Pinned Tweet
We're joining @authorea to create a place for researchers to write, cite, collaborate, host data, and now publish! thewinnower.com/posts/the-wi…
the Winnower retweeted
Hello world! We're scite.ai, a platform that allows anyone to see if a scientific report has been supported or contradicted by subsequent work. We're now OPEN! medium.com/scite/scite-makin… #science #deeplearning #openscience
the Winnower retweeted
This is a very cool tool, that classifies citations as supporting, contradicting, or just mentioning in papers. It's available at scite.ai
I can't wait to peruse and use. #ASAPBio #openscience #publishing
So... this is cool! Have been working to build a tool that classifies citations as supporting, contradicting, or just mentioning. Go to check my own work and I see a recent publication supporting me! #openscience scite.ai
the Winnower retweeted
Just got my beta access to @sciteai . Pretty cool! E.g. here are five studies that confirm different gene phenotypes observed in our P. berghei barseq screen. A language model recognises whether the citations are confirmatory, contradictory or neutral.
the Winnower retweeted
The latest episode of the Undark #podcast covers using social media in search and rescue, developing a more accurate way to track citations, and tackling sexual harassment in science. Listen to the full episode here: buff.ly/2I0Y9Zi
the Winnower retweeted
Opinion: Thousands of research papers are published each year. Citations are a poor way to gauge their scientific rigor. AI and a network of human experts can do the job. buff.ly/2QsWDEJ
the Winnower retweeted
THREAD: In 1980 the New England Journal of Medicine published a letter with the finding:
"We conclude that despite widespread use of narcotic drugs in hospitals, the development of addiction is rare in medical patients with no history of addiction."
nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NE…
the Winnower retweeted
Top #tweeted story in #structbio: Praxis of Reproducible Computational Science - Authorea authorea.com/users/34995/art…, see more tweetedtimes.com/v/1344?s=tn…
the Winnower retweeted
"We’re introducing this capability with scite.ai, a new tool that allows researchers to see how a research paper has been cited, not simply how many times it has been cited." medium.com/@sciteai/super-po… #openscience #ai #oa #scholcomm
the Winnower retweeted
Hello world! We're scite.ai, a platform that allows you to search any research article in order to see how it has been cited, specifically if it has been supported or refuted. Launching soon! #science #reproducibility #openscience
the Winnower retweeted
We've built an automatic way to identify if a paper has been supported or refuted. Interested in being an early tester? Sign up here: scite.ai/ #openscience #scholcomm #oa
the Winnower retweeted
I want to share a preview of something I have been working on with some amazing folks. In short, we're trying to tackle information overload and information reliability in research. #openscience #startups
the Winnower retweeted
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
the Winnower retweeted
"Would a similar ruse work in the world of scientific journal reviews? Would editors and reviewers fail to recognize already-published articles in their own journals by top authors and go on to reject them?" thewinnower.com/discussions/…
the Winnower retweeted
bioRxiv now provides links to preprint discussion sites below articles :-) e.g. biorxiv.org/content/early/20…
biorxiv.org/content/early/20…
biorxiv.org/content/early/20…
biorxiv.org/content/early/20…
cc @preLights @biOverlay @PREreview_ @AcademicKarma
the Winnower retweeted
Can confirm. The following events happened, in order:
1. I submitted a paper.
2. My wife became pregnant with our first child.
3. My child was born.
4. My paper was rejected.
MY WIFE LITERALLY GREW A HUMAN IN THE TIME IT TOOK THEM TO REJECT MY PAPER. teapawt.net/joshmnicholson/status/…
You can have a child quicker than you can report your scientific findings. Maybe this would be okay if peer review was actually effective in weeding out errors but it's not.
Paper: nature.com/articles/nature25…
Critique on PR: breast-cancer-research.biome…
the Winnower retweeted
Congrats to The Journal of Sketching Science team! So excited to support this initiative #openscience #scicomm teapawt.net/sketchscience/status/9…
Our first Sketching Science paper!
Jet-lag? Blame your body's clock... Read more at:
journal.sketchingscience.org…
By @heysciencesam and @neto_flames
the Winnower retweeted
Our first Sketching Science paper!
Jet-lag? Blame your body's clock... Read more at:
journal.sketchingscience.org…
By @heysciencesam and @neto_flames
the Winnower retweeted
Launched yesterday, The Journal of Sketching Science is a new scholarly platform that takes complex scientific research and summarises it using illustrations.
chemistryworld.com/3008595.a…
the Winnower retweeted
A picture speaks a thousand words in new scientific journal (extension of the blog @sketchscience) -- my latest for @ChemistryWorld: chemistryworld.com/news/a-pi… @hollybik @authorea @McDawg
the Winnower retweeted
Is anyone else as super-excited by this concept developed by @sketchscience and powered by @authorea? Tackling science misinformation with the use non-technical illustrated articles (cartoons and memes!) to share on social media. #scicomm #misinformation #pseudoscience teapawt.net/sketchscience/status/9…
We are happy to take our next step and introduce a new publication, the Journal of Sketching Science. Designed to mimic elements of conventional science journals while also adopting more innovative science communication approaches. journal.sketchingscience.org…






























