Erik van Zuidam (@vzuidam) header
Erik van Zuidam (@vzuidam) profile picture

Rijnlands organiseren, Vrijheid& veiligheid, Orde & Chaos, Bruggen ipv muren, Symbioceen, Matriarchaat, Mens = natuur, Groen ipv bruin, Ad Hominem = Blok.

Noord NL, Netherlands
Joined January 2009
Photo by Erik van Zuidam (@vzuidam)Photo by Erik van Zuidam (@vzuidam)Photo by Erik van Zuidam (@vzuidam)Photo by Erik van Zuidam (@vzuidam)Photo by Erik van Zuidam (@vzuidam)Photo by Erik van Zuidam (@vzuidam)Photo by Erik van Zuidam (@vzuidam)Photo by Erik van Zuidam (@vzuidam)
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
Replying to @atrupar
Voters: We want health care and safe food. Trump: Best I can do is reverse the ban on sonic booms over the country.
1
11
111
7,230
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
“Alle Marokkanen terug naar Istanbul” vibes.
Deze man heeft gewonnen. Allemaal naar New York nu voor “gratis alles”. 🎉
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Abdul El-Sayed won de Senaatsverkiezing in de staat Michigan, niet in New York. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Unit…
39
57
3
1,038
16,381
Het karakter van Mona Keijzer in beeld.
We hebben méér van dit soort kritische journalisten nodig: instagram.com/demarkeronline…
2
2
28
386
De vlucht naar voren...
Netanyahu in juni 2026: "Ik wil de Amerikaanse hulp stoppen. Het is als welzijn; ik wil het niet. Onze economie is niet langer een kleine economie... we kunnen onszelf deze fractie van een procent van ons BBP financieren die we van de VS ontvangen. Ik wil dat dit proces dit jaar al begint." Het beëindigen van de VS hulp is wederzijds en al maanden in de maak:
1
125
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
Deze man heeft gewonnen. Allemaal naar New York nu voor “gratis alles”. 🎉
Democrat Nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan Abdul El-Sayed wants open borders and no deportations: “We as a country, I believe, owe it to the world to open our doors.” Get out and VOTE Republican against this.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Abdul El-Sayed won de Senaatsverkiezing in de staat Michigan, niet in New York. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Unit…
1,299
150
215
925
196,016
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
Statement from DNC Jewish American Council Leadership regarding @AbdulElSayed
1,861
3,882
486
30,302
1,834,263
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
Waar ik vooral over onder de indruk ben is de hoeveelheid desinformatie die WNL en @NickiVerweij hier verspreiden. Nee, een foetus van 23 weken is geen kindje dat "klaar is maar dat alleen nog een beetje moet groeien". De foetus kan ook nog niet ademen en huilen, want daarvoor moeten de longen ontwikkeld zijn. De cijfers over de overlevingskansen van 70% of 80% kloppen ook voor geen meter, en in vrijwel alle gevallen is het géén gezond kindje als het na 23 weken al naar buiten komt, maar waarschijnlijk zwaar gehandicapt en met een heel kleine overlevingskans. Dit is echt je reinste emo-TV zonder dat er een deskundige bij zit die deze mensen corrigeert. Heel schadelijk voor het draagvlak voor abortus.
Doe mij een lol en luister even naar Nicki Pouw-Verweij @NickiVerweij over abortussen tussen 22-24 weken op niet-medische basis. En als u dan klaar bent met luisteren kunt u haast niet anders dan onder de indruk zijn wat Nicki hier zegt. @SamHagens was het in ieder geval wel. @wierdduk
208
13
13
127
23,585
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
JUST IN: Apple Maps has put all the buildings back in Gaza, because the easiest solution to a genocide is to pretend it isn't happening. Image on the right is from Google, showing the current reality.
511
10,680
402
46,486
1,655,195
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
"Het lijkt erop dat het uitsluiten van PRO door @VVD een rekening heeft gecreëerd die ooit betaald moet worden, en die de VVD maar voor zich uit blijft schuiven" #wnlopzondag De VVD én @D66 @cdavandaag, die hun partner niet dwingen om hun verlies te nemen.
7
16
57
1,742
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
Mr Burnham, Silencing dissent did not use to be a British value. And certainly not a Labour value! I know something about being banned. In 2024, the German state banned me from political activity on its soil, even by video link. My crime was helping organise a congress in Berlin congress, along with German Jews, about the genocide in Gaza. So I write as someone who has seen at first hand how quickly a liberal democracy sheds its liberalism once the subject turns to Palestine. Now the UK government has banned Andreas Malm, a respected Swedish academic and author, from entering Britain to speak at the launch of Tribune. For generations, Tribune has given a voice to democrats, socialists and anyone who refuses to accept injustice as the natural order. Keeping one of Europe's important thinkers away from its platform is an act of political censorship, plain and simple. Andy Burnham's admirers like to think of him as the cuddly antidote to Keir Starmer's stone cold managerialism. This decision shows otherwise. When it comes to silencing those who stand up against the genocide of Palestinians, the new Prime Minister is just as authoritarian and just as callous as the man he replaced. Only the smile is different. Lift the ban. Let Andreas Malm speak. And let Tribune hold its launch without the state deciding who may address it. theguardian.com/uk-news/2026…
67
1,296
52
2,621
78,277
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
🚨 A Venezuela era só o aperitivo. O prato principal era o Brasil! Donald Trump acaba de escancarar sua lógica imperialista: segundo ele, o dinheiro obtido com o petróleo venezuelano já teria pagado, várias vezes, os custos da guerra no Irã. E adivinhem o que estava na mira desse laranjão maluco? As riquezas do Brasil! Terras raras, petróleo e minerais estratégicos. A Reuters revelou que o acesso às nossas reservas era um objetivo da Casa Branca e poderia ser facilitado com Flávio Bolsonaro no poder. Agora imaginem o tamanho do estrago com a família Bolsonaro entregando nossa soberania de bandeja para Trump, enquanto buscava proteção política nos Estados Unidos. O projeto era transformar nossas riquezas em instrumento dos interesses americanos. A Venezuela mostra até onde essa ambição pode chegar. O Brasil não é colônia dos Estados Unidos. E nossas riquezas não existem para financiar as loucuras de Trump nem os interesses do clã Bolsonaro! 🇧🇷
946
12,260
508
61,050
3,678,019
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
This is not Hiroshima, this's Gaza. Gaza is nearly 3 times smaller than Hiroshima, and Israel dropped 223,000+ tonnes of explosives, equivalent of ~15 "Little Boy" ATOMIC BOMBS, on Gaza. The world hasn’t seen anything like the destruction in Gaza since Second World War.
170
2,369
87
4,015
43,564
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
Explosive admission! The head of the Mossad, David Barnea, admits that Israel used ordinary Iranians as tools to protect Mossad operatives in the country. Rarely will you find a more crude admission of how Israel deliberately and carelessly put thousands of people it claimed it sought to liberate in harm’s way: In June 2025, the Israeli spy agency deliberately published multiple videos in real time of its agents acting against in Iran to compel the Iranian government to arrest as many people as possible. “We wanted to make sure they arrested so many people in Iran that they wouldn’t be able to distinguish the wheat [the actual Mossad agents] from the chaff and would eventually release everyone,” he said. “You have to imagine that when you arrest 21,000 people, even if you’ve caught an agent or two, eventually you have to release them... the IRGC would have no way of knowing who was a real agent with such a vast number of detainees." Barnea added that many of those arrested or executed by the IRGC as “Mossad agents” had nothing to do with the agency. jpost.com/middle-east/iran-n…
291
3,767
305
7,927
414,910
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
Marco Rubio is lying. Iran has not spent the decades since 1979 waging war on its neighbours. It has spent those decades under attack, and much of that history is documented in the records of the United Nations itself. On 22 September 1980, nineteen months after the revolution, Saddam Hussein invaded Iran and seized Iranian territory, including Khorramshahr. The Security Council waited six days, allowing Iraq to consolidate its territorial gains, before adopting Resolution 479. The resolution merely called on “both Iran and Iraq” to cease the use of force and accept mediation. It condemned nothing, identified no aggressor and demanded no withdrawal. Compare this with Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Within hours of Iraqi forces entering Kuwait, the Security Council adopted Resolution 660, condemning the invasion and demanding Iraq’s immediate and unconditional withdrawal. It was the same aggressor and the same Council. The difference was the victim. Washington was not neutral. In 1982, it removed Iraq from its list of state sponsors of terrorism and shared battlefield intelligence with Baghdad while Saddam used mustard and nerve agents against Iranian soldiers and chemical weapons against the people of Sardasht, in violation of the 1925 Geneva Protocol. The Security Council condemned the use of chemical weapons while refraining from naming Iraq. Iran had every reason to retaliate, yet never resorted to chemical warfare. In 1991, in his report pursuant to Resolution 598, the UN Secretary-General formally attributed responsibility for initiating the conflict to Iraq. Iran’s military engagements since then have followed the same pattern: response, not initiative. When ISIS reached the gates of Baghdad and Erbil in 2014, Iran was among the first to provide military advisers and weapons. It played a central role in defeating the group in Iraq and Syria, operating at the invitation of both governments. Its 2024 strikes against Israel were in response to the bombing of its diplomatic premises in Damascus and the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran, where he was an official guest of the Iranian state. In June 2025, Israel attacked Iran two days before a scheduled round of nuclear negotiations. This year’s war began in late February with a joint US-Israeli military campaign. Iran’s strikes across the Persian Gulf are responses to attacks launched from American military bases on the territory of neighbouring states. If @SecRubio is looking for a "regime" that has made war on its neighbours a recurring instrument of policy, he need not look far. Israel has invaded Lebanon four times since 1978 and carried out military strikes against Iraq, Syria, Tunisia, Yemen, Qatar and Iran. It has occupied Palestinian territory since 1967. In July 2024, the International Court of Justice declared Israel’s continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territory unlawful and found that its settlement policies and practices amount to annexation of large parts of that territory. In September 2025, a UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza. Israel also possesses an estimated 90 nuclear warheads, remains outside the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and has no comprehensive IAEA safeguards agreement, even as it attacks the safeguarded nuclear facilities of a state party to the Treaty in the name of non-proliferation. Rubio has the history backwards. Since 1979, Iran has been the target of aggression, not its author. In most of those wars, Washington was either arming the aggressor or fighting alongside it.
Marco Rubio on Iran: Iran has been waging war against its neighbors in the region since 1979.
70
501
25
1,236
23,415
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
Oh Donald, what on earth is this? An enormous American aircraft carrier parked on top of Greenland? Is this your latest fantasy of owning our country? Here’s a reality check for you: The United States is planning two new military facilities in Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig, along with upgrades to Pituffik Space Base. That’s military cooperation, NOT American ownership. You signed an agreement recognizing Greenland’s right to self-determination and the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Denmark. Did you forget what you signed, Donald? Or are you just hoping your voters can’t read either?
Trump posts an image depicting Greenland as a giant American military colony
228
806
38
3,426
61,256
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
BREAKING: TRUMP SAYS IRAN WAR COSTS DO NOT MATTER BECAUSE HE MADE SO MUCH MONEY LOOTING VENEZUELA “Any money we've spent in Iran, we've more than made up for with what we did in Venezuela, taking in hundreds of billions of dollars, many, many times.”
1,634
4,896
923
13,285
950,221
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
These are the "American patriots" and "concerned Europeans" you're talking to on X. There's no reason to argue with computers. Just block them all and move on.
201
3,585
254
10,212
253,969
Erik van Zuidam retweeted
Trei tancuri petroliere aflate pe lista neagră și care transportă 140.000 de tone de combustibil rusesc fac cercuri în Atlantic. Casa Albă a sunat traderii americani să cumpere motorina lui Putin, dar literalmente zero cumpărători au răspuns la telefon. În panică din cauza prețurilor la combustibil care au explodat chiar înainte de alegerile de la mijloc de mandat, Casa Albă a încheiat pe 9 octombrie un acord cu Kremlinul prin care sunt ocolite interdicțiile de import. Trump se aștepta ca traderii de pe Wall Street să se repeadă la motorina rusească ieftină. În schimb, aceștia au tratat marfa ca pe deșeuri nucleare. De ce? Pentru că aspectul legal al afacerii le poate fi fatal. Congresul a incriminat în mod explicit importurile de petrol rusesc în 2022. O scutire pe hârtie din partea Trezoreriei SUA nu are nicio greutate împotriva unei interdicții a Congresului, ceea ce înseamnă că orice comerciant care se atinge de motorina sau benzina rusească riscă închisoare federală și citații din partea Congresului. Haosul de pe ocean este de un absurd kafkian. Petrolierul Agioi Fanendes a plecat din Sankt Petersburg cu destinația New York, dar s-a oprit în mijlocul oceanului și așteaptă „noi instrucțiuni”, traducere maritimă pentru „plutim fără țintă pentru că nimeni nu vrea să ne cumpere marfa”. Restul flotei din umbră a lui Putin nu se simte nici ea mai bine. Talisman este inclus pe lista neagră de Washington și Europa, în timp ce Leruo este interzis în întreaga UE, Marea Britanie și Canada. Cu toate acestea, oamenii lui Trump de la Casa Albă au înroșit telefoanele în încercarea de a ancora navele rusești în porturile americane. Însă reacția Wall Street-ului a fost rece ca gheața. Chiar și cu Moscova oferind reduceri substanțiale, traderii de petrol de pe piața gri s-au ascuns pe sub birouri. Foști oficiali ai Trezoreriei SUA au avertizat deja că orice contact cu aceste nave este sinucidere corporativă, așa că 140.000 de tone de motorină plutesc în Atlantic fără un singur cumpărător la orizont. În plus, Congresul a apucat barosul. Democrații și câțiva republicani au avertizat cumpărătorii cu privire la riscul comiterii unei infracțiuni federale, în timp ce senatorul Blumenthal a trimis scrisori de avertisment direct către proprietarii navelor, cerându-le să facă imediat drumul înapoi. Guvernatoarea statului New Jersey, Mikie Sherrill, fost ofițer de marină și procuror federal, a numit afacerea lui Trump „coruptă și ilegală”. Ea a pregătit deja o serie de măsuri pentru a bloca terminalele principale de combustibil de pe coasta de est de la Bayonne, Linden, Carteret, Perth Amboy și Port Reading. Cu porturile americane închise și amenințările Congresului planând deasupra capetelor, Washingtonul și Moscova se agită frenetic în căutarea unei soluții de ieșire din încurcătură. Specialiștii din energie spun că, fără un singur cumpărător american dispus să riște, motorina rusă respinsă va trebui descărcată în America de Sud la prețuri derizorii, în pierdere. Planul disperat al Casei Albe pentru a ocoli legea federală, a scădea prețurile la motorină înainte de alegerile din 3 noiembrie și a direcționa bani către Moscova se pare că a eșuat. La fel ca navele din flota fantomă a lui Putin, care rătăcesc pe mări și oceane, fără niciun port unde să acosteze. (Sebastian Duma / FB)
168
1,916
228
8,927
1,032,922