
I am the commercial director at @BizNewsCom, parent, business enthusiast, entrepreneur, and lover of the 'Blues.' I also enjoy a good story.
Cape Town, South Africa
Joined October 2009
- Tweets27K
- Following3
- Followers1.4K
- Likes1.7K
Stuart Lowman retweeted
Coca-Cola withdraws race-based job ad after Solidariteit intervenes.
@BizNewsCOM @solidariteit
Stuart Lowman retweeted
The future of #F1?
Drop me out.
Stuart Lowman retweeted
We are sending our kids to school to memorize facts that AI can retrieve in 0.3 seconds.
We're grading them on essays that AI writes better than their teachers.
We're preparing them for jobs that won't exist by the time they graduate.
The entire education system is training humans to compete with machines at what machines do best.
That's not education. That's sabotage.
The schools that survive will teach thinking, not memorizing. Creating, not repeating. Discerning, not obeying.
Every other school is a museum that doesn't know it yet.
Stuart Lowman retweeted
Hey @elonmusk I've been thinking... What if the model that’s democratized share ownership for millions in SA, access for everyone, demographic alignment, trusted partners, with "rails" to more than 50% of our citizens, could help unlock Starlink’s EEIP path here (equity-equivalent investments advancing real empowerment)? @EasyEquities ready to explore synergies and do the work. Thoughts?”
Stuart Lowman retweeted
“If you don’t read the newspaper, you’re uninformed. If you do read it, you’re misinformed.”
— Denzel Washington
Stuart Lowman retweeted
$GOOGL what a business:
• $400B annual revenue
• $70B annual cloud revenue
• $60B YouTube revenue
• 10 billion tokens per minute
• 750 million Gemini monthly users
$GOOGL Q4 2025 earnings:
• Revenue $113.8B vs $111.5B Est.
• EPS $2.82 vs $2.64 Est.
• Google Cloud $17.7B vs $16.2B Est.
FY26 CapEx guidance: $180B vs $120B Est.
Stuart Lowman retweeted
Google is the biggest winner in the SpaceX IPO.
Back in January 2015, Google made a decision that most venture capitalists would call insanely risky.
They threw $900 million at SpaceX when the company was valued at just $12 billion.
Elon had recently figured out how to land rockets.
Starlink was literally just a PowerPoint deck.
The company was burning through cash like water trying to prove the entire concept of reusable rockets could actually work.
On paper, this looked like Google throwing away nearly a billion dollars on a moonshot.
But they saw something everyone else missed.
A founder willing to do the impossible and a company building what would become essential infrastructure for the next decade.
Fast forward to February 2026 and that single decision is about to make Google the biggest winner in what's shaping up to be the largest IPO in human history.
SpaceX is prepping for a mid June IPO at a $1.5 trillion valuation.
Google's 7.4% stake is about to be worth approximately $111 billion.
That's an increase of over $110 billion from their original $900 million investment.
To put it another way, every dollar Google invested just turned into roughly $123.
The reason Google deserves the title of biggest winner isn't just about the raw numbers, though those are absolutely staggering.
It's because they made this bet when nobody was paying attention.
SpaceX could have easily gone under.
In 2015, SpaceX had never successfully landed a rocket and recovered it.
The Falcon 9 had only been flying for a few years.
Starlink was a concept that most people in Silicon Valley thought was a distraction from the core business.
Revenue was basically nonexistent compared to today.
Yet Google saw the market opportunity.
A company with an effective monopoly on launching things to space at scale.
A founder with unlimited conviction and a business model that would become increasingly valuable as the world's data and compute needs exploded.
What makes this different from other venture capital wins is the sheer trajectory.
If you plot SpaceX's valuation from 2015 to 2026, it's almost vertical.
From $12 billion to $36 billion by 2020.
Then jumping to $100 billion by 2021.
$180 billion by 2023.
$210 billion by mid-2024.
$350 billion by late 2024.
Now sitting at $1 Trillion in February 2026.
The IPO target is $1.5 trillion.
Every year, the valuation roughly doubles or triples.
That's the kind of growth trajectory that only happens when you're building something genuinely transformative.
Google got to ride that entire wave with a single check.
The reason Google is the standout winner compared to other early shareholders is also about timing and positioning.
Fidelity Investments also made a big bet alongside Google in 2015.
They've obviously done well too.
But Google's stake is the single largest outside shareholder position after Elon.
They're getting the ability to influence a company that's basically becoming a fourth branch of government in terms of how critical space launch capability is.
No other private company can claim that level of control over orbital infrastructure.
Here's what's actually wild about this whole thing: most people don't even know this is happening.
Because SpaceX is a private company, Google's stake has been sitting on their balance sheet essentially at cost for a decade.
The gain has been completely hidden from casual observers.
But the moment SpaceX IPOs, that $111 billion position becomes real.
It shows up in earnings.
It fundamentally changes how people view Alphabet as an investment.
That's a massive catalyst that a lot of investors aren't positioned for.
What also makes Google the biggest winner is that they didn't need to take this risk and they knew it.
Google had mountains of cash.
They were already the dominant search company.
They could have just kept doing what they were doing and still been worth hundreds of billions of dollars.
But Sundar Pichai and the team at the time made a strategic bet that space infrastructure was going to matter.
They believed that reusable rockets would become foundational.
They were convinced that SpaceX was the only company that could pull it off.
They were right.
And now they're about to collect one of the largest venture capital payouts in history.
The other thing that makes this interesting is that Google gets strategic benefits on top of the equity upside.
By owning 7% of SpaceX, Google has visibility into the company's satellite internet plans.
They can negotiate favorable launch terms for their own ambitions in space.
They're essentially hedged into the space economy at scale.
As AI compute demands keep growing and data centers need more bandwidth, having ownership in the only company that can reliably launch satellites becomes incredibly valuable.
So Google is securing their own infrastructure future.
When the IPO closes in June and Google's stake becomes liquid and tradeable, we're going to see headlines everywhere.
Google turned less than a billion dollars into over $100 billion.
But the real story is that they had the foresight to make the bet when almost nobody believed in SpaceX.
They had the patience to hold it for a decade.
While the company became the most valuable private company on Earth.
That's what separates truly great venture capital wins from lucky bets.
Stuart Lowman retweeted
Jamie Dimon calls out the WEF to their faces...
The moderator:
"OK. We're running out of time."
Stuart Lowman retweeted
Legendary conversation between the Blackrock CEO & the CEO of Palantir Technologies,
This will be in history books one day:
Stuart Lowman retweeted
“Stocks are extremely risky in the short term, but extremely safe in the long term”
Stuart Lowman retweeted
"My name's Claudette. I'm 71. I drive the number 9 school bus, same route for sixteen years. Pick up kids at 7 a.m., drop them at school, repeat at 3 p.m. Most days it's just noise, backpacks, and asking kids to sit down forty times.
But I see patterns.
Like the boy in seat 14 who started getting on with wet hair every morning. Then soaking wet clothes. Then barefoot one day in October.
I pulled over. "Sweetie, where are your shoes?"
He looked down, embarrassed. "Water got shut off at home. Can't shower. My shoes got moldy."
Nine years old. Walking to the bus stop barefoot because his single dad lost his job and couldn't pay the water bill.
I drove to Walmart after my route. Bought him shoes. Size 3. Left them on his seat the next morning with a note, "Found these on the bus. Must be yours."
He wore them every day after that.
But then I noticed others. Girl wearing the same stained shirt three days straight. Boy who never brought lunch, stomach growling so loud I could hear it from the driver's seat. Kids who smelled unwashed, kids with holes in their backpacks.
So I started keeping things on the bus. A plastic bin under my seat. Clean socks. Granola bars. Soap. Deodorant. Hair ties. School supplies. I'd leave items on seats like I "found" them. Kids would take them quietly, never asking questions.
Parents started noticing. One mom stopped me. "My daughter came home with new crayons. She said you found them on the bus."
I nodded. "Lost and found."
She cried. "We can't afford school supplies right now. Thank you for not making her feel poor."
Word spread somehow. Other parents started leaving things. Backpacks. Jackets. Lunch boxes. "For the bus lost and found," they'd say. I'd distribute them to kids who needed them.
Then something bigger happened. The boy with the shoes, his name's Tyler, his dad got hired at a factory. First paycheck, he brought me $40. "For the lost and found," he said. "So other kids can find things too."
Now there's a whole system. A "bus pantry" at the school. Supplied by families who can, used by families who can't. No applications. No proof of need. Kids just take what they need from the bin, like finding lost items.
Other bus drivers started doing it. Twelve drivers in the district now. Feeding kids. Clothing kids. Giving them dignity disguised as coincidence.
I'm 71. I drive a yellow bus full of loud children.
But I learned this, poverty rides the school bus every single day. It sits in seat 14, seat 22, seat 7. And most people never see it because hungry kids get really good at hiding.
So pay attention. On buses, in classrooms, at pickup lines. Some child is barefoot. Some child is hungry. Some child needs someone to "find" exactly what they're missing.
Stock a bin. Leave supplies. Make poverty look like luck.
Because no child should feel ashamed for needing shoes."
.
Let this story reach more hearts....
.
Credit - unknown
Stuart Lowman retweeted
BREAKING: SpaceX has announced that @Starlink now has over 9 million customers, up from 8M in November and 7M in August 2025.
Starlink added a record 21,275 new customers on average per day since they hit 8M, smashing their previous record of 14,250. That growth rate is a whopping 49.3% higher than it was just last month! 🤯
Stuart Lowman retweeted
TESLA'S $2 TRILLION SECRET: THE CARS WERE JUST THE TROJAN HORSE
Tesla's stock just hit $450 after years of skeptics calling it overvalued for a "car company."
The skeptics were right about one thing: Tesla isn't a car company.
It never was.
The vehicles were just the data collection devices, the training ground, the Trojan horse for what's actually being built: the world's most advanced real-world AI that's about to make human labor optional.
Full Self-Driving V14 just achieved something nobody thought possible: intervention-free drives from Los Angeles to New York.
Not on highways with perfect lane markings, but through construction zones, unexpected detours, unmarked rural roads, and Manhattan traffic.
Tesla's fleet of 6 million vehicles has been training this AI with billions of miles of real-world data.
Every car is a teacher, every drive a lesson, every edge case captured and learned.
No other company has this data advantage, and they never will.
But here's what Wall Street is finally understanding: the same AI that navigates a two-ton vehicle through chaos can navigate a humanoid robot through a factory, kitchen, or hospital.
Optimus, Tesla's humanoid robot, uses identical neural networks, same vision system, same decision architecture.
The only difference is legs instead of wheels.
When you've solved vision and real-world navigation for cars, you've solved it for everything.
The economics are staggering.
Tesla's targeting $20,000 per Optimus unit at scale.
The global labor force is 3.5 billion people.
If Optimus replaces just 10% of human labor, that's 350 million units at $20,000 each: $7 trillion in revenue.
Not market cap. Revenue.
For context, Apple's total revenue last year was $380 billion.
Optimus could generate 18 times that from just partial market penetration.
Elon's prediction that Optimus will be bigger than everything else Tesla does combined isn't hyperbole; it's conservative.
Cars are a $3 trillion global market.
Labor is a $75 trillion market.
Every restaurant, warehouse, factory, hospital, and home becomes a potential customer.
Unlike cars that sit idle 95% of the time, robots work 24/7.
One Optimus could replace three human shifts.
The timeline is what nobody expected.
Optimus went from stumbling prototype to gracefully running in two years.
Tesla's manufacturing expertise means they can scale production faster than anyone.
They're already building the factories.
By 2027, Elon projects thousands of units. By 2030, millions.
This isn't theoretical anymore; it's industrial planning.
What investors are really betting on isn't Tesla's ability to make cars or even robots.
They're betting that Tesla has solved real-world AI while everyone else is still playing with chatbots.
Google's Waymo needs pre-mapped cities and perfect conditions.
Tesla's FSD works anywhere, instantly.
That's the difference between narrow AI and general intelligence applied to physical tasks.
The automotive business was never the destination; it was the funding mechanism and data pipeline for the actual product: artificial general intelligence for the physical world.
Every Tesla sold wasn't just a car purchase but an investment in training the AI that will fundamentally restructure human civilization.
The owners paid Tesla to build its true product.
We're watching the last pivot before everything changes.
Tesla's cars proved they could build quality hardware at scale.
FSD proved they could solve real-world AI.
Optimus will prove they can replace human physical labor.
The stock price isn't irrational exuberance; it's the market finally understanding that @Tesla owns the future of work itself.
Stuart Lowman retweeted
Ideology sucks. It numbs the brain. Some of our leaders are hellbent on working against SA’s interests because of ideology. We don’t care whether the cat is black or white as long as it catches mice. It is about economic growth. It is about jobs. It is about dignity. #ProudlySA





























