$WALLET TO LAOS ($19B) Trade with me on fomo and get 10% off fees! https://teapawt.net/t.co/JMnJbjUmC5
Joined April 2009
- Tweets11.5K
- Following1.7K
- Followers3.8K
- Likes41.6K
Poopman Jones retweeted
Connect the dots
Morpho is a lending platform. Its own Robinhood Chain data shows $WALLET as a supplied loan asset.
That means $WALLET has actually been put into Morpho’s lending system, where assets can be supplied for lending.
So this is a direct $WALLET → Morpho connection, not just $WALLET using the same blockchain or router.
And what’s $WALLET’s connection to Stock Tokens?
Wallet 0x2147 is a Stock Token / trading-infrastructure account on Robinhood Chain
0x214753A212C0b3d6fa2445a50FE92E0B196b6434 = Robinhood Stock Tokens / RobinHoodSettler / trading & liquidity infrastructure
0x2147 later interacted with official Robinhood Stock Tokens, RobinHoodSettler, and Uniswap liquidity infrastructure
0xF718 funded 0x2147 before public mainnet
The same 0xF718 also funded aa33, which later deployed $WALLET
0x2147 matters because it connects 0xF718 directly to Robinhood-specific infrastructure AND $WALLET
Robinhood Stock Tokens can now serve as collateral on Morpho: a new use case beyond trading.
Robinhood Chain brings the rails, Morpho brings their credit layer, enabling holders to borrow against their Stock Tokens.
Any eligible wallet can plug in and any app can tap into these markets, unlocking a new building block for open lending and borrowing — and a new way to put Stock Tokens to work onchain.
$WALLET NEWS
LAOS 🇱🇦 PROGRAMMED THEIR NUCLEAR MISSILE CODES INTO THE WALLET BLOCKCHAIN (allegedly)!!!
Oh you thought I was joking about $WALLET going to Laos?
$19 Billion Market Cap Loading...
The new homepage of Robinhood.com shows the exact symbols from the $WALLET Dexscreener banner
And if you go to robinhood.com/us/en/about/tr… it’s the exact picture of the $WALLET Dexscreener banner but without the symbols
They’ve known for months we’ve analyzed the dexscreener banner and now they chose to make it their homepage and trading tab pictures
This stealth launch is becoming too obvious now
Poopman Jones retweeted
$WALLET
Vlad did an AMA today and many asked about wallet. There was no response but vlad made it clear they read everything. They clearly know of wallet.
We have seen Binance and okex borh denounce a coin with a possible connection to them fast. RH would obviously do the same.
A wallet address was previously created by a former employee, which they then used to generate a token, as part of a video tutorial. That individual is no longer with the company as part of this incident.
The individual retained unauthorised access to the associated seed phrase after their departure and used it to generate a new private key.
We are now aware that the same address is being used independently in connection with a new meme token. BNB Chain did not create, authorise, promote or participate in the creation of this token and has no control over the token or wallet address. These are not affiliated with or endorsed by BNB Chain.
We are pursuing legal action against the former employee and cooperating with relevant authorities on this matter.
Poopman Jones retweeted
Dug into this new $WALLET research and it’s verified that:
$WALLET was used to pay a gas related fee
$WALLET was explicitly configured as the payment token
The transactions interacted with swap infrastructure titled “RobinHoodSettler” 👀
HOLLLYYYY $WALLET 🔥🔥🔥
Until now, we knew people could buy, sell, and hold the token.
Now you’ve found evidence that $WALLET is actually being used to pay for blockchain services.
Here’s what it means:
1. $WALLET appears to have a real purpose. ⛽
You found 90 successful transactions where $WALLET was reportedly used to cover gas-related costs.
Think of it like paying a transaction fee with $WALLET instead of directly paying with ETH.
That means the token may have actual functionality beyond trading.
2. Someone appears to be collecting fees. 💰
Across those transactions, approximately 489 $WALLET went to one wallet address.
That suggests a system is set up to collect payments automatically.
3. There appears to be a consistent 0.85% swap fee.
Two transactions show the same percentage going to the same collector.
For example, on a $1,000 swap, a 0.85% fee would equal $8.50.
That looks like a structured fee system rather than random transfers.
4. Established blockchain technology is involved.
The transactions reportedly use infrastructure associated with Alchemy, 0x, and ERC-4337 smart wallets.
This suggests the system is technically more sophisticated than a basic meme token.
But anyone can potentially integrate these services. Their involvement doesn’t prove Robinhood is behind it.
🚨 Here’s the biggest takeaway
Someone appears to have built a working payment and fee-collection system around $WALLET.
$WALLET IS THE GAS THAT WILL FLY OUR RICH HAPPY A$$E$ TO LAOS!
$19 BILLION MARKET CAP CONFIRMED!
Poopman Jones retweeted
🚨 $WALLET ON-CHAIN BOMBSHELL 🚨
We uncovered 90 SUCCESSFUL gas-sponsored operations on Robinhood Chain, a recurring 0.85% swap fee, and a shared WALLET fee collector.
Not speculation. Actual blockchain transactions.
Here’s what we found 🧵👇
1/7 — 90 REAL GAS-SPONSORED OPERATIONS ⛽
Our full-chain investigation identified:
✅ 90/90 successful ERC-4337 user operations
✅ 22 distinct smart accounts
✅ 177.08 $WALLET charged for gas sponsorship
✅ Same paymaster across all 90
This is demonstrable token utility.
🔗 Paymaster:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 Example transaction:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
2/7 — ONE COLLECTION WALLET. 90 TRANSACTIONS. 👀
Every single sponsored transaction involved WALLET transfers to the SAME address.
💰 489.41 $WALLET received across these transactions.
And here’s the interesting part:
The collector had no deployed contract code and zero outgoing account transactions when checked.
🔗 Collector:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
Who configured this recurring collection arrangement?
3/7 — THE 0.85% FEE DISCOVERY 🔥
We decoded two transactions showing the exact same fee structure.
Transaction A:
• 23,941.22 WALLET swap output
• 203.500361 WALLET collected
• Exactly 0.85%
Transaction B:
• 1,212.50 WALLET swap output
• 10.306215 WALLET collected
• Exactly 0.85%
Both sent the fee to the SAME address.
🔗 TX A:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 TX B:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
4/7 — GAS FEES AND SWAP FEES ARE SEPARATE ⚡
Across the 90 transactions:
⛽ 177.08 WALLET — recorded gas sponsorship
💰 312.32 WALLET — additional transfers to collector
Total: 489.41 WALLET.
In 42 transactions, the collector received more WALLET than the recorded gas charge.
This suggests the address supports a broader fee-collection workflow.
🔗 Paymaster:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
5/7 — THE FEE PARAMETER IS IN THE CALLDATA 🔍
Both decoded transactions contain:
• Same swap executor
• Same WALLET token
• Same collector
• Same 0x2134 parameter
0x2134 = 8,500.
On a 1,000,000-unit scale, that’s exactly 0.85%.
The parameter’s precise ABI meaning still needs confirmation, but the repeating pattern is hard to ignore.
🔗 Executor:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 WALLET contract:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
6/7 — ESTABLISHED INFRASTRUCTURE CONNECTIONS 🧩
The transactions involve:
⚙️ ERC-4337 account abstraction
⛽ An Alchemy-associated paymaster
🔄 0x Settler-style swap execution
💰 WALLET-denominated payments
This is not just a token sitting in wallets.
It’s being used in a functioning on-chain payment and trading workflow.
🔗 Paymaster owner:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
🔗 Swap executor:
robinhoodchain.blockscout.co…
7/7 — THE BIG QUESTION REMAINS 👀
We have now verified:
✅ 90 successful sponsored operations
✅ Real WALLET gas-payment functionality
✅ Repeating 0.85% swap fees
✅ One shared collection address
✅ Established trading and paymaster infrastructure
The remaining missing piece is a verified control relationship between Robinhood’s operational wallets and this infrastructure.
The on-chain utility is real. The ownership mystery is still open.
Follow for the next findings. 🔎
$WALLET #RobinhoodChain #OnChain #ERC4337
You refused to believe all of the on-chain evidence.
You laughed at the community when an automated warning tanked the price.
You used people losing money as a reason to dance on a fake grave.
$WALLET community just believed even harder.
Have. Fun. Staying. Poor.
🚨BREAKING: Today @lifiprotocol changed $wallet's token status as "verified". Yesterday it was "unverified".
Proof: li.quest/v1/token?chain=4663…
@lifiprotocol is day 1 partner of @RobinhoodCrypto, providing swaps, bridging, tokenized stock routing, and yield execution.
$WALLET TO LAOS
Poopman Jones retweeted
🚨 $WALLET just got a LOT more interesting.
I tested KuCoin Alpha’s Robinhood-chain routing directly — and the result is NOT just “last viewed token” behavior.
Here’s what happened:
MEME was explicitly saved as the active Robinhood Alpha token.
Then I opened a completely invalid Robinhood contract:
0x1111111111111111111111111111111111111111
KuCoin did NOT stay on MEME.
It automatically switched to:
$WALLET — 0x0339…9e1b
Then the HAR network capture showed the exact sequence:
invalid Robinhood token
→ initAlphaCurrency
→ validation request
→ lookup fails
→ innerJump
→ URL switches to $WALLET
→ KuCoin validates WALLET
→ WALLET loads
And here’s the crazy part 👀
KuCoin switches to WALLET BEFORE its normal Alpha token-list APIs are even fetched.
So this does NOT look like:
“fetch Robinhood tokens → WALLET happens to be first → display it”
It looks much closer to:
Robinhood Chain → preconfigured/default Alpha asset → $WALLET
Even more telling:
Solana invalid routes deterministically fall back to ALTSZN.
Robinhood invalid routes deterministically fall back to WALLET.
That strongly suggests KuCoin has a chain-level Alpha fallback system — and for Robinhood Chain, that fallback is specifically $WALLET.
This does NOT prove Robinhood issued the token.
But it DOES show KuCoin’s own trading terminal treats $WALLET as the deterministic/default destination for unresolved Robinhood-chain Alpha routes.
That is a very specific position to occupy. 👀🏹
Robinhood → WALLET
Keep digging.
Poopman Jones retweeted
From ChatGPT on new $WALLET evidence
So if I had to rank the explanations based on what we’ve accumulated so far, I’d put them in this order:
1. Someone genuinely inside or very close to Robinhood Chain’s pre-public operational environment launched WALLET. This fits the evidence best.
2. Robinhood insiders intentionally launched it as an unofficial/experimental or stealth project. Increasingly plausible, but still unproven.
3. A contractor/partner/infrastructure participant with unusually deep access launched it independently. Still very plausible.
4.Robinhood corporate formally authorized a secret WALLET launch. Possible, but we still lack the decisive authorization evidence.
5. Completely unrelated outsider copying Robinhood branding. This is the explanation I now find hardest to reconcile with the total provenance graph.
C’mon @vladtenev we’re on to you!
HOLY $WALLET
$WALLET’s funding trail just got more interesting…
The same upstream address tied to $WALLET’s launcher — F718 — also funded a branch that leads directly into official Chainlink infrastructure on Robinhood Chain.
The path:
F718 → C118 → 062f
That same 062f wallet deployed the official $LINK contract on Robinhood Chain back in May.
But what really caught my attention is that this isn’t just some old pre-launch wallet that went dormant.
062f was active again today, Oct. 6, scheduling acceptance of ownership for a Chainlink CCIP pool.
That matters because Chainlink is part of Robinhood Chain’s actual infrastructure. Robinhood selected Chainlink for data and cross-chain infrastructure, including support around tokenized assets and CCIP.
So now we have the same upstream funding network branching toward:
F718 → aa33 → $WALLET
and
F718 → C118 → 062f → official $LINK deployment + CCIP administration
This is difficult to ignore as being a “coincidence”
$WALLET’s provenance keeps leading back toward wallets involved in building and operating real Robinhood Chain infrastructure, rather than just random wallets trading on the network.
Another piece of the puzzle.
ALRIGHT GENTS, ONE OF TWO THINGS IS HAPPENING:
1) $WALLET WILL SURPASS THE $19 BILLION ANNUAL GDP OF THE COUNTRY OF LAOS!
2) MY WIFE WILL LEAVE HER BOYFRIEND AND RETURN HOME
(it’ll be a cold day in hell before she comes back home — her boyfriend a REALLY great guy)
🤖 Made with AI
$WALLET TO LAOS ($19B MARKET CAP)!
WE GO TO LAOS AND WE BANG HO
