Pinned Tweet
I'm calling this Berenson's Law: When you ship a new product or service, major release, or even a major feature, your people resources for new feature development is permanently cut in half. hal2020.com/2018/09/21/the-p…
A most insightful answer to why things slow down
CC:@halberenson
Shipping a product to market is one of the hardest things to do in tech. Go Team @Rapid_API
It's great to see all the different dots connect and form a whole new product after so much hard work. Today we are proud to announce RapidAPI Studio. RapidAPI Studio brings all your API development needs into one place, one suite to rule them all. youtube.com/watch?v=h1PYEJOh…
vgill retweeted
Excited to launch one DevTool for API Developers!
📣 RapidAPI Studio 📣
Superb developer experience of your entire API development lifecycle in one DevTool.
❯ Design & Develop APIs
❯ Test & Monitor APIs
❯ Publish APIs
❯ Monetize APIs
❯ more…
🔗 RapidAPI.com/studio
“We believe the top five distinguishing characteristics of great engineers are writing good code, adjusting behaviors to account for future value and costs, practicing informed decision-making, avoiding making others jobs harder, and learning continuously” - Li and Ko et al.
Let's reconcile the Bar Raiser program. The goal is "Every person hired should be better than 50 percent of those currently in similar roles". With 6% of people on PIPs every year, we can assume they fall predominantly on the old cohort. Do they? Is the BR working?
Replying to @GergelyOrosz
Mainstream media is acting like this attitude is new from FANG. It’s not.
Amazon puts ~6% of people on PIPs every year as a quota. Netflix has the “keeper test” and just laid off some engineers. Google did the same as FB a few months ago (more bonuses, higher expectations)…
This ins't happening - take a look at the duplicate chat apps from Google, the re-invention of the data wheel at Netflix, and I have no idea what Meta is even doing with that much r&d. Instead of engineers, who is firing the executives who are greenlighting so many bad products?
Replying to @GergelyOrosz
Mainstream media is acting like this attitude is new from FANG. It’s not.
Amazon puts ~6% of people on PIPs every year as a quota. Netflix has the “keeper test” and just laid off some engineers. Google did the same as FB a few months ago (more bonuses, higher expectations)…
This job comes with visa and relocation support for our Berlin, Germany office.
jobs.lever.co/rapidapi/811d2…
there are actually only three business models
1. sell reach (ads are a vehicle, what you are selling is _reach_)
2. facilitate and take a cut of transactions
3. build and sell IP
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
vgill retweeted
Yes, looks like a text book case for Batfish
this reads very much like something open source Batfish from @intentionet is designed to catch
let's talk about empowerment - empowered to do what? Most of the time people talk about empowerment, they really mean abdication. Empowerment without alignment is brownian motion. What percentage of engineering leaders are actually good at alignment?
Replying to @GergelyOrosz
The disaster is brewing as we’re talking about an engineering org where teams are empowered. Now they’re going to get micromanaged.
Of course, this VP doesn’t know this as they are coming from an organisation where micromanaging teams is what got them to where they are today.
Since this has gone silent when asked the specifics, maybe someone here can help answer.
Replying to @GergelyOrosz
Who are these modern, fast-moving companies? What is the figure of merit being used here. How do they organize, report out and manage dependencies?
What in the hell was the thesis a year ago then? How many more points of data do we need that most VCs are clowns?
vgill retweeted
If I was Tiger, I’d simply read a few twitter threads from VCs with only a couple of years of experience investing and readjust my strategy to make the best returns
needs @databricks and @SnowflakeDB
This quoted post is unavailable.
This is a great thread but not for the surface reasons. If leading private/public market investors actually believed this story, who was fueling the mania the past few years? It wasn't us, it was those other folks over there? TL;DR everyone is a genius post-facto.













