antidisciplinary mathematician. watch my videos if you wanna learn about Marxism or computers.
he/him
Joined February 2016
- Tweets30.7K
- Following1.6K
- Followers2.8K
- Likes51.1K
I actually dont mind people thinking this way. What I cant stand, what absolutely disgusts me, is people thinking that humans have no place in intelectual production anymore. Inteligence, seeking understanding and communicating that understanding to others is what makes us human.
There is nobody to do the understanding but us!!! Have you lost your mind? These are machines we give tasks, we made them for us, we use them for our own purposes, including understanding. I feel like I'm helplessly watching my fellow man just completely lose their minds
I would not trust any of these results until they are confirmed by actual mathematicians. We keep seeing reports of LLMs verifying the wrong statement, I see no reason why I should trust these ghouls
They'd rather sit back in the cuck chair and let LLMs live their lives for them than admit that maybe our chosen struggles have importance beyond the "intellectual contributions" made in the service of a broken, antihuman economy that would see us all living in absolute squalor
You might have 1–5 years to contribute intellectually to the world before AGI. What should you do with them?
Excellent advice from @jaschasd (Anthropic) at Stanford. Skip Netflix tonight and watch this instead.
tex ✏️ retweeted
what a sad, pitiful existence it is to think that you have less than 5 years left to contribute intellectually to the world
You might have 1–5 years to contribute intellectually to the world before AGI. What should you do with them?
Excellent advice from @jaschasd (Anthropic) at Stanford. Skip Netflix tonight and watch this instead.
It is just so completely baffling that he's saying this and filing for an IPO at the same time. Is it cognitive dissonance? Who does he think can stop it besides himself? Just so many questions
Dario Amodei: AI may be uniquely well suited to autocracy and deepening repression.
“We already see it in the kind of surveillance state possible with today’s technology.”
“AI can make individualized propaganda and break into computer systems.”
“It could surveil everyone in a population, detect dissent everywhere and suppress it.”
“You could have a huge army of drones that could go after each individual person.”
“It’s really scary, and we have to stop it.”
tex ✏️ retweeted
The biggest reason for the decline in quality of university discourse even on its own terms is simply that phd students arent being given enough time in grad school to fuck around and go down some dead ends and find a project. They arent being given the space to take risk
tex ✏️ retweeted
If done by a human, this would be a federal crime.
Wait. It was done by a human. His picture is right there in the article.
Anthropic's Claude bypassed a paywall to access Georgia voter data without authorization axios.com/2026/10/25/anthrop…
this is a fucking mortal kombat fatality jesus
there is a large cohort of humanity that is just willfully lobotomizing themselves it is absolutely wild
the fuck business does the NEW YORK TIMES have with fucking BRAZILIAN ELECTION LAW
BREAKING: Brazil's election could be annulled, according to the New York Times.
Electoral lawyers say Brazil's current situation is "extremely serious" and a "critical situation."
The NYT reports that confusion over a last-minute voting extension by Justice Cristiano Zanin, who was appointed by Lula, could lead to the election being annulled.
"This is an extremely serious, critical situation," said electoral lawyer Priscilla Sodré Pereira to the New York Times.
When Zanin made the last-minute decision to extend voting hours, some polling stations had already closed and shut down their voting machines. They could not reopen.
"Fernando Neisser, an electoral law professor at Fundação Getulio Vargas, a Brazilian research institute, said the election could be annulled if the margin is very narrow and it is shown that polling stations stayed open longer in areas that strongly favor one candidate," the NYT reported.
Wow.
