The only way to outperform Bitcoin over a decade is buying $MSTR.
Everything else is noise.
6/10 years so far and $MSTR is comfortably winning.
Over the past couple days, I’ve asked two uncomfortable questions about $ASST.
Both times, instead of receiving reasoned answers, I’ve been met with personal abuse and insults.
What happened to Bitcoin’s ethos of independent thinking?
Apparently, “Don’t trust, verify” only applies until you start questioning the crowd’s favourite investment.
The moment you scrutinise a company they’ve become emotionally attached to, you’re suddenly the enemy.
I’m not here to blindly defend Strategy or attack Strive. I’m here to question capital allocation, credit quality and the claims being made to investors.
If asking basic financial questions makes people this angry, perhaps those questions need asking even more.
Why has Adam Livingston seemingly stopped promoting $MSTR and $MPJPY since joining Strive?
I thought Matt Cole said this wasn’t a competition?
If that’s true, why not promote all three?
Almost as if Dracula Cole knows attention drives capital and wants it flowing exclusively into $ASST and $SATA.
Adam’s once broad Bitcoin platform now looks like Dracula’s personal marketing department.
Quite clearly there is a competition.
It amazes me how Saylor is so oblivious to this.
Already back above $80k
It begs the question who was actually selling their $BTC below $80k?
Room temperature IQ individuals.
Why has Adam Livingston seemingly stopped promoting $MSTR and $MPJPY since joining Strive?
I thought Matt Cole said this wasn’t a competition?
If that’s true, why not promote all three?
Almost as if Dracula Cole knows attention drives capital and wants it flowing exclusively into $ASST and $SATA.
Adam’s once broad Bitcoin platform now looks like Dracula’s personal marketing department.
Quite clearly there is a competition.
It amazes me how Saylor is so oblivious to this.
A rare occasion where I agree with the $ASST bulls.
Strategy should consider retiring $STRD.
$STRF, $STRC and $STRK are all we need.
Each serves a distinct purpose, with unique strengths and a clear investor base.
And with daily dividends, I can see demand for all three growing significantly.
Sometimes a simpler product lineup is a stronger one.
Documenting Strategy retweeted
Our goal is to grow Bitcoin per share. Here’s how Strategy puts Digital Capital, Digital Credit, and Digital Equity to work. $MSTR
When will people start demanding Strive raise its dividend rate now $SATA is struggling to reach $100?
Or is that criticism reserved exclusively for Saylor?
Can someone explain why Strive holds $50M of $STRC on its balance sheet?
They’re collecting 12% from Strategy while offering preferreds paying 13–15%.
It makes no sense to me.
Six years of Bitcoin treasury companies.
Many have come. Many have gone.
One thing hasn’t changed.
$MSTR remains king. 👑
Ben could overlay a Bitcoin chart with his heart rate and find a historical pattern.
This isn’t analysis.
Who needs fundamentals, liquidity or market structure when you’ve got two squiggly lines and an imagination? 😂
Strategy built the world’s largest corporate Bitcoin treasury.
Strive has a prettier website.
The lengths people go to praise Strive and bash Strategy are getting embarrassing.
The @Strive website is leaps and bounds ahead of @Strategy
A simple and clear message, taking all forms of investors through a concise and informative story.
The MSTR website is a dog's breakfast of information and whilst informative, does not deliver the message that Strive is able to portray via less is more.
Their podcasts are also word class. Bullish both, however Strive has been on a tear the past 12 months.
@CJ_Bitcoin @PunterJeff
$MSTR just bounced off the 200-day SMA for the third time this week.
That liquidity sweep was a thing of beauty.
Paper hands spent all last week crying while the market was shaking out the weak.
Onwards.