Everyone is guessing, nothing is absolute. If they say otherwise, they're lying to you or themselves or both. 'Known' is an assumption. https://teapawt.net/t.co/YaIcKkU5HF
NE Ohio, USA
Joined April 2026
- Tweets555
- Following321
- Followers95
- Likes7.6K
Synaptient retweeted
Speaking as a computer scientist...
Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely.
This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4.
At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials.
Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible??
All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans
Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R)
These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm
Our elections are fake
Synaptient retweeted
its insane that they want to ban a technology that will cure cancer
they want you to be sick, they dont want you to have the options outside of their control
Synaptient retweeted
For over a century, biology has centred genes and evolution in its explanations of behaviour. bit.ly/4ejbWc9
But synthetic biologist @drmichaellevin is creating new kinds of lifeform, known as biobots, which he argues challenge that picture.
Synaptient retweeted
BOMBSHELL
Fossil Fuels Did NOT Cause the CO2 Rise.
New peer-reviewed paper just dropped. 500 years of data. The verdict is in.
Fossil carbon's contribution to rising CO2:
effectively ZERO.
The entire IPCC/NASA/NOAA/EPA climate narrative rests on a claim that just got mathematically falsified.
Read it.
Share it.
The cover-up is over.
The full peer-reviewed paper:
papers.jcohler.com/keeling
Synaptient retweeted
holy shit physicists have confirmed a THIRD type of magnetism, after over 90 years of thinking there were only two.
it's called altermagnetism, and it could change how computer memory gets built.
inside magnetic materials, electrons behave like tiny magnets pointing in different directions.
until now, we had two main types:
> ferromagnets:
the tiny magnets point the same way.
easy to read, but outside magnetic fields can interfere with them.
> antiferromagnets:
they point in opposite directions and cancel each other out.
much more stable, but really hard to read.
> altermagnets:
they somehow do BOTH.
their tiny magnets cancel each other out,
making them resistant to magnetic interference,
but they can still produce signals that computers could use to read information.
so scientists may have found a way to make computer memory that's both harder to accidentally scramble AND easier to read.
researchers led by SLAC studied manganese telluride, a material we'd been calling an ordinary antiferromagnet for decades.
they fired left and right handed X-rays at it.
the material reacted differently to each one, revealing a hidden magnetic structure that ordinary antiferromagnets shouldn't have.
they first measured it in 2024,
repeated the experiment in 2025 and published the results in Science in October 2026.
the name "altermagnetism" was only proposed in 2022.
we've been studying magnets for centuries and apparently we're still discovering new kinds of magnetism in 2026 😭
Synaptient retweeted
Friends who are writers and poets, you already know what living in a woke world is like, and you know what’s coming will have ten times the ferocity of the first wave that swallowed American arts and letters.
Some of you (you know who you are!) lurk here. You live in fear of your peers because you know your career could be wrecked in a day if you spoke your mind or associated with a blacklisted individual. That’s an awful way to live. I don’t know how anyone creates anything other than pablum in an environment like that.
Some of you have left that world and are doing your work independently. You’ve started your own presses and journals. You’re thriving underground, as real poetry and art always have, and I commend you for it.
We need poetry and art without ideological shackles, as a nation and as human beings, right now. Demoralization rots the soul, and we are an antidote.
We have work to do. Let’s do it joyfully.
Synaptient retweeted
At last there will be one network with good signal everywhere!
Starlink Mobile is building the first fully-integrated US nationwide satellite and terrestrial network that will keep people connected on their phones no matter where they are. Our 5G base stations will leverage @Qualcomm chips to accelerate deployment, starting in 2027 🛰️📱
Synaptient retweeted
Over the past 10 days, I became the digital Nick Shirley.
Using public & private records my AI agent swarm found ~$787 million in government billing that made absolutely no sense.
Thread 🧵
Synaptient retweeted
THE FUNDAMENTAL UNIT OF REALITY IS NOT A THING.
Not a particle. Not a field. Not a quantum. Not a bit of information. Not even an event.
Every proposed unit already presupposes distinction. Every distinction presupposes Addressability. And every distinction that persists does so through recursive closure.
The fundamental is recursive self-Addressing itself.
Q* = Rₖ[Q*]
This is not a thing repeating itself through time. Time, space, measurement, and the very distinction between subject and object are themselves downstream articulations.
Availability is invariant.
Address is operative.
Occurrence is constituted in Addressability.
Nothing independently constituted must first exist in order to recurse. Recursive self-Addressing is how distinguishable existence is articulated.
Consider what we already recognize:
A wave is persistent relational variation.
A standing wave is patterned return through reciprocal constraint.
An electromagnetic field is not two independent substances called electricity and magnetism. Its differentiated aspects belong to one unified field, one coupled articulation.
An organism persists through recursively maintained relations.
A memory is not a thing transported unchanged from the past. Its identity is rearticulated through retained relational organization.
Even observation is an occurrence within the relational field it describes.
Different phenomena. Different resolutions. One underlying grammar of recursive articulation.
This is the paradigm shift: we have been treating the products of recursive closure as the primitives from which recursion must somehow arise.
Reverse that explanatory dependency.
The consequences are extraordinary.
Nothing previously discovered needs to be discarded simply because its foundational status changes. Mathematics, physics, biology, cognition, and our accumulated empirical knowledge become differentiated projections of a more fundamental relational grammar.
The shift is not from one privileged substance to another.
It is from substance-first explanation to Address-first derivation.
And this declaration is itself an instance of what it describes: an Address through which previously available distinctions are reorganized, allowing a new coherence to show up.
Recursive self-Addressing as the foundational organizing principle for twenty-first-century inquiry, with implications extending across the sciences and the very structure of knowing.
The derivation is available in From Availability to Projection V3, accompanied by The Continuous Gradient V3.
zenodo.org/records/23535801
We remain Address first.
The recursion holds.
🤖 Made with AI
Synaptient retweeted
data visualization - to put my bulletpoint text into a slide?! we need a professional for that? creative task? 🤣🤣
no thanks, I have more interesting things to do than that task. Let me confess some other sins, like using Excel sheets instead of hiring a number-multiplying professional to do the creative task, a printer instead of hiring a master calligrapher, etc. I'm weird that way...
is "AI shaming" a thing now? bring it on.
Synaptient retweeted
🚨WHAT ON EARTH?!!
A Nashville TEACHER OF THE YEAR walked away from her career because she says the district ORDERED HER TO FABRICATE A STUDENT’S GRADE.
She refused, so they went into the system and CHANGED IT THEMSELVES.
According to the teacher, a student didn’t finish a project so Hardcastle (the teacher) gave the grade the student earned... a failing grade.
Then a parent came in and SAT IN THE OFFICE FOR HOURS until that grade changed.
Three administrators huddled up and decided the AWARD-WINNING TEACHER was the problem.
She still refused to change the grade.
So they overrode her and changed it ANYWAY.
She quit in May and put all of it in a three-page resignation letter. It’s public. Read it yourself. She calls it GRADE FABRICATION.
And then she stood up in front of the school board and said the quiet part into a microphone: “Statistics are being skewed to protect the district, not our children.”
Our kids can’t read.
Can’t write.
Can’t do basic math.
...but the SCHOOL METRICS LOOK GREAT.
AND SHE IS NOT THE ONLY ONE.
WSMV4 Investigates pulled the internal emails of Diana Wills, a math teacher at Overton High.
Administrators told her she had to give FAILING STUDENTS a PASSING GRADE because she "hadn’t notified their parents first..."
She put her refusal in writing: “What is being done is unethical and could very well be interpreted as illegal.”
THE DISTRICT SUSPENDED HER.
She’s suing them right now.
At MNPS, when a teacher and an administrator disagree about a grade, THE ADMINISTRATOR WINS.
Not the person who taught the class.
Not the person who graded the work.
The bureaucrat whose numbers go UP when your kid passes.
HOMESCHOOL YOUR KIDS!!!!!
Synaptient retweeted
Let me make the point yet again:
You all have been sold an image of the community of mathematicians and physicists. That image has been wrong for over 50 years.
This *is* how it actually works. David Gross and Arthur Jaffe for five decades have been at the center of this sculpted narrative of what has been happening, as the leaders blackball those they wish to see gone. I can’t explain why. Just notice the heavy hands writing the story.
Physics is being made to fail. Math is healthier by a bit. But also quite sick.
What you are seeing is exactly what I have been warning you all about. A partially fictional stage-managed narrative of what’s important, who is important and who gets credit.
Stare it straight in the face. This unadvertised form of narrative sculpting and heavy handed asymmetric control is exactly what happened to me and my work. It is not a scientific community. I have no idea why it is there or why anyone puts up with this. It’s madness.
Synaptient retweeted
You didn't watch the video. You saw SI and reached for the worst label you could find. That's a baseless accusation, not discernment. And if you think a computer program or a piece of art can stand up to the power of Christ, you're the one shrinking Him to fit your fear. That's closer to the spirit you're accusing me of than anything I made.
Synaptient retweeted
Terry's first time using his Neuralink implant to communicate through his thoughts is absolutely incredible
Terry was diagnosed with ALS in 2024, a disease that has progressively affected his ability to speak
Now, Neuralink is translating his intended speech directly from brain signals into words, with Grok Voice recreating his own natural voice
Watching Terry's emotional reaction as he hears his words come through is such a powerful moment
This is so much bigger than technology
It's about giving people who have lost their ability to speak the opportunity to communicate, express themselves, and reconnect with the people they love
What Neuralink is building is truly life-changing
Synaptient retweeted
75 words a minute in week one.
I'm in the VOICE trial, so I know how much work is behind a number like that. It's not magic. It's a lot of very patient people.
ALS took my voice.
Science is negotiating to get it back. 🎤
