'Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity' -- McLuhan. Mostly tweets about the Skripal incident. Mostly.

Brighton & Hove, England
Joined March 2010
Replying to @funder
"The enemy is a perfect model of malice, a kind of amoral supermanβ€”sinister, ubiquitous, powerful, cruel, sensual, luxury-loving. He wills and manufactures the mechanism of history, or tries to deflect the course of history in an evil way." harpers.org/archive/1964/11/…
28
42
9
186
It doesn't matter what your views on Israel are: we can't allow people to take land because their "god tells them" it's theirs. Not Jews, not Christians, not Muslims. This may have been the way eg modern America was created, but no-one should accept this from anyone in the C21st.
Typical Israeli young voter who's obviously indigenous to the land discusses the situation outside a rally for Itamar Ben Gvir Ben Gvir's "Jewish Power" party will gain seats in Tuesday's election thanks to youth voters
1
6
25
417
From a time when some politicians had actual principles. There's one thing I can say without doubt: if David Aaronovitch is pouring scorn on those who have questions about the death of Robin Cook, then there are definitely real questions to be asked about the death of Robin Cook.
ROBIN COOK: DEAD MAN, SEALED FILE Robin Cook quit the government over a war he said was built on a lie. 2 years later he was dead on a Scottish hillside, and the case was shut before anyone finished their tea. In March 2003 Robin Cook stood up in the House of Commons @HouseofCommons and resigned as Leader of the House rather than back the Iraq War. MPs from every party gave him a standing ovation. That had never happened in that chamber before, and it has not happened since. For the next two years Robin Cook told anyone who would listen that Tony Blair had walked Britain into a war built on nothing. History eventually agreed with him. It did not save him. On 6 August 2005 Robin Cook was hillwalking with his wife Gaynor Cook on Ben Stack, a mountain in Sutherland. He collapsed with a heart attack, fell around 8 feet down a ridge, and was airlifted to Raigmore Hospital in Inverness. He was pronounced dead minutes after arriving. Days later a post mortem gave the cause as hypertensive heart disease. The Northern Constabulary treated it as a routine medical death and left it there. No inquest reopening. No criminal inquiry. A former Foreign Secretary who had spent two years humiliating the government over an illegal war dropped dead on one of the most remote hillsides in the country, and the file closed almost as fast as it opened. Here is the detail that rarely makes the story. Ben Stack sits inside the Reay Forest Estate, owned by the Grosvenor family. At the time Robin Cook died on that hill, Gerald Grosvenor, the 6th Duke of Westminster, was serving as assistant chief of the defence staff at the Ministry of Defence. Robin Cook died on land connected to a senior Ministry of Defence figure, two years after resigning over that same ministry's war. Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat MP who later became a Home Office minister and spent years investigating the death of weapons inspector David Kelly, said in 2007 that Robin Cook had been on Ministry of Defence linked land when he died and that he had real doubts about the official account. Columnist David Aaronovitch (@DAaronovitch) called him a conspiracy theorist for saying it. That label has a habit of landing on the people asking questions, never on the people refusing to answer them. Then there is the part almost nobody covers. From 2020 onward, requests were filed with Police Scotland (@PoliceScotland) under Freedom of Information law for the basic facts of that day. What time officers were alerted. Whether witnesses were interviewed. Whether the hillwalker who helped Gaynor Cook down the mountain was ever identified. Police Scotland refused, arguing the requests repeated an earlier one. The Scottish Information Commissioner (@FOIScotland) told them that reasoning did not hold up. So Police Scotland switched tactics and refused the actual content instead, citing legal exemptions. The Commissioner upheld that refusal in Decision 074/2021 and again in Decision 011/2022. 20 years on, the basic facts of how a former Foreign Secretary died on a Scottish hillside remain sealed. Nobody had to cover anything up. They just had to outlast the people asking. SOURCES @HeraldScotland @thetimes @FOIScotland @PoliceScotland @BBC
14
114
4
308
7,644
No-one in the Parliamentary Labour Party is a true "friend of Britain". Their loyalties lie elsewhere or, in just one or two cases, they are deceiving themselves. So it follows that no MP in "Labour Friends of Israel" is a true friend of Britain. The same applies the Tories, ofc.
Would be nice to have a Labour Friends of Britain.
7
29
109
2,689
Moving on... 🀣 In point of fact the solicitor to the Dawn Sturgess inquiry was not only the solicitor to the Hutton inquiry into the death of David Kelly, but also served in that role in the 7/7 Inquiry, the Diana crash inquiry, and the UK COVID inquiry. xitter.cf/timtron2020/status/143…
The inquiry was a cover-up, like the Hutton inquiry into the death of Dr David Kelly was (it even used the same solicitor). It didn't even speak to the sole witness to Dawn's death, an alcoholic addict whose previous girlfriend had also died in his presence two years previously.
13
104
4
225
3,967
Other witnesses the inquiry did not speak to included Alison McCourt, the Chief Nurse of the British Army, who with her daughter was a first responder to the #Skripals. She was excused partly due to mental trauma she had apparently suffered as a result of conspiracy theories. 5/6
5
12
82
1,087
Dawn's death is now used as a reason why we must view Russia as an enemy. But the inquiry did not speak to the alleged targets of the initial attack, the person who allegedly gave Dawn the poison and witnessed her collapse, or the person who hours later saw him also collapse. 6/6
3
26
119
1,114
A similar thread from the time: xitter.cf/timtron2020/status/185…
EIGHT PEOPLE WHO SHOULD TESTIFY BEFORE THE DAWN STURGESS INQUIRY (but probably won't): The #DawnSturgess inquiry has heard from some very interesting witnesses, particularly Dr Stephen Cockroft. But here are eight witnesses who I think should testify -- and probably won't. 1/8
2
8
52
858
It also didn't speak to Charlie Rowley, Dawn's partner: the sole witness to her death, as well as the person who supposedly found the novichok bottle that killed her. An alcoholic addict, his poor memory and state of health apparently meant he could not give spoken testimony. 3/6
2
11
86
1,086
The inquiry also failed to speak to Sam Hobson, Rowley's drug buddy and the person who witnessed Rowley's collapse at his flat, hours after he had supposedly spilled #novichok all over his hands. When he recovered, Rowley initially believed it was Hobson who had poisoned him. 4/6
2
10
76
1,021
Most obviously, it didn't call the #Skripals. The chair of the inquiry ruled that it would be far too dangerous for Sergei and Yulia to appear before the inquiry in person, even via secure video link during the inquiry's secret sessions. They might get not-assassinated again. 2/6
3
16
104
1,240
DAWN STURGESS INQUIRY: THE WITNESSES WHO DIDN'T APPEAR It's two years since the inquiry into the death of Dawn Sturgess, allegedly killed by novichok four months after the Skripal Salisbury events of 2018, began public hearings. The witnesses it *didn't* speak to are notable. 1/6
14
169
10
303
7,313
The dubious Jim Chimirie account is able to recognise that the government lied about WMDs in order to manufacture consent for war in the case of Iraq. But in the case of Salisbury and novichok, Jim mysteriously finds the establishment to be the unquestionable source of all truth.
Replying to @childofthewarp
Yes, Novichok. The nerve agent used in Salisbury in 2018 that killed an innocent British woman, Dawn Sturgess. The public inquiry concluded that Putin authorised the operation. A British woman died on British soil. What exactly do you find funny?
11
21
2
123
1,471
Political leaders should only be respected if/when they are humble. This is because they are supposed to serve the people who elected them rather than themselves. So which of these past leaders was the most humble and respectful of the people who voted for them, in your opinion?
3%Keir Starmer
2%Boris Johnson
40%Liz Truss
55%Gordon Brown
204 votes β€’ Final results
40
8
4
22
1,909
Russia is -- very substantially -- part of Europe. The fact that the EU refuses to recognise this obvious geographical/geopolitical fact is what makes the EU so pathetic. Its "leaders" presume to speak for Europe when they barely have responsibility for themselves as individuals.
'No lasting peace in Ukraine without Europe' Merz feeling like the schlub who doesn't get invited to parties 'We must have a seat at the table'
7
23
115
1,442
"Russia launched a chemical attack on this country" The #Skripal #Salisbury #novichok narrative remains central to the establishment's demand we continue to fund wars and pay the price of conflict worldwide, eight-and-a-half years later. The smug face of Iain Dale says it all.
Iain Dale completely loses it after a caller refuses to go along with the approved narrative on Russia. The caller says most people simply don’t care about Russia, don’t see it as a threat, and just want lower energy bills. β€œOn the street, nobody agrees with your talking points.” Dale asks: β€œYou don’t think Russia is a threat to this country?” β€œNo. It’s not”, the caller replies. β€œThe average person just wants their bills to come down.” Dale then explodes: β€œYeah but they don’t want bills to come down by appeasing a brutal Russian dictator who’s invaded the sovereign country of Ukraine and killed hundreds of thousands of people! What part of that do you not get!?” The caller hits back: β€œWhat are you talking about? As if we’re some kind of beacon of humanity. Give me a break!” You can shout at people all you like, Iain, but it doesn’t make you right. Plenty of people don’t support the Ukraine war, don’t believe Russia is an existential threat to Britain, and know there’s more to this than Putin just waking up one day and deciding to invade for fun. They don’t buy the β€œHitler” comparison and would happily buy cheaper oil if it meant improving the shocking living standards created by years of reckless government policy. As the caller points out, we’re hardly saints either, not with the regimes we back and the things Britain has done itself. Most people have seen through the nonsense.
31
59
5
245
4,777
We must never forget the US slaughter of schoolgirls in Minab, Iran on 28 Feb 2026. It wasn’t an "intelligence error". It wasn't a mistake. It was an attack designed to kill girls. When you kill girls you destroy the potential of future generations to exist. That was the intent.
6
51
1
169
1,516
An out gay man in Saudi Arabia would be imprisoned and/or subjected to public flogging -- and that's if they are lucky, Wes. But please, tell us more about how Saudi Arabia is your ally.
The Houthi attacks on our ally Saudi Arabia are absolutely despicable and dangerous for the region. Today I have approved further UK military support. RAF Typhoons will fly defensive air missions to protect Saudi airspace from drones and missiles. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¦
20
58
1
190
2,305
Twiki πŸ‰ 🚜 πŸ™ retweeted
Russophobia: the ignorant colonial racism that is not only permissible for liberals, but also virtuous.
The β€œpodunk country” in the question
3
7
61
856
I've said it before: the DEFINING characteristic of an entire industrial complex of war-dependent commentators, journalists, historians, politicians and academics -- of whom Anne Applebaum is a prime example -- is their claim to understand Putin's psychology, or "what he wants".
59
101
10
435
10,058
There is perhaps nothing more human than admitting you've made a mistake. We all make mistakes. However, admitting to them is another level of responsibility: it's very uncomfortable. We never see this concession from governments, which take "personal" responsibility for nothing.
4
17
75
917