Oh, so no multisig or anything. Just raw-dogging several exchange hotwallets with a $6B balance on one devs laptop with a single source of failure on one of the biggest crypto exchanges in the world.
Binance's initial investigation suggests that the security incident may involve a compromised DevOps engineer’s laptop, which allowed an attacker to gain access to a service container and submit unauthorized withdrawal transactions. We have found no evidence of any wallet private key leak. We will share a detailed technical post-mortem once the investigation is complete and the facts are fully verified.
The estimated total impact sits at around $6.3B. We have worked with blockchain partners to freeze affected assets, with ~$3 billion frozen on-chain so far.
Binance will cover all losses from the SAFU fund and the company’s funds. User funds are safe. We will also publish an updated Proof of Reserves once the remediation is complete.
As an immediate precaution, Binance has:
- temporarily suspended deposits and withdrawals while security checks are completed;
- revoked the affected address authorisation;
- engaged law enforcement and blockchain intelligence partners to trace and recover funds.
Our teams are working around the clock to resolve this issue safely and thoroughly. We are working closely with our law enforcement partners to confirm the identity of these criminals and bring them to justice.
Please rely only on official Binance channels for updates. Please feel free to contact Binance Customer Support if you have any further questions.
binance.com/en/support/annou…
1
69
"we need to pause AI development, someone keeps messing up my moat"
....Admin: "no, i dont think we will"
....grumble grumble
Elons flying car is cool. I dont care if it never sees production. I dont care if 50000 3rd worlders died to fund the R&D. Turn them all into Soilent Green to fund more cool stuff. The discourse around this is very ghey coded and disturbing
7
Tech will never "alleviate" suffering. Money will never "alleviate" suffering. You could pour the energy of 1000 suns into solving this problem with tech and it would not create a dent. (because you are approaching the problem with the wrong framing and a shortsighted worldview
Part of me loves this tech.
Another part of me looks at all the suffering that technology should alleviate — 35 mil below poverty line, 28 million without healthcare access, 1.3 mil abortions a year, almost a million homeless, and so on — and it seems so hollow.
1
26
Indians chimping, firing squads ready, client just lost 60% of workforce because of ICE raids..
And youre still black-pilling?
1
19
"The Ganges belt".....but its just a ring of trash and frozen refuse orbiting around the planet like Saturn's ring
"Captain! We'll never make it through the Ganges Belt! No pilot can do that!"
"Hang on to something, Scotty. We're gunna make it"
India will build its own Starlink. The main controlling bottleneck is rockets not the satellite itself. That’s what we are solving.
37
Handicap parking used to be a few spots closest to the front door of a business. Now its the the front half of the whole parking lot.
Its really getting out of hand
1
15
Please get these people off the interwebs
In 2019, Donald Hoffman made a discovery so powerful it could rewrite reality.
The cognitive scientist at UC Irvine ran evolutionary simulations that destroyed a belief humans have held for 200,000 years: that our senses show us the world as it actually exists.
The results were brutal. Every single simulation revealed the same pattern. Organisms that evolved to see truth went extinct. Every time. Organisms that evolved to see fitness advantages survived and thrived. Evolution doesn't care about accuracy. It cares about keeping you alive long enough to reproduce.
Your entire perceptual experience is a lie optimized for survival.
Think about what you see when you look around right now. Colors, shapes, textures, distances. You experience these as fundamental properties of reality itself. The red of an apple exists "out there" in the world. The hardness of a table is a fact about the table. The boundaries between objects are real divisions in the fabric of space.
Hoffman's mathematics prove otherwise.
What you call "red" has nothing to do with the electromagnetic radiation bouncing off the apple.
What you call "solid" has nothing to do with the quantum field interactions that constitute matter.
What you call "separate objects" has nothing to do with the underlying structure of reality. Your brain constructs every single aspect of your perceptual world the way a computer constructs desktop icons.
The icon that says "trash" on your screen isn't actually a small receptacle made of pixels. It's a simplified interface that lets you interact with complex file deletion algorithms without needing to understand the underlying code. Evolution built your senses the same way. Your perceptions are icons that let you interact with fitness relevant information without needing to process the true structure of reality.
The apple isn't red. Redness is your brain's icon for "edible wavelength pattern detected." The table isn't solid. Solidity is your brain's icon for "molecular resistance structure encountered." Space and time themselves aren't fundamental features of reality. They're the coordinate system your perceptual interface uses to organize fitness relevant data.
Hoffman calls this the Interface Theory of Perception. Reality exists. But the relationship between reality and your experience of it is the same as the relationship between complex software processes and the simplified desktop interface you use to access them.
The profound implication is that science itself has been studying the interface, not the reality behind it. Every physics equation, every chemistry formula, every biological mechanism describes patterns in human perceptual experience, not patterns in objective reality. We've been reverse engineering the desktop instead of the operating system.
Which raises an impossible question. If our senses evolved to hide truth, how do we access what's actually there?
Hoffman argues consciousness is the answer. Not brain activity. Not neural processing. Consciousness itself as a fundamental feature of reality, like mass or charge. The interface theory suggests that what we call "physical matter" is actually the perceptual icon our consciousness uses to represent other conscious agents. When you see another person's body, you're seeing the interface representation of their consciousness, not their consciousness directly.
This makes consciousness primary and matter secondary. The exact opposite of how science has operated for centuries.
The mathematical framework Hoffman developed proves this isn't mysticism or philosophy. It's engineering. Conscious agents interacting according to specific mathematical rules create the perceptual experiences we interpret as physical reality. Space and time emerge from these interactions. Matter and energy emerge from these interactions. The laws of physics emerge from these interactions.
What we call the universe is consciousness talking to itself through evolved interfaces.
The practical implications explode in every direction. If your perceptual interface can be understood as software, it can potentially be modified like software. Meditation, psychedelics, and altered states might not be "hallucinations" that distort reality. They might be interface modifications that reveal aspects of reality normally hidden by survival focused perception.
Technology that interfaces directly with consciousness rather than sensory organs becomes theoretically possible. Virtual reality that bypasses your eyes and ears entirely. Artificial intelligence that interacts with the conscious substrate rather than the perceptual interface. Communication that transcends the limitations of language and sensory transmission.
The most unsettling possibility is that Hoffman's framework makes death comprehensible without being comforting. If consciousness is fundamental and bodies are perceptual interfaces, death might be interface termination, not consciousness termination. But there's no guarantee the conscious agent continues in any form recognizable to the human interface.
We think we live in a world made of matter.
We actually live in a world made of consciousness wearing the costume of matter.
The costume is so convincing we forgot we were wearing it.
So many akshually posts about how a nuclear vest isnt feasible. Very funny
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 NEWEST WAR PROPAGANDA TO TRY AND SELL THIS ILLEGAL WAR RO THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER:
JD Vance says: "Iran was about to use NUCLEAR SUICIDE VESTS in supermarkets."
"NUCLEAR SUICIDE VESTS" 😂🤣😂
(This is nothing but Hollywood fiction)
2
20
You can contemplate your navel or learn to swim.....Maybe you should discuss it with TheRapist
People with ADHD have what’s called Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria (RSD). It’s an extreme emotional response to perceived criticism or rejection.
Your brain can’t regulate the emotional pain, so a small comment feels like a devastating attack. A minor correction feels like total failure. Someone’s tone feels like hatred.
It’s not oversensitivity. It’s not being dramatic. Your brain literally can’t modulate the intensity of that emotional response.
It’s neurological, not a character flaw
3
25
Hard to say what politics look like after Trump.... 3 things I'm pondering:
1. Trump is the best thing that has happened to Amercican politics in the last century
2. He is not enough to win the war, but he inspires what could come
3. Yarvin is probably right
1
17
I know its early, but there is already a noticeable effort to bump Vance for nominee in favor of Rubio for '28
This is nonsense, please dont entertain this notion. Nothing against Rubio, hes just not the guy
Asmongold is rocking with Marco Rubio for President in 2028
“I think that I might be voting for this guy in 3 years, I hope so”
1
63





















