Replying to @Karol1669024
Moi dziadkowie w latach 60 dostali przydział mieszkania. Mieli po 30 lat, ale już wtedy zamienili mieszkanie na parter. Wiedzieli co robią
Replying to @WeiherHenryk @Karol1669024
Rondo się chyba nie sprawdza, gdy natężenie ruchu jest mocno niesymetryczne
Replying to @kamipow @Karol1669024
Ja uważam, że to dobre zjawisko. Prawda, place zabaw są pewnego rodzaju wysypiskiem, ale to daje zabawkom drugie życie. Zamiast wywalać do śmietnika, idą do wspólnej puli. A wyrzucone są dopiero, gdy już całkiem się zniszczą
.@Tajchert czy to prawda, że Kanarek już nie jest rozwijany?
Replying to @PaweMrozek1
Replying to @justinfagnani
So it's back to <iron-ajax>?
I thought that was a bad idea?
Tomasz Pluskiewicz retweeted
The fact that so many web devs have rejected encapsulation, but then have to invent and use so many proprietary abstractions to make up for it still baffles me.
Web components devs have so many things so easy that it's actually disorienting to see how framework devs do things.
Replying to @linkedktk
@Kolchinmax a potential feature for the RDF plugin? 🙏 IntelliJ has been doing the same with JS code recently
.@CastoramaPolska to normalne, że wasi kierowcy tak parkują?
Replying to @heavysaudio @Forbes
I feel you. Mine appears about a week away. Having received the preparation notice on August 8th
They are coming eventually, fwiw
Replying to @heavysaudio @Forbes
Not necessarily. Kickstarter backer here. Many backers never got the shipping notice. I waited a month and then asked for tracking number directly
Wtf @Glassdoor?
You keep sending me some BS emails even though I unsubscribed from all communication in my account
Replying to @llblumire @fasterthanlime
Sadly, I expect Marxism at every corner these days. Interesting times ahead. I the ominous, Chinese proverb sense
Replying to @linkedktk
What's that about?
"Silicon Valley libertarian" sounds like an oxymoron 😉
Replying to @wheretakengame
@wheretakengame you labeled the photo wrong today. That is not the tower you were looking for
Replying to @rob_van_dort
I must disagree on this. RDF can be great tool for transactional data processing
What is the alternative? Modeling software as we currently do and converting to graph?
That is just useless effort and constant model mismatch between.
Reduces RDF to being a data warehouse solution
The assumption that RDF is better just because it is flexible is dangerous and hoping that RDF-Star will be the solution is just naive.
Adding a new piece to an already flawed model will only makes things worse.
But that is not the problem of RDF nor RDF-Star
That is a really nice post by @WorkingOntology.
I so often say that RDF community must seek modeling inspiration in #DDD or #CQRS. The wrong graph is as bad as inadequate relational or object model
You data (and code) must represent the domain accurately...
“I actually do think that RDF-Star is pretty cool, and is going to make a big difference in the RDF world. I just don’t want to see it misused, as a band-aid to cover up poor modeling practice.” — Dean Allemang link.medium.com/3v1qME0pJxb





