अग्ग्निरस्मि जन्न्मना
new delhi
Joined July 2009
- Tweets89.1K
- Following216
- Followers12.6K
- Likes5.1K
மோஹித பாரதஂவாஜ retweeted
She's wrong too. We say nutan varsha abhinandan. Some say saal mubarak unfortunately.
மோஹித பாரதஂவாஜ retweeted
Any serious country will take action. But we all know the truth.
"If you think that I fought the war for you, then it is your misunderstanding. I did not fight the war for you; I fought it for the honor of my lineage. And as for you, just as ghee becomes unfit for consumption after being licked by a dog, you are no longer eligible for me."
~ Rama to Sita
Will the director of Ramayana show this reality in Part 2? 🤔
மோஹித பாரதஂவாஜ retweeted
मेरा गाँव जाट बहुल गाँव है।मेरी याद में ही मेरे गाँव में बहुत बढ़िया मंदिर बन गया है।हर साल कावड़ आती है जिसमे सबसे ज़्यादा जाट जाते हैं हरिद्वार।पिछले कुछ सालो में ही जाट सालासर और खाटू श्याम जी भी खूब जाने लगे हैं।मथुरा वृंदावन भी खूब घूमने जाने लगे।और ये सब तब हुआ जब सोशल मीडिया पे खूब तो यूनियनिस्ट मिशन वालो ने चुत्तड़ पटक लिए।थाई चंपाई अंड बंड संड अपनी मरवा गए खूब लेकिन हिंदू धर्म के प्रचार प्रसार मान्यताओं को फैलने से ना रोक पाये।
जाट का सबसे बड़ा दुश्मन कौन हैं: ब्राह्मण, राजपूत अथवा बनिया?
इस प्रश्न का गहराई से उत्तर देने से पहले, मैं बनिया को इस सूची से बाहर करना चाहूँगा।
यह बात सच है कि ब्रिटिश काल में ग्रामीण स्तर पर जाटों ने अपना सबसे बड़ा बनिया को चिह्नित किया, ना कि ब्राह्मण अथवा राजपूत को। कारण यह था कि ब्रिटिश काल लगान की उँची दरों के कारण किसान क़र्ज़ के जाल में बुरी तरह फँस जाते थे।
उस समय ग्रामीण स्तर पर उधारी पर धन का अथवा उधारी पर परचून पाने का एकमात्र स्रोत बनिया था -- और बनिया 60% ब्याज दर पर धन अथवा परचून उधार देता था। ब्याज की यह दर इतनी अधिक उँची थी कि यदि कोई परिवार एक बार कोई छोटा-बड़ा क़र्ज़ ले लेता, तो उसकी कई पीढ़ियाँ उस क़र्ज़ को चुकाते-चुकाते मर जाती थी।
लेकिन आज पूरी आर्थिक संरचना बदल चुकी हैं। आज खेती की उपज पर किसान को कोई लगान नहीं चुकानी पड़ती हैं। आज आपको क़र्ज़ बैंकों से मिल जाता हैं। आज प्रत्येक व्यक्ति बनिया बन सकता हैं। आज कोई भी व्यक्ति किसी भी प्रकार का धंधा अथवा दुकानदारी शुरू कर सकता हैं -- बस शर्त यह है कि आपका व्यवहार इसके अनुकूल हो।
अब बात आती हैं ब्राह्मण की। ब्राह्मण की हिन्दू सभ्यता में वो ही भूमिका है जो जंगल में लोमड़ी की हैं। वस्तुतः हिन्दू सभ्यता की सारी नींव ब्राह्मण के बने हुए वैचारिक मकड़जाल पर टिकी हुई हैं। ब्राह्मण को यह सहन है कि वो स्वयं भूख से मर जाए, पर उसको यह सहन नहीं हैं कि कोई अन्य हिन्दू उससे अधिक रोटी खा ले। ब्राह्मण अपनी एक आँख फुड़वा सकता हैं, बस शर्त यह कि अन्य हिन्दुओं की दोनों आँखें फोड़ी जाये।
ब्राह्मण हिन्दू धर्म का मालिक हैं, पर ब्राह्मण के लिए हिन्दू धर्म का एकमात्र उद्देश्य यह कि अन्य हिन्दू -- जिसको वो शूद्र कहता हैं -- उसको कंधों पर बिठाए रखें और उसको उनके कान में मुतने दे। बस। ब्राह्मण को इससे घंटा फ़र्क़ नहीं पड़ता हैं कि कोई अन्य हिन्दू ईश्वर को माने अथवा नहीं माने, एक देवता को पूजे अथवा करोड़ों देवताओं को पूजे, कोई पूजा करे अथवा नहीं करें।
ब्राह्मण के लिए प्रत्येक ग़ैर ब्राह्मण हिन्दू शूद्र है। लेकिन समय, स्थान एवं परिस्थिति के अनुसार ब्राह्मण यह तय करता हैं कि कौन शूद्र क्षत्रिय बनेगा, कौन शूद्र वैश्य बनेगा और कौन शूद्र अछूत बनेगा। जैसे राजू नाम की जाति वर्तमान में क्षत्रिय है, क्योंकि यह जाति ब्राह्मण के इसारे पर अन्य जातियों के पीछे भौंकने के लिए तैयार रहती है। समय-समय पर ब्राह्मण ही इस जाति को ब्राह्मण इशारा देता है कि अब किस पर भौंकना हैं।
सो जाटों को ऐसा लगता है कि राजपूत उनका दुश्मन है, पर वास्तविकता में ऐसा नहीं हैं। ब्राह्मण का इशारा मिलने पर राजपूत जाट पर भौंकता हैं और स्वयं परदे के पीछे छुपा हुआ रहता है। तो जाट का सबसे बड़ा दुश्मन ब्राह्मण हैं। ब्राह्मण से छुटकारा पाने का एकमात्र उपाय हिन्दू धर्म को सम्पूर्ण रूप से त्यागना है। हिन्दू प्रतीकों, चिह्नों, व्यवहारों, संस्कारों, कर्मकांडों और यहाँ तक कि भाषाओं से भी आपको पूर्ण मुक्ति प्राप्त करनी होगी, यदि आप ब्राह्मण से मुक्ति चाहते हो।
மோஹித பாரதஂவாஜ retweeted
My college years were spent in Kolkata living in PG accommodation. There were Biharis, Odiyas, Nepalis, Mizos, Bhutias and Kukis.
We had a group that used to hang out together. Comprised mainly of Biharis, Bengalis, Odiyas and the Kukis (10-12 of us).
After one evening of playing cards and chit chat, the Kukis got carried away and started boasting that they don't consider themselves to be part of India and that Indian Army was occupying Manipuri territory.
I don't need to tell you what happened after that
🤣🤣
Caleb has done his small part to being the dark side of "North East" (basically eastern India) to focus.
We are all sympathetic to sporadic cases of Delhi people calling them chinks. We all welcome them here in Bangalore.
But in their own states they ban Diwali like 15th century inquisitors & there are unaddressed cases of anti 'mainland' racism.
I've seen Manipuris, Mizos, Nagas form their own groups in Bangalore and they dont mix with locals any more than they have to. Locals are all very friendly to them and I want to keep it that way.
There is no 'north east' and 'mainland' first of all.
Need to change that attitude in North east India and integrate better.
மோஹித பாரதஂவாஜ retweeted
"Muh Nazrul composed a song for Ma Kali saar, now settle hordes of Kanglu infiltrators in your homeland."
மோஹித பாரதஂவாஜ retweeted
You cannot have sex with the girl that you have know to be married to for months prior to marriage but completely ok to sleep with the guy you met at a club or on bumble
The concept of a honeymoon still makes sense to me, but who came up with this whole Suhaag Raat tradition?
In a country where arranged marriages are still common, how can we expect two people who barely know each other, sometimes haven't even met properly before the wedding, to suddenly have sex on the very first night?
Indian parents seriously need to rethink this mindset. You're practically sending your daughter to live with a stranger and expecting her to fulfil marital duties from day one. And if she refuses or says she's not comfortable, suddenly it's about the family's honour and the parents' reputation.
What kind of संस्कार is this, where a woman is expected to undress and get physically intimate with someone just because a wedding ceremony has taken place? Marriage is not consent, and a wedding night is not an obligation. A woman's comfort and choice should matter more than society's expectations.
-(Symbolic image for representation purposes only.)
மோஹித பாரதஂவாஜ retweeted
There’s another Hindu tradition. Of not consummating marriage until first marriage anniversary. That’s not prevalent now. Some families practice it for 12 days as symbolic for 12 months.
Nevertheless, if that practice would’ve been more widespread, you’d have done RR on that too
The concept of a honeymoon still makes sense to me, but who came up with this whole Suhaag Raat tradition?
In a country where arranged marriages are still common, how can we expect two people who barely know each other, sometimes haven't even met properly before the wedding, to suddenly have sex on the very first night?
Indian parents seriously need to rethink this mindset. You're practically sending your daughter to live with a stranger and expecting her to fulfil marital duties from day one. And if she refuses or says she's not comfortable, suddenly it's about the family's honour and the parents' reputation.
What kind of संस्कार is this, where a woman is expected to undress and get physically intimate with someone just because a wedding ceremony has taken place? Marriage is not consent, and a wedding night is not an obligation. A woman's comfort and choice should matter more than society's expectations.
-(Symbolic image for representation purposes only.)
மோஹித பாரதஂவாஜ retweeted
IMO the bauddha and jaina versions are written in bad faith and should not even be considered as a version of rAmAyaNa. The Thai version is alright, and matches with later Indian tradition where he is not a bachelor + you have Thai mantravAdin-s with expertise in hanuman mantra-s
If the Ramayana is pure history, which version is correct given over 300 exist? In the Buddhist version, Rama is exiled for 12 years; in the Thai Ramakien, Hanuman is not celibate; in the Adhyatma Ramayana (from the Brahmanda Purana), there are two Sitas.
I neither claim it is historical nor deny it; I am uninterested in this debate. Reading it, I see myself: lower mind as Ravana, higher mind as Rama, Lakshmana as Buddhi, Vibhishana as conscience, Kumbhakarna as inertia, Hanuman as Prana (devotion, attention, commitment).
We waste time on this needless debate and insult the Ramayana, which surpasses history. Truly understanding it lets you recognize both Ravana and Rama within yourself; invoking Hanuman, you cross the ocean from Lanka to Ayodhya; darkness to light. That is true Diwali. Otherwise, you practice pakhand in its name every year.
Be self-honest!
Do not indulge in its commercialization and politicization by politicians, Bollywood, and influencers.
மோஹித பாரதஂவாஜ retweeted
SRI RAMA PRANAAM
On the auspicious occasion of Govardhan Puja please consider donating Yadav Shakti to them following Gaushalas
suparnanyasa.in/donation/
UPI ID: suptru770@idfcbank @vvaayu
Or
DAKSHINA VRINDAVAN UPI: DVGAUSHALA@SBI @daksinvrindavan
(NON SPONSORED)
AMME NARAYANA 🪔
மோஹித பாரதஂவாஜ retweeted
Crackers have been an integral part of the diwali traditions forever. Loud ones.
மோஹித பாரதஂவாஜ retweeted
It's not a history.
Rama is devta not a bhoot of the past.
There are proper ways to approach him . One should follow them if he is interested in Rama.
And if you want to play history history then keep digging. The day you find history we will support you 😴
If the Ramayana is pure history, which version is correct given over 300 exist? In the Buddhist version, Rama is exiled for 12 years; in the Thai Ramakien, Hanuman is not celibate; in the Adhyatma Ramayana (from the Brahmanda Purana), there are two Sitas.
I neither claim it is historical nor deny it; I am uninterested in this debate. Reading it, I see myself: lower mind as Ravana, higher mind as Rama, Lakshmana as Buddhi, Vibhishana as conscience, Kumbhakarna as inertia, Hanuman as Prana (devotion, attention, commitment).
We waste time on this needless debate and insult the Ramayana, which surpasses history. Truly understanding it lets you recognize both Ravana and Rama within yourself; invoking Hanuman, you cross the ocean from Lanka to Ayodhya; darkness to light. That is true Diwali. Otherwise, you practice pakhand in its name every year.
Be self-honest!
Do not indulge in its commercialization and politicization by politicians, Bollywood, and influencers.
Bolne vala hindi mein to bol raha hai to sunne vale ko bhi hindi mein hi sunna chahiye, vo kaahe angrej hua ja raha
9
425
