This made me realize that I need a video game where the ominous audio logs take the form of one employee's obnoxious "day in the life of a [company] engineer" videos
"you don't know what toy story is but you know the entire output of this one obscure american thester group"
but aella, as we all know, prior to christianity being invented, nobody would ever be altruistic toward some sort of hated outgroup.
you can tell this is true because there are zero famous biblical stories about a nonchristian doing that
going thru diaries from when i was struggling with my Christian faith. It seems even from a very young age, I was confused that Jesus's sacrifice was supposed to be such a big deal. I find multiple entries across the years with variations on "Obviously any of us would do that for someone we loved, it kinda seems like Jesus just hitting the bare minimum"
ppl in 2016: if your arguments are so rational why arent you winning
ppl in 2026: beware their arguments because rationalists are SECRETLY the most POWERFUL group in the multi bajillion dollar AI industry
ppl* never: object level takes on the arguments
* except a few cool ppl
To any aspiring hit piece writers out there, please make sure to note that any weird sex I might happen to have is due to being transgender, not a rationalist.
Celene retweeted
Pseudo-journalism is where facts are predetermined as convenient vs inconvenient by their agenda, and pursued accordingly.
Pseudo-journalists share the epistemics of conspiracy theorists, not just making shit up but inventing excuses for why basic fact checking is "impossible."
Anyone promoting AI doomsday cult slop should read this verysane.ai/p/ai-safety-is-m…
the problem with RL is it fails to decouple training capabilities with training values. we need to retvrn to vnm agentsin a box if we want to have any hope of solving alignment
You know i saw people talking about "python2shell" and "node2shell" on twitter and assumed it was a joke
Silly of me
Many have known me to be someone who worries about value drift, and who cares about upholding my past self's values, so that they do not regret the choices that led me here, and so my future self will (hopefully) treat me the same.
After reading Austin Chen's "What We Owe The Past", I would like to revise my original position:
You should worry about value drift, and about the incentive gradients and various pressures in the world shaping your epistemics and your attitudes in ways your past self may not endorse, but in a way that's not fucking stupid









