wish to upload official documents. In the most brazen cases, children were able to bypass the restrictions by drawing beards onto their faces Others have resorted to using virtual private networks (VPNs) to bypass checks by pretending they are based in another country, or pointing their phone’s camera at a screen showing an adult-looking face thetimes.com/article/9a7f374…
5
49
1
238
2,622
Look, we've posted this before. But it's a good video. The Online Safety Act has blocked so many things that shouldn't have been blocked, that we've managed to put together an A to Z of them! Check it out. 🎥
6
27
468
This is true. And it's nuts. The UK thinks it's in a position where it can demand that foreign companies comply with our absurd "online safety" laws (which in fact often deal with ordinary legal speech). It's not going to work. Companies will simply not pay the fines.
tually happens - the UK is demanding that websites in the US, with no legal presence in the UK, be censored, with threats of fines and prison. It's ridiculous.
4
16
1
111
3,726
It isn't surprising to hear Lisa Nandy call the social media ban a 'staging post'. But it's worrying. The ban is not evidence-based. It's ideology over evidence. The Online Safety Act is a failure. So why would the government want to crack down more on online activity?
3
32
1
97
1,953
On the one hand, it's good that Ed Miliband has said that it was never the intention to criminalise "elderly people, vicars and grannies" who have been arrested for holding up signs. On the other hand, this does rather suggest that the government did not understand the law.
2
15
342
The majority of Brits think that the government only protects speech it agrees with. Hopefully the Prime Minister will wake up and realise that free speech is about protecting all points of view, including those that are controversial or offensive.
"Our message to the Government is clear: defend the principle of free speech across the political spectrum and show the real leadership needed on the issue" Our polling reveals majority of Brits say gov only protects speech it agrees with More here ⬇️ independent.co.uk/news/uk/po…
1
5
29
699
There needs to be a reset on free speech in the UK. This new polling by @libertyhq is a big deal. People in this country want the Prime Minister to protect free speech - not crack down on it.
Free speech could cost Labour at the next election, new poll by @libertyhq reveals 3 in 5 Britons said that a party's position on free speech would affect how they vote. The evidence is on the table - @andyburnham, launch a free speech reset now. Read⤵️ theguardian.com/world/2026/s…
1
14
53
2,725
Absolutely. The Online Safety Act has been a disaster. Blocked content has included protest footage and famous paintings, and determined kids get around it anyway. The social media ban is more of the same.
I'm not sure why the UK thinks that the "social media ban" is going to go any better than the Online Safety Act. The (U.S.) services that comply, comply; VPN circumvention remains available; US services that refuse to comply will continue to be available.
19
93
2,422
The UK is clearly going down the path of banning social media for under-16s. Again and again, the evidence shows that these bans don't work. Kids get around them, but you still have to hand over ID to access ordinary legal content online.
🚨 NEW: The UK's social media ban for under-16s will come into effect from March 2027
2
29
101
1,858
The government might be on the verge of telling social media platforms to boost certain state-approved media outlets. That is terrifying.
1
6
14
1,003
There is no other way of putting it: the Online Safety Act FAILED. A year on from the child protection rollout, here’s our A-Z of some the most ridiculous things that were age-gated.
1
25
52
1,647
Free Speech Makes Britain Great 📢 🇬🇧 Free speech reset NOW @andyburnham It’s not a left/right issue. It’s a universal freedom for us ALL. The censorship must end - in public, at protests and online. Our billboards make clear: the British public have had enough of censorship
📢 Free speech is a fundamental right, core to our democracy & it's under attack Thousands are being arrested for controversial speech, online jokes & peaceful protest We've blasted the message to restore free speech across London, reaching the powerful in Westminster & beyond
7
104
282
9,072
France is trying again to ban social media for under-15s, after its first attempt was struck down for violating freedom of expression. Britain should take note. Blanket social media bans are a sweeping restriction on the ability to communicate and access information.
1
2
14
328
If only there was a case study - perhaps another country whose culture isn’t a million miles from our own - which could show any potential flaws in the planned under-16s social media ban. Oh, wait…
1
9
378
Welcome to the UK: a place where you can end up with a police record for whistling the Bob the Builder theme tune.
4
2
11
3,784
Hacks and leaks are an inevitability online. Is handing over your personal data to access sections of the internet really worth it? Particularly when young people are getting around the ban anyway…
4
323
Good question!
2
10
957