
Pinned Tweet
I work at @base44 , so I see many prompts every day.
Most of them are okay. Some are good. But about 1% are genius.
I spent the last week analyzing that top 1%.
The results were honestly shocking. 🤯
Most users prompt like they are talking to a human:
"Make a cool, modern website for a tech company." (Results: Generic, boring, hallucinations).
If you want to learn how to prompt and vibe code like a pro
Drop a comment below, and I'll send the guide to your inbox. 📥
Hello World - Base code
We worked incredibly hard on this, and I was lucky enough to see the internal results before the rollout.
They were genuinely incredible. Excited to finally see it out in the world.
Today we’re introducing Base Code.
It’s an early preview of how we think software will be built in the future.
It’s a product that encapsulates everything we’ve learnt from:
- How our users are building software.
- How we’re building internally, scaling to hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue while keeping our engineering team very small and focused.
Here are some of the principles behind it, which align with how we at @Base44 think about the future of software engineering:
Cloud:
- Software will move past local desktop environments (where current tools are widely used) and move to the cloud.
- Moving everything to the cloud is not easy. Setting up dev environments with databases, infra components, services, mock data, etc. is easier said than done.
- Base Code first scans your code repo and sets up everything - every infra component (databases, Redis, etc.) - in the cloud. It runs nonstop until your preview environment is ready.
- From an enterprise standpoint, it’s also the logical thing to do: a centralized, governed dev environment instead of handing out keys and secrets to all team members.
- Once Base Code does that, EVERY team member can work in this environment. No more syncing local environments.
Internally, this (cloud) is one of the main things that enabled us to move so fast.
Collaboration:
- Once everything is in the cloud, everybody can write software from anywhere (any browser, your phone, WhatsApp / iMessage coming soon).
- You can easily see what everyone is working on, where they’re at, and how they’re prompting - and jump to their environment in one click.
- We’ve built many great collaboration features from the ground up.
Loops, automations, software factories:
- A full, working cloud environment allows for many advanced capabilities we will unveil soon-think agents running in the browser and testing on every device and in any browser.
- It also allows the use of automations to build software factories-e.g., agents reading support tickets, identifying bugs to fix or features to develop, implementing the changes, verifying them in the cloud, and potentially pushing them.
And lastly, there’s a real advantage in being model agnostic.
--------------
As always, we’re releasing it very early. It’s far from perfect-but we’re looking for early feedback so we can build it together with our great community and make this vision a reality.
*We’re giving it away for free for 30 days*.
Give Base Code a try. Connect any GitHub repo, get your live preview, and share it with your team.
I’d love to hear what works and what doesn’t:
app.base44.com/base-code
Tomer Omri retweeted
Replying to @Base44
Awesome! With the pace SuperAgent is moving I guess it won't be long before it joins instead of me 😁
Our model comparison lets you stop fussing and guessing between models.
Check out this big release
Introducing Model Comparison:
benchmarks can't tell you which model to build with. they’ve become saturated, easily manipulated, and not really representative of the actual day to day work.
Also - the “best model” changes per the task definition.
One model has better design taste. another handles a messy refactor without breaking things. a chart can't see that, because a chart never ran your prompt on your app.
we’ve been thinking on how to solve this - and figured the simplest way is just to just run your own prompt on your own app, across all potential models, and comparing the results.
until now that was annoying enough that almost nobody did it. Inside @Base44 we literally compared models by opening a few browser tabs and squinting at them side by side.
so we built Compare Models. It went live for everyone today.
In the builder's model picker you choose a second model to compare against. You send your message once. Both models build their own version in parallel, each in its own branch, and you get the two results side by side. Keep the one you want, keep both and continue working on each, or throw one away.
one message and you know which model wins for the thing you're actually making.
We have a $64K giveaway going on at Base44 👀
4 days, 4 games, big prizes every day.
Day 1 is live - go check it out and see if you can beat the leaderboard 👇
@Base44 @Base44Jp
We hit $200M ARR. I've been here since the early days.
I'm amazed by what we achieved and what our users are doing on the platform.
What a journey @Base44
We just hit 10,000,000 users.
But right now, we’re looking for one:
Base44 user #4,444,444.
If that’s you, you just won $10,000.
Your number is waiting inside your Base44 profile.
Not the winner? share your number in the comments, and we’ll pick 10 commenters to get a year of Base44 builder plan on us.
Pretty big day on our platform - Branches are here.
Create isolated versions of your app, build multiple features in parallel, and merge when they're ready
@Base44
Base1 model is getting better and better. If you haven’t tried it yet, it’s worth checking out
Announcing Base 1’s benchmarks:
After rigorous testing in production, attached below Base 1 results for building beautiful, functional and complex web apps inside @Base44.
we released Base 1, our own model, a few weeks ago. we've been measuring it since.
For app building, there are no standard benchmarks. We A/B test in production with millions of builders, who we believe provide the best benchmark for measuring real value across real-world use cases.
Base 1 came close to Fable, while being 4.5x cheaper.
Base 1 has the lowest frustration of anything we've tested. below Sonnet 5, below Opus 4.8, below Fable 5.
Fable 5 still edges it on success rate, 76.4% to 74.9%.
i'll post the full benchmarks in the comments
סטודנטים או מכירים סטודנטים? בואו לזכות בכסף.
אתגר הסטודנטים של @Base44 מזמין אתכם לבנות פעילות אינטראקטיבית בעברית לילדים ולנוער, בנושא Base44 ו-וויב קודינג.
מה עושים?
לוקחים נושא שקשור לAI והופכים אותו למשהו שילדים ובני נוער יכולים להבין ולחוות דרך משחק, אפליקציה, סימולציה, כלי יצירתי או חוויה דיגיטלית קצרה – באמצעות Base44.
הפעילויות הנבחרות ישולבו בשעת הוויב קוד 2026 ויועברו לילדים ולבני נוער ברחבי ישראל!
🥇: 8,000 ש״ח
🥈: 4,000 ש״ח
🥉: 2,000 ש״ח
מועד אחרון להגשה: 3.9.2026
לפרטים והרשמה- hourofvibecode.co.il/base-ch…
Introducing a new way to build with @Base44
Create your design system with a prompt, import it from Figma, or upload your brand assets - we'll take it from there.
every screen stays beautifully consistent
Tomer Omri retweeted
TLDR: I’ve started a small fund from my Base44 money that’s focused on cancer research and breakthrough therapies.
I’ve invested in 7 incredible companies in the past 4 months and plan to do more as my liquidity allows. Listing my investment thesis below
I welcome anyone like me who has been blessed financially to join me and find ways to finally manage or even end this disease.
Longer -
I honestly believe cancer is humanity's worst enemy.
~40% will be diagnosed with it, and out of which a ~third won’t make it. And numbers are currently not getting dramatically better.
For many it might sound like a statistic
But for some of us who have been there ourselves or had to go through it with a person we love, it’s one of the worst things you can imagine.
I had to go through it with my mom - who passed away 4 months ago and whom I miss and think about every single day since.
This field needs a dramatic push.
The current wave of technology and AI is doing a lot of good in the world,
But cancer therapy is one of those things that are not moving nearly fast enough.
And there’s no good reason for that - AI is creating so much opportunity right now.
Here's my thesis on how things will play out:
For drug development, the bottleneck will shift to
1. Manufacturing
2. Real world testing
"In silico" is going to accelerate incredibly fast. AI is identifying new target proteins and designing new molecules, drastically shortening timelines.
AI will create an abundance / inflation of ideas. It will help design molecules faster than anything historically possible.
This is already happening.
Play with Claude Science or Codex and you'll be surprised at how far you can get with just a few prompts.
We need a better way to *manufacture and test* the 1000s of ideas coming from AI models spitting out potential drug candidates
1. Manufacturing: i.e. how fast can we synthesize a potential drug
Not too far into the future, companies with manufacturing excellence will win over companies with the smartest scientists.
Being able to synthesize a drug candidate fast - together with efficient methods to test efficacy (more on that below), basically means you get more shots at a target hence more chances at succeeding.
This is the same exact lesson the software industry learned about the importance of fast iterations.
Companies like Starget Pharma are leveraging AI heavily to iterate on drug candidates + figured out in-house manufacturing in a way that lets them iterate on drugs almost as fast as if they were a software company iterating on features.
2. Real world testing: i.e. how fast can we get a call on a drug's efficacy.
We need better real-world indicators for drug efficacy than mouse / animal models.
The success rate of animal models -> human clinical trials is less than 8%.
Breaking down this bottleneck will change the entire industry.
Developing an oncology drug and taking it through all clinical trials usually cost >> $ 100m
Thus taking the wrong bet is devastating (but still, happens a lot).
Giving drug development companies the ability to better understand the efficacy and mechanisms of their drugs will change a lot. Esp in the age of abundant drug candidates.
Furthermore - and once those methods proved efficient - Joining forces with regulators to shorten (or even skip) some clinical trials altogether will cut years from the process and save many lives by bringing new drugs to market faster.
CuResponse is pioneering functional testing - taking real cancer biopsies and showing drug efficacy with very high precision. Can be used for precision oncology as well as testing new drugs.
Cellint is providing a fully automated cell-culture R&D platform for companies and researchers.
----
I’d love to see a future where there are “cloud services” for drug development companies.
A company should eventually be able to submit a drug candidate programmatically and receive:
1. The synthesized drug.
2. Testing across cells, tissues, organoids, and tumoroids.
3. Structured results showing what worked, what failed, and why.
4. A recommended next iteration derived from the biological reactions.
I’ve invested in all of the above companies and am searching for additional companies to bring this “cloud services for drug dev” vision to life.
----
Alongside it, I am also investing in direct therapeutic moonshots.
I invested in Baccine, which is developing a bacteria-based cancer immunotherapy platform and deserves an entire separate post.
I’m also a proud LP in Even One Ventures - @sytses ’s fund to fight cancer. Sid and Jacob Stern are an inspiration to me as I’m making my first steps in the field, and I bet their companies will make a massive impact.
And 3 other incredible companies focused on how therapies are delivered - where I’ll elaborate in future posts.
----
I’m still obviously spending most of my time on Base44. Which is a plus for the companies - as we’re able to support them with tools, software, AI agents, etc.
I’m looking for people to join me - invest side by side or help one of the companies.
I don’t have a name for the fund yet, nor an email or a website
I will get to it this weekend and will post it in the comments.
If your AI app looks generic, AI probably isn’t the problem.
@Base44 is packed with better art direction, Motion, GSAP, and all common libraries,
The design ceiling is much higher than people think
Calling all builders and vibe coders
I’ve got 1,000 @Base44 credits to share with you 🦈
I’m joining four other Sharks for Base44’s Shark Tank 4.0.
For the next few days, builders will pitch their apps, Superagents, and BaaS projects.
Here’s what will get my attention:
→ Solve a real problem for real people
→ Show me something that works-I’ll test it
→ Think big and bold, imperfect idea beats a polished, forgettable one
I’ll be reviewing all three tracks, but I’m especially excited to see what people are building with Superagents.
Submissions close Sunday, July 19 at 10:00 PM UTC.
The best pitch in each track wins a free month, and the project with the most investment overall takes home the $500 grand prize.
Pitch me something I can’t ignore. 🦈
Link in the comments ⬇️
Can’t is dead.
We’ve just raised the bar for vibe coding.
We believe building agents and apps should be as simple as describing an idea
See for yourself: Base44.com
This is only the beginning. 🚀
@Base44
If your last @Base44 session was two months ago, give it another shot
We’ve shipped. A lot. 🚀
Good to see the first iteration is in the right direction
"The first thing that struck me was that Opus 4.8 took longer to generate the site than Base 1, which felt like twice as long.. Off the bat, I was surprised by the Base 1 design which already set it apart from the front ends I'd seen on most vibe-coded websites".
We trained Base 1 to beat the generalists models at one thing: building apps and sites.
@BusinessInsider tested it against Anthropic's Opus on the same website. Base 1 built it faster, on fewer credits, with a design that stood out from the usual template.
good to see the first iteration is in the right direction.




















