
I write about Agentic Economy, previously @vmware.
San Francisco, CA
Joined September 2023
- Tweets2.9K
- Following948
- Followers461
- Likes2.9K
Vivek Kotecha retweeted
Here's what you need to know from the Anthropic S-1:
Anthropic has filed an S-1 registration statement with the SEC related to its proposed IPO.
Read more: anthropic.com/news/s1-sec
Legal disclaimer: A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the SEC but has not yet become effective. These securities may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This post does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction.
Vivek Kotecha retweeted
NASA used to pay $1,000 per line of code to get it formally verified. that's why only rockets, chips and crypto ever bothered
demand for correctness was priced out. that price is about to collapse. the demand is about to explode
Vivek Kotecha retweeted
You can always get a “little” better. Repeat that everyday and one day you won’t recognize yourself .
Vivek Kotecha retweeted
After a great conversation with @hrkrshnn from @cantinaxyz about the agentic cyber arms race, one idea I keep coming back to is that it's turning into a cost war.
Models are now good enough to find most vulnerabilities if you spend enough tokens looking. That puts defenders in a tough spot. If they default to frontier closed models for pen-testing and defense, they burn a lot on expensive tokens. Meanwhile attackers can run swarms of agents on cheap models for as long as it takes.
It's the drones vs aircraft carriers problem in cyber. When cheap drones need expensive missiles to shoot them down, defense eventually becomes unaffordable.
The cyber companies that win will own their data. Every customer audit feeds a pipeline that post-trains their own models on open weights, getting close to frontier performance at a fraction of the cost. Lower cost means they can search longer and defend longer without breaking the bank.
In the age of agents, the advantage goes to whoever can afford to keep looking.
Vivek Kotecha retweeted
Small RL companies are the AI industry's equivalent of quant shops. Let me explain.
Both are small, secretive, full of brilliant people, profitable, and always one step from their edge disappearing.
The parallels:
- Secretive. Nobody publishes their signals. Labs won't say what they're training next, and vendors can't say who they sell to. Epoch calls the market "largely behind closed doors."
- Hunting alpha. For a quant, a trade stops working once everyone finds it. For these shops, a task stops paying once models can solve it (labs drop tasks at around 70% pass rate). Meanwhile, labs are building their own in-house. So they always have to find the next field.
- Deep Industry Connections. You need to know the problem cold to get in. Founders have usually worked at, or sold to, the labs. You can't define "correct" for fund accounting without having done fund accounting.
- They buy strange data. Quants buy satellite photos of parking lots. RL shops bid for enterprise data (eg $12.5M bid for Spirit Airlines historical data).
- Brilliant people. Quants hire math olympiad winners. These shops hire ex-lab researchers and real practitioners.
- Huge revenue per head. Jane Street made about $11M per employee in 2025. Proximal is about $5M. The tweet's company would be $20M.
- One narrow problem that makes something more efficient. Quants make markets more efficient. These RL shops make models training more efficient.
- High risk (for different reasons). A quant can lose millions in a day on a bad trade. An RL shop's risk is that one lab trains a model that makes their environments irrelevant, or brings the work in-house, and the revenue stops.
- Overfitting/reward hacking. A quant's nightmare is a strategy that looks perfect on historical data and fails live. An RL shop's nightmare is an RL grader that scores perfectly and trains the model incorrectly.
- Infrastructure arms race. Quants pay for microseconds of speed. RL shops race to spin up thousands of disposable computers per training run.
Obviously there are as many differences between RL companies and quant shops, but right now the aura around them feels eerily similar.
Curious to see how this market matures as robotics opens up a new surface, and whether the frontier labs end up absorbing them.
Vivek Kotecha retweeted
Some rumors I've heard. I'll start with Google, then Anthropic and OpenAI.
Google: Insiders say Google has either cracked RSI (recursive self-improvement) or is very close. Their pace has picked up fast in recent months. They went from GPT-5 level to Opus 5.5 level in months, and speculation is that RSI made that possible.
Anthropic: About a week ago, Anthropic started a new pretraining run. It is not Fable 5.5 but what would become Fable 6, or something bigger, to catch up to OpenAI's Bel.
OpenAI: Bel (it may have another codename) is the model behind the math results OpenAI published a few days ago, and RSI apparently helped there too.
From what I'm hearing, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google are all very close to cracking RSI or already have. It will get scary and exciting at the same time.
Vivek Kotecha retweeted
JUST IN: Nasdaq CEO predicts blockchain-based tokenization will transform global finance, unleashing tens of billions of dollars in capital.
Unemployment incoming
JUST IN: Anthropic study finds AI & robots together are already capable of performing tasks covering 81% of U.S. employment.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The Anthropic study measures technical exposure of ~80-81% of US job tasks (by working time) to LLMs or robots (mostly limited/structured settings for robots); robots are cost-competitive for only 0.3% of tasks with major barriers.
anthropic.com/research/what-…
Vivek Kotecha retweeted
6 highest forms of intelligence: pattern recognition, delusional optimism, quiet discernment, strategic detachment, deep curiosity, and metacognition.
Vivek Kotecha retweeted
Taylor Swift released her new song "Patient Zero" on September 25th, 2026.
The same day the literal plague supposedly escaped from a lab in Russia.
This was also exactly 6 months, 6 years and 6 days since the first COVID-19 lockdown.
Vivek Kotecha retweeted
Marcus Aurelius wrote this over 1800 years ago:
“Be satisfied with even the smallest progress.”
Vivek Kotecha retweeted
Napoleon's INSANE work ethic:
"I am always at work. I work all the time, at dinner, in the theatre. I wake up at night in order to resume my work. I got up last night at two o’clock. I stretched myself on my couch before the fire to examine the army reports sent to me yesterday evening by the Minister of War. I found twenty mistakes in them, and made notes which I have this morning sent to the minister."
Napoleon was always the most prepared man on the battlefield. He would read shelves of books on the enemy. He would study their army structure, their past battles, their religion. He would buy maps and study the terrain they would fight on. He would also take notecards and write down every possible scenario that would play out. Then he would turn the notecards around and write down how he would respond to each scenario. Going into the battle, he was the most prepared out of anyone in the world.
Key Lesson: Be more prepared than your enemies.



























