AgentStevens retweeted
SEC Nation is headed to Oxford for a massive SEC showdown…GEORGIA vs OLE MISS!
Two of the best teams in college football, major playoff implications, & one of the most iconic atmospheres in the SEC.
My 1st time experiencing The Grove, and I’ve heard there’s nothing quite like it!
AgentStevens retweeted
Mitchell Turner and Caleb Cunningham grew up in church together.
They'll be Ole Miss teammates in 2027.
Read: on3.com/teams/ole-miss-rebel…
Caleb Cunningham could have left. He stayed at Ole Miss. And the decision was pretty easy, actually.
“This is where I want to be, so I’m going to stay here.”
MORE: on3.com/teams/ole-miss-rebel…
Where’s @LSU @Lane_Kiffin ? Lol. Just different?
NEW: Most-watched College Football teams through Week 9📺
(via @nielsen)
on3.com/news/college-footbal…
AgentStevens retweeted
I said this before we played LSU, if you think you are being loud…. BE LOUDER 🗣️ 🗣️🗣️
Stomp your feet, clap your hands, do the Hokey Pokey, whatever you gotta do. Loud be loud alright 😊
Hotty Toddy!
I want to re-emphasize something:
If you’re going to the game Saturday and plan on using your Pom Pom more than your voice and clapping, please don’t bother going. Pom Poms don’t make noise.
I’ll repeat that again: Pom Poms do not make noise.
Make this the loudest game in VHS history. Thank you. Go Rebs.
Exactly 😂
Tesla has no government contracts and President Trump ended federal incentives for electric vehicles.
SpaceX contracts with the government are BOTH the best product AND the lowest price! Moreover government revenue will be less than 10% of SpaceX revenue this quarter and less then 5% a year from now.
Happy to cancel any that the government doesn’t want. Just say the word!
AgentStevens retweeted
Holy shit…
The DOJ just confirmed they working with the Super Intelligence Force Chair and Director of National Intelligence, Jay Clayton, to protect the homeland from bad actors.
They just pretty much told us they are using Super Intelligence and Quantum Computing to examine the election, as part of EO 13848.
ODNI+DOJ+DHS, with an assist from DOGE and other agencies.
DOJ LAUNCHES SUPER INTELLIGENCE TASK FORCE ⬇️
@POTUS Trump has made clear that “America stands at the forefront of a new technological revolution in intelligence,” and the Department will be a leader in safeguarding against malicious SI actors.
“The SI Task Force at the Department of Justice will facilitate our partnership with SI Force Chair Jay Clayton as we ensure critical SI technologies serve the American people and are not manipulated by bad actors at home or abroad. The Department of Justice will continue identifying and prosecuting individuals whose use of SI violates the law, including by maliciously targeting American taxpayers, critical U.S. infrastructure, or other aspects of our national security.” -@AGToddBlanche
Read more about the DOJ-SITF here: justice.gov/opa/pr/departmen…
AgentStevens retweeted
The data out of Texas is absolutely shocking… and I think President Trump set a trap.
Since 2018, Governor Greg Abbott has consistently received around the same number of votes. So did the Democrat party. The glaring anomaly is Gina Hinojosa..
In addition to this… according to a 2024 Election Administration and Voting Comprehensive Report found by @WallStreetApes teapawt.net/wallstreetapes/status/…— Texas processed 2,900,357 new valid voter registrations between 2022-2024 without proof of citizenship… 56.5% (more than HALF) of Texas voter registrations were classified as “new valid registrations.”
Report
eac.gov/sites/default/files/…
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
AgentStevens retweeted
This is maybe the most thorough and honest diagnosis of an election defeat that we’ve ever seen from a politician at Vance’s level. And he’s right.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
AgentStevens retweeted
Asked Caleb Cunningham about his decision to stay at Ole Miss:
“PG, that’s my guy. Then I knew we were bringing in a good receiver coach, Coach LD. Plus me being from Mississippi, I just wanted to stay home and represent this state. I knew my opportunity would come because I had faith in myself. I gotta give faith to God, I talk to him every night and I knew he was going to let me make the right decision – which as you could see I made the right decision. It wasn’t a hard decision at all. This is where I want to be, so I’m going to stay here.”
AgentStevens retweeted
Caleb Odom's brother, Kannon, suffered a brain injury at birth. Doctors were unsure how long he would live. Now 6-years-old, the family is planning Kannon's first trip to Vaught-Hemingway Stadium.
"(Kannon) is the completion of their circle."djournal.com/sports/college/…
AgentStevens retweeted
Ole Miss has won 16 straight games at home, the longest active home winning streak in the Power 4.
Since 2016, only Georgia, Alabama and Oklahoma have put together longer home winning streaks among current SEC programs.
🤖 Made with AI
AgentStevens retweeted
I’ll be bluntly honest here:
If there’s any fan out there that doesn’t realize the NIL era is completely different than the pre-NIL era, I can’t have a serious conversation with you.
College athletics will never be what it was before NIL. Never. We aren’t going back to 3 teams having a chance to win it all every year. Those times are long gone.
Replying to @EverythingRebs
Yall keep saying “since NIL” to fit your narrative and it’s actually hilarious. The best thing to happen to Ole Miss left you and pretty soon the players he brought will be gone too
AgentStevens retweeted
When Norvell took the job he basically chose FSU over Ole Miss. 99% of his colleagues would have done the same at the time.
Today maybe 5% would make that decision and 95% would pick Ole Miss.
The sport has changed a lot






































