Pinned Tweet
The average American today lives better than John D. Rockefeller did in 1926. That is not an exaggeration. It is a fact.
Rockefeller could not fly across the country in five hours. You can for $200. He could not video call his family from another continent. You do it for free. He had no antibiotics, no MRI, no air conditioning in July. He could not carry every book ever written in his pocket. You are reading this on a device that does all of that and more.
Americans throw away 30-40% of their food. Not because they are wasteful, but because food is so abundant that waste is affordable. Your car has climate control, navigation, and safety systems that did not exist at any price a century ago. Your home has heating, cooling, refrigeration, and entertainment that emperors could not have imagined.
None of this was voted into existence. None of it was redistributed from the rich. It was created by free minds operating in what remains of a free market. Every comfort you enjoy today is the product of a man who thought, invented, produced, and traded voluntarily.
This is what the remnants of capitalism still deliver, even while it is being dismantled. Imagine what a fully free society could build.
It is time for a change. Time for a change from treating rhetoric as a substitute for reality, where "work every day to make this country better" means another round of programs paid for with borrowed money. Time for facts and reason instead of slogans. The facts: $40 trillion in debt, $2 trillion added this year alone, and both parties still promising more. The candidates you're endorsing offer government-run healthcare and bigger spending, which is more of what produced the crisis we find ourselves in and which people like Obama want to ignore in favor of their political religion. You told us this week that your Iran deal kept the peace while the regime hid its weapons archive and enriched toward a bomb. Words don't restrain dictatorships and words don't balance budgets. A real change would be a government that protects rights, spends within its means, and leaves producers free. You and everyone on your ballot is offering the opposite.
It's time for a change.
Vote for leaders like @AbdulElSayed and @JocelynBenson who will work every day to make this country better.
The Rational Animal 🤔 retweeted
Visiting a Concorde always makes me feel equal parts angry and determined.
Angry that we let the future of flight go so wrong and then die. Determined not to let it stay this way.
The Rational Animal 🤔 retweeted
In the last four weeks, I learned that my stepsister has stage 4 cancer, my stepmother has a potentially aggressive brain tumor that can't be completely removed, and today, my mother passed away.
I'm not entirely sure how I feel yet. Mostly shock, I think, and an instinct to keep moving forward.
Life doesn't owe us fairness, and reality doesn't make exceptions for anyone.
But there's still plenty to live for, people to love, things to accomplish, and happiness to pursue.
And I have no intention of losing sight of that.
If anyone believes this nonsense, here are the facts he is counting on you not knowing.
The deal did not end Iran's nuclear program. It rented a pause. Iran kept its centrifuges, kept Fordow buried in a mountain, kept enriching to 3.67%, and the key restrictions came with expiration dates. The sunset clauses began lifting in 2025. Obama's own answer at the time was that breakout time "would have shrunk almost down to zero" as the deal expired. His deal scheduled the problem for his successors.
The regime lied its way into the deal. The JCPOA was premised on Iran coming clean about past weapons work. In 2018 Israel pulled Iran's own nuclear archive out of a Tehran warehouse: tens of thousands of documents on the Amad Project, a crash program to build nuclear weapons, preserved and hidden while Iran certified it had no such program. The IAEA later found uranium traces at undeclared sites Iran never explained.
The deal paid for terror. Sanctions relief unfroze roughly $100 billion and the US delivered $1.7 billion in cash. That money flowed to the IRGC, Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis. Diplomacy with a regime at war with you is financing, not peace.
And the result? By 2025 Iran was enriching to 60%, a short technical step from weapons grade, with enough material for multiple bombs and the IAEA declaring it in violation of its obligations. That is what required military force this year. Iran marched to the threshold under the deal's cover and after it.
"I didn't have to fire a missile" is true. He handed the regime money, legitimacy, and a timetable, and left the missiles to be fired a decade later by someone else. Appeasing a dictatorship doesn't buy peace. It buys the dictatorship time.
Here are the sources for each claim :
Obama's "shrunk almost down to zero" quote (NPR, April 7, 2015):
npr.org/transcripts/43165255…
timesofisrael.com/obama-deal…
Deal terms, 300kg cap, 3.67%, sunset clauses: the JCPOA text itself and the AP reporting in the Times of Israel link above cover the caps. For sunsets beginning to lift in 2025, the ASPI Strategist analysis of Albright and Burkhard's archive book describes the clauses removing nearly all enrichment limitations beginning in 2025.
2018 nuclear archive raid, Amad Project, preservation after 2003:
isis-online.org/isis-reports…
isis-online.org/isis-reports…
isis-online.org/isis-reports…
IAEA uranium traces at undeclared sites and Iran's failure to explain:
isis-online.org/isis-reports…
egyptindependent.com/iran-fa…
IAEA comprehensive non-compliance report of May 31, 2025, and the 408.6 kg stockpile at 60%:
isis-online.org/isis-reports…
The $1.7 billion cash payment and roughly $100 billion unfrozen: the $1.7B settlement, $400M principal plus $1.3B interest, is State Department and Treasury public record from January 2016, reported by AP, WSJ, and Reuters at the time. The $100B figure comes from Treasury Secretary Lew's 2015 congressional testimony, with the administration estimating $50-56B readily usable.
Ro Khanna must have learned arithmetic in the government schools he wants to expand, because he cannot add.
Start with what he leaves out. The federal deficit for fiscal 2026, closed last month, is $2 trillion. Spending of $7.4 trillion against revenue of $5.4 trillion. For every dollar collected, Washington spent $1.37. Interest on the debt runs about $1.1 trillion, more than the entire military. Total debt passed $40 trillion in August.
That is before Medicare for All, free college, free childcare, and trade schools. Medicare for All alone runs around $3 trillion a year. Taxing every billionaire at 5 percent raises about $420 billion. One time. Then the money is gone and the program is permanent.
His France math fails the same way. Social Security is 5 percent of GDP, but he skips Medicare at nearly 4 percent more. Government at every level already spends 39 percent of GDP here. Add his list and we are France, with a deficit that was already the highest in the developed world.
The post-war boom he invokes ran on a federal government spending about 17 percent of GDP and a debt that fell from 106 percent of GDP to 38 by 1965. He proposes the reverse and calls it the same thing.
He graduated Phi Beta Kappa in economics from the University of Chicago. He knows what these numbers mean. He writes this garbage anyway, because he is counting votes, not dollars.
The reason the US surpassed France is we invested in education & research.
In the late 1950s, we had 80 percent of teenagers enrolled in high schoolers compared to France that was still at 20 to 30 percent.
We built out public colleges and community colleges far more than France.
We invested in NSF & DARPA more than France did in research and allowed universities like Stanford to commercialize tech.
France's 57 percent of GDP is largely because of pensions which pay 60 percent of salary and something the US does not have.
Social security is 5% of GDP, compared to Frances's 14% for pensions.
Students in France want more spending on schools rather than simply on retirees & they oppose tax cuts for the wealthy.
France does have a more economical healthcare system (11% GDP) and Americans would get a better deal if we went to Medicare for all. We currently spend nearly 18% and have more denials and worse outcomes.
The bottom line is we can invest in our public schools, free college, trade schools, childcare, and Medicare for All while still having significantly less public spending than France.
We could have more economic growth by supporting our schools, colleges, universities, research, and entrepreneurs.
Productive investment in health and education leads to growth in a technology age that values human capital.
We can pay for this by taxing the billionaires and not wasting money on losing foreign wars.
This does not make us France.
It makes us the America that saw explosive growth and built the middle class post WWII.
.@smerconish and I discuss!
cnn.com/2026/10/24/world/vid…
Agreed, no software should reach into your account and move money without your authorization. That is a job for licensed professionals like Bernie, who have been doing it by statute for 35 years and call it compassion.
The difference is the bank will reverse an unauthorized withdrawal. The IRS will not.
This is insane. We cannot allow AI agents to go into your bank account and act independently without your authorization. But that is what’s happening right now.
Left unchecked, AI could endanger the entire global financial system — including your bank account.
Pause AI NOW!
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Per Axios, detected AI agents access bank accounts with the customer’s permission. This violates most banks’ terms requiring human logins, which is why banks call it “unauthorized.”
Source: Axios (Oct. 22, 2026) — axios.com/2026/10/22/ai-…
The Rational Animal 🤔 retweeted
Heroes don't have to risk their lives for some cause 'greater than themselves'. Heroes, like @AlexEpstein, save lives by questioning anti-human narratives, lobbying against harmful regulations, freeing up productive potential, and defending energy freedom. Who is your hero?
For years, climate hysteria won most every argument.
Now, finally, the craziness has diminished.
In my full interview with @AlexEpstein we cover the shift, and also: why AI matters, Trump’s energy policies, ESG, and more:
Human Flourishing: AI and Fossil Fuels
The American dream belongs to Wall Street, said no one ever.
The American Dream doesn’t belong to Wall Street. It belongs to the American people.
Thanks to President Trump and Scott Bessent, families don’t have to worry about getting out-bid on their dream homes by private equity barons. And we’re making those same big investors give financial support to families buying their first homes.
home.treasury.gov/news/press…
This is another example of why @brithume is my favorite news anchor. The administration's envoy calls Putin a humanitarian, and Hume calls him what he is, a war criminal, on Fox's own air. No other host there will challenge Trump like that.
DIPLOMATIC FLATTERY DEBATED: "Witkoff is a famously very genial guy and nice guy. What Trump has said about him everybody likes him. Maybe now Vladimir Putin likes him too for saying something pretty extravagant there that he is a humanitarian. The guy is a war criminal for God’s sake and rains down bombs on civilians without regard to human life. To call him a humanitarian is absurd... When you are trying to get a guy who has been locked up for four years illegally, you don’t insult the guy. Maybe you flatter him. Maybe this time he flattered him a little too much." @brithume
The Rational Animal 🤔 retweeted
DIPLOMATIC FLATTERY DEBATED: "Witkoff is a famously very genial guy and nice guy. What Trump has said about him everybody likes him. Maybe now Vladimir Putin likes him too for saying something pretty extravagant there that he is a humanitarian. The guy is a war criminal for God’s sake and rains down bombs on civilians without regard to human life. To call him a humanitarian is absurd... When you are trying to get a guy who has been locked up for four years illegally, you don’t insult the guy. Maybe you flatter him. Maybe this time he flattered him a little too much." @brithume
What he means is that only men like himself via government force should be able to do any of these.
AI is a tool. It fires nobody and denies nobody. A decision maker does those things, and the only question is who that decision maker is and whether you can walk away from him. An insurer that denies your claim can be fired, sued, or left for a competitor. Under his Medicare for All, the government is the only payer allowed by law. When it denies your care, there is no second door, no appeal to a rival, no exit. He is not proposing to protect you from a denial. He is proposing to decide who issues it, and his answer is the one institution you can never leave.
The tool does not worry him. Your independence from him does.
Faith is the one commodity Washington holds in surplus. Congress takes it on faith that a $40 trillion debt pays itself. You take it on faith that the debt has nothing to do with federal health programs, the largest item in the budget at $1.8 trillion a year. You take it on faith that Medicare for All needs no price tag, that a billion dollars sits idle in a vault, and that a 7 percent annual tax on capital leaves the capital standing.
Faith is belief without evidence. Reason is the faculty that identifies the facts and accepts them whether they flatter your platform or not. The trustees publish the facts every June. The Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund runs short in 2033 and the law cuts payments 11 percent automatically. The Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund runs short in 2032 and the law cuts benefits 22 percent automatically. Prayer does not move either date.
Washington has all the faith it can hold. What it lacks is reason, and you are campaigning to bring more of the first.
"I want to see people not die" is the argument of every appeaser in history, and it deserves the answer history gave it.
World War II killed roughly 70 to 85 million people. Over 400,000 of them were Americans. By Hannity's logic, the moral course in 1941 would have been surrender. Let Hitler keep Europe. Let Japan keep the Pacific. People would stop dying. The war should have been settled long ago.
The American Revolution killed roughly 25,000 Americans. About 6,800 fell in battle. Out of a population of 2.5 million, that is one percent of the country, the equivalent of over 3 million Americans today. By Hannity's logic, Washington should have settled long ago. The colonists were outgunned, outspent, and losing men they could not replace. Accept the Crown's terms, stop the dying, take the deal. Had they followed that advice, there is no United States. There is no Constitution. There is no free nation for Hannity to broadcast from. Every liberty he exercises tonight exists because men at Valley Forge rejected the argument he is making.
Observe what this argument demands and of whom. It asks nothing of the aggressor. Russia can end every death tomorrow by going home. Instead the demand lands on the victim. Stop defending yourself, your resistance is the problem. That is not a plea for peace. That is a plea for the aggressor's victory delivered in humanitarian language.
A man who counts corpses without asking who initiated the killing has dropped the one fact that gives the count moral meaning. 32,000 soldiers lost in a month is Putin's doing. He started this war. He continues it. He can stop it at any hour he chooses. Blaming Ukraine for those deaths is like blaming the man who fights fires for the smoke.
If "people not dying" is the standard, there is only one way to stop it. Make aggression fatal to the aggressor.
This kind of intellectual corruption is the reason that Hannity's own network puts Trump's approval at 36%, with 64% disapproving and why Trump is about to hand the country back to the Democrats.
The Rational Animal 🤔 retweeted
Trump’s executive order waving sanctions on Russia is a present to Vladimir Putin.
Anyone who believes this is even possible has lost his grip on reality or learned math from Bernie, AOC or Ro Khanna. Run the numbers.
$1,000 a week from one company = $52,000 a year per person
Times 3 to 5 companies = $156,000 to $260,000 a year per person
Times 262 million American adults = $41 to $68 trillion a year
US GDP is about $31 trillion. All federal revenue is about $5.5 trillion. Total after-tax profit of every corporation in America is under $4 trillion. One week of checks from one company, $262 billion, is around ten times OpenAI's annual revenue. The plan requires a handful of firms to pay out more than every dollar produced in the country, every year, forever.
That's the simple math problem. The deeper one is that money isn't wealth. A check is a claim on goods somebody produced. If nobody works, the check buys whatever the machines make, and prices rise until the checks are worth exactly what backs them, which is nothing. Printing claims on production that doesn't exist is how you get Weimar, not leisure.
Walsh is right that it's a dystopia. He's wrong about who'd be writing the checks. No company can. Only a government with a printing press would try.
This sounds like a dystopian nightmare. I do not want to live off of handouts from my Big Tech overlords. The fact that anyone sees this as some heavenly vision of the future is extremely depressing. Some people (most?) just simply do not want freedom or autonomy. They do not have ambition of any kind. For ambitious, independent minded people, this fact is very hard to absorb.
I don’t see it ending well. 40 trillion in debt. 2 trillion in yearly deficits. A Republican administration taking partial ownership of the means of production. The expansion of the welfare state by both parties and the refusal to address this crisis decade after decade.
Replying to @theobjectivist
We're living Atlas Shrugged and it doesn't end well if we keep going down that road...
LASIK eye surgery costs roughly $2,100 per eye today. In 1998, it cost $2,200 per eye. Adjusted for inflation, you are paying about 60% less for a procedure that has simultaneously become faster, safer, and more precise. That is what markets do when left alone.
Now compare that to a hearing aid. The FDA classified hearing aids as prescription medical devices for decades, locking you into audiologist appointments before you could buy a $3,000 device that a manufacturer could produce for $300. Or, look at insulin. Heavily regulated, patent-extended, and politically manipulated, a vial of Humalog ran over $330 in 2024 versus roughly $21 in Canada for a biosimilar. Same molecule. Different regulatory environment.
LASIK sits in a peculiar gap. Insurers rarely cover it, which means third-party payment schemes never severed the price signal between provider and patient. You shop, clinics compete, manufacturers race to improve technology. The feedback loop that markets depend on functions exactly as it should.
Regulated medical markets break that loop deliberately. The FDA's approval process costs pharmaceutical companies over $2.6 billion per new drug on average, erecting barriers that protect incumbents and punish smaller competitors who cannot absorb a decade of compliance costs. Patients then pay the premium on the back end.
LASIK is the control in the experiment. The market won.
This is what happens when men like Ro Khanna promise a generation of young people that everything will be free, and then reality catches up. The looters' money runs dry, there is nothing left to confiscate, and the youth demand more, exactly as they were taught. Khanna is condoning their actions right now. Khanna is a despicable morally corrupt man who is now trying to cash in on this tragedy to push his twisted political agenda.
Look at what he is praising. In France, 24 schools burned or ransacked, 6,100 arrests, hundreds injured, headteachers attacked. In Tirana, students set fires and stormed the Education Ministry. Even France's prime minister said burning down a high school does not improve it. Khanna calls it young people telling their governments they want a future.
And notice the schools. France spends more public money on education than almost any nation on earth, and the buildings are still crumbling. The welfare state did not fail these students for lack of funding. It failed because it was the welfare state.
He blames wealth in the hands of a few. The few did not torch the schools. The students did, after a lifetime of hearing their needs were a claim on everyone else.
"America's Next New Deal" is the same promise. Khanna wants the French result here.
From the high schools of France to the streets of Madrid to the universities of Tirana, young people are telling their governments the same thing: in an age of massive wealth inequality, they want a future they can believe in.
In France, students and teachers are asking for safe schools, enough teachers and smaller classes.
In Spain, for affordable rent and housing.
In Albania, for good jobs and an end to corruption.
@JDVance says this is what happens when a nation lets in too many immigrants from the global south.
He is not just morally wrong, but misreading the moment.
The is what happens when nations let wealth and power accumulate in the hands of a few.
This is what happens when young people lose hope in their future.
In America, let us listen to our young.
We need an economic and political transformation.
America's Next New Deal.





















