The Real Art Watson

I’ve spent 28 million dollars over the last nine years suing the United States government to find out what science actually backs the claim that vaccines are safe and effective. Here’s what I can tell you for certain. There has never been a safety trial using a saline placebo injection- one group vaccinated, one group given saline- for any vaccine we give our children. Not one. So when someone says there’s a mountain of evidence, that autism has already been studied and debunked, that statement is categorically false. The small amount of research that exists was conducted by the pharmaceutical industry itself, nobody independent. The same companies standing to make billions of dollars are the ones who produced the only data we have.

This mom just walked into a Florida health department hearing and declared: “We do not co-parent with the government.” “This … is not about whether one is for or against vaccines.” “It’s about medical freedom.” “And … informed consent.” Tara Hill is the “proud mother of four completely vaccine-free children, ages 21 and under, who are all healthy and thriving.” “They would be part of the control group in the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study that the government will not perform.” “Because Big Pharma and their lobbyists won’t let them.” “If they did, they would know that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “Florida’s own Parental Bill of Rights explicitly reads that the state may not infringe upon the fundamental rights of a parent to direct the education or the health care of their children.” “Vaccine mandates for school entry violate both of those rights.” “And essentially force parents to defer their God-given authority to the state.” “I stand with Surgeon General Dr. Ladapo and all liberty-minded parents here today in the effort to eliminate vaccine mandates.” @FLSurgeonGen @HealthyFla

🇺🇸HEADS-UP PATRIOTS🇺🇸 The Democrat/Media Complex is sniffing around the Democracy Files and our exposing of the ongoing Color Revolution. I'm not talking about marginal podcasters--I'm talking about the head of the snake. They will attempt to do two things: 1. Discredit @DataRepublican, the patriots who have worked with her on this project, and all of us who have supported getting this plot out into the light of day. 2. Claim that the framing of those files as an ongoing Color Revolution is a lie, and in fact the ex-USAID/CIA/State/military people behind this are merely true patriots trying to prevent Trump from overthrowing "our democracy." Such a story will inevitably include a litany of "proof" that Donald Trump's genuine election integrity efforts are somehow actually a nefarious plot to disenfranchise lawful Democrat voters and steal "our democracy." The very words you will read and hear will be a part of the framing of Trump's "loss of legitimacy" that is essential to the plot's success. In other words, these stories that are about to come out from the premier Democrat/Media Complex outlet(s) are actually part of the plot itself, and serve as part of the "Narrative" component of color revolutions that I have written about. Be on the lookout for these nefarious propaganda pieces in the days ahead. As I have said repeatedly, the best way to counter this false narrative is to get everyone in your circle to listen for 4 minutes and 31 seconds to the very first drop DR put out on October 22. That tape alone starkly reveals the entire plot in the plotters' own words. Last point; never forget that these people will always do one thing that is their "tell": they will always accuse you of what they are actually up to themselves. As my wife's X tagline always says: "Peace and be prepared."

The government making recommendations for medical procedures in this case vaccines, must be HALTED. It is not the role of government to have vaccine recommendations with categories and levels of recommendations when the science is never settled, and medical procedure recommendations must always be individualized with proper informed consent. Informed consent necessitates full discussion of all risks and benefits, includes a Q&A component, and then the free ability to decline. That ability to decline cannot be tied to civil liberty infringement-it cannot be tied to participation in society, work, or school and especially not church. We need separation of medicine and state. No person has ever obtained proper informed consent for any vaccine.

You will not believe how corrupt the FDA’s process for vaccine safety testing is. “It’s just smoke and mirrors.” Send this to someone who still believes Pharma’s “safe and effective” narrative. New vaccines are never tested against a placebo. Bret Weinstein: “That’s jaw-dropping in and of itself.” But it gets worse. “They test it against something that they claim is a placebo… the last version of the shot.” “If the last version of the shot was demonstrated to be safe, and the new version of the shot doesn’t do any more harm than the last version, then it’s safe, right?” Jeffrey Tucker: “If it’s slightly better, then you report the relative efficacy.” “It’s a tenth of a percent, and that’s where you get your 95% effectiveness.” @jeffreytucker @BretWeinstein @thedarkhorsepod

Mr. President, You signed the order. Thank you. That was the right move, but It is not enough. Executive Order 14420 tells states to honor religious and medical exemptions and points the Attorney General at the ones that will not. School rules are still state law. The order creates no right a parent or a student can enforce. A new administration can pull it. A court can narrow it. Hospitals and nursing programs are already walking around it. I am a paramedic. I worked through COVID. I watched agencies beg for staff while turning away medics who refused the shot. I was laid off, then rejected, while response times blew out. People died from delays. I was offered good money to give those shots. I would not. I have seen what comes after. Miscarriages. Strokes, heart problems in people who had no business having them. Young cardiac arrests. Turbo Cancers. Most of us who refuse now were not born refusing. We watched it, or it hit our own house, and that harm changed our minds. Religious exemption is the wrong door. It makes a man dress a risk decision up as theology so a school board can grade his faith. A simple “no” should be enough. In a free country you do not have to cite a verse to keep a needle out of your arm or your child’s. The loophole that is gutting the field is the clinical site. Nursing and medical programs tell students the hospital demands the shots, and you cannot graduate without the rotation. The school blames the hospital. The hospital blames policy. The student either takes what they do not want or leaves a job we cannot fill. That is not medicine. That is a woke science filter. If this order is the line, put it in statute. Vaccination status cannot decide school enrollment, program admission, clinical placement, graduation, licensure, or employment. Hospitals that take federal money, or take students, do not get to require a shot that was refused. No essay. No sincerity test. Refusal is the exemption. Leave the product on the shelf for anyone who wants it. Stop barring the people who do not. Argument has not moved the other side. Injury has. We should not need more injuries to write this down. Access stays open. Force ends. Harry Fisher Paramedic God bless

This spine tingling moment just happened at the Sen. Johnson Hospital Protocols Hearing. I can understand exactly why the room erupted. Here’s an attorney with 50 years experience. At the start of covid, he gets flooded with requests to make Hospitals give early treatment protocols. But the result of his work is the part really blew my mind. 95.8% of the cases he won ,to force the Hospital to administer Ivermectin. Survived. But then I heard the contrast of what happened when he lost his cases... the patients who had to go with standard of care hospital protocols which included Remdesivir. Ralph Lorigo Esq. - “Where I lost.... Every. Single. Person. Died” I’m left speechless.

This is great. This is my comment submitted to the request for comment on the CDC vaccine schedule. The government making recommendations for medical procedures, vaccines, must be reassessed. It's not the role of government to make vaccine recommendations. The science is never settled. Medical procedure recommendations must always be individualized with proper informed consent. Informed consent necessitates full discussion of all risks and benefits, include a Q&A component, and the free ability to decline. The ability to decline cannot be tied to civil liberty infringement-it can't be tied to participation in society, work, or school and especially not church. We need separation of medicine and state. Proper informed consent has never been obtained for any vaccine. The current vaccine categories are confusing and blur the lines on informed consent. If there is risk, there must be unencumbered choice. Until we repeal 1986 HR 5546 and the Prep act which removed product liability for vaccine makers, we must be diligent in the disclosure of risks and benefits and ensure informed consent. We must remove all quality measure bonus payments tied to vaccine administration since this creates coercive incentives. Recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of any adverse reaction to vaccines must be included in the process. We must hold practitioners accountable when they delay assessment and treatment of post vaccination side effects/adverse events. Adverse events have treatment options that could prevent permanent harm. The law requires reporting of adverse events. Vaccines should be single virus with only one vaccine given at a time. Written informed consent specific for each vaccine must be obtained. This must be reviewed and signed by parents and the practitioner with a witness and copies given to both parties and include this verbiage: "Contact HHS if your physician does not assess any post vaccination changes to your child's health. Vaccine adverse events are required to be reported to VAERS". The full ingredient list should be reviewed and provided with careful attention to adjuvants/excipients especially with atopic children. Safety and efficacy studies as well as risks and benefits must be reviewed. Nursing phone call the evening of and then 24 hours after the vaccine should occur with any issues assessed and documented. Any significant changes in health conditions should prompt an in-office assessment by practitioner. Encephalitis, for example, is a vaccine adverse event listed for many vaccines. If recognized and treated early with IV steroids/plasmapheresis/IVIGG then permanent brain damage can be prevented. Post vaccination appointments should occur at 3 and 6 months to assesses any changes in health conditions and to determine potential for adverse effects that cannot be otherwise explained. This is where the iatrogenic cause of allergies from some vaccines can be found as well as other adverse non immediate effects. Education on immediate, short-, and long-term vaccine adverse reactions and treatments need to be part of medical education and CME. Any change in health status should pause further vaccination. The differential diagnosis of the adverse event and treatments to resolve must be part of the process. Deviation from this new standard of care will lead to removal of the practitioners' ability to administer vaccines. The 3 current categories should be eliminated. The following information on vaccines should be provided by HHS: "These Vaccines are available in the U.S. For each vaccine information on ingredients including adjuvants/excipients, safety studies, risks, benefits, side effects, why the vaccine is available, and the number of VAERS events reported is listed here. Vaccines should be given after proper written informed consent and discussion with your practitioner. Acceptance of any vaccine should be freely chosen and not coerced/forced. Vaccines no longer will be a requirement for school, work, or any other part of societal participation. It is no longer acceptable to be asked what you are your child's vaccine status is by anyone other than a physician of your choice." This creates true informed consent. The government's role can only be a resource in a free country. Regarding the current categories that vaccines are listed: (i) HPV vaccine should be removed. Studies and lawsuits overseas have shown there is not an acceptable benefit to risk ratio. (ii) We must completely overhaul the idea that more vaccines are better for people already with chronic and other health conditions. This has never been properly studied. The current process is to give more vaccines to asthma/allergy patients even though those patients are more likely to have worsening of allergies with repeated injections. (iii) Immediate recall of all respiratory virus vaccinations. Covid vaccine is a bioweapon. Influenza vaccines have negative overall effect on population health. See 2 attached publications. RSV studies are concerning. A moratorium on all respiratory virus vaccines needs to occur.

1. They did a massive vaccine campaign in PA recently for Measles over the past few months. 2. According to the CDC “Approximately 5% of individuals vaccinated with a measles-containing vaccine develop fever and rash that can be clinically indistinguishable from measles infection.” 3. Have they checked the type of measles - vaccine vs wild ? Again according to cdc -“Serologic assays and currently used diagnostic measles virus RT-qPCR assays (MeV assay) cannot distinguish between vaccine reactions and infections with wild-type virus. However, rapid differentiation of vaccine reactions from infections with virus is critical “ Genotyping to differentiate between wild and vaccine measles is available. “RT-qPCR assay for specific detection of measles vaccine strains that is a more rapid alternative to genotyping and can discriminate between vaccine reactions and wild-type measles infections within hours instead of days.4 This assay (MeVA test) detects regions of the nucleoprotein gene that are specific to and conserved among measles vaccine strains, which are member of genotype A.” cdc.gov/measles/downloads/me… Also this-“Seventy individuals who had received 1 or more doses of measles-containing vaccine transmitted measles virus, resulting in 237 secondary cases.” This is from a recent meta analysis. Link here. tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.…

The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette in the surgery and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. What he does not mention, because nobody mentioned it to him, is who paid for the study. The tobacco companies are at this moment buying advertising space in the Journal of the American Medical Association, and getting it. The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is a fight, but the fight is happening in rooms you will never enter, and the researchers on the wrong side of it are discovering that their funding has dried up. What reaches you is the verdict, delivered as fact. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine. Your butter dish is on notice. The year is 1961. Your doctor prescribes Distaval to your pregnant wife for her morning sickness. It is licensed, modern and marketed as remarkably safe. Thalidomide will leave roughly 10,000 children worldwide with missing and shortened limbs, and thousands more dead before birth, and for months the men in official positions will keep repeating that the drug was approved. It was. Both things are true at once. That is the sentence to remember. The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is entering a benzodiazepine wave that will run for 2 decades and leave a generation of housewives dependent on a pill they were assured was gentle. The dependency risk is understood inside the industry. It has not been shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either. Notice how often that sentence appears in this thread. The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your knees. Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data pointing to roughly double the heart attack risk, and that data will take years to reach the man writing your prescription. By the time the drug is pulled in 2004, the FDA's own safety officer puts the excess heart attacks in 6 figures. Merck settles for $4.85 billion. Nobody goes to prison. Your doctor finds out what he was prescribing at the same time you do: from the news. The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin for your back. The sales rep who visited him last Tuesday was trained to say the addiction risk is under 1%. That figure comes from a 5 sentence letter about hospital patients on short term doses, not a study, and the company knows the difference even if the rep doesn't. Hundreds of thousands of deaths later, Purdue pleads guilty to criminal misbranding. The letter's author spends his retirement explaining what was done with his paragraph. The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol, frowns at one number, and starts you on a statin, for life. Nobody mentions that for people like you, with no heart disease, it takes about 100 of you swallowing it for years to prevent a single heart attack, and the other 99 get the muscles and the memory for free. The trial behind the prescription was funded by the manufacturer. Of course it was. Every year of this thread, it was. Now it is today, and your doctor is confident again. He is confident the bottle of seed oil in your kitchen is heart-healthy, on the same style of evidence that moved you onto margarine. He is confident the statin conversation is closed, though the raw trial data sits with the companies and has never been handed over for independent eyes. He is confident red meat, the food your species was built on, belongs in the same warning breath as cigarettes. He is confident the answer to a metabolic disease is a weekly injection, judged a success by the same trick as 1958: the number on the scale moves, and what the number is made of goes unexamined. He is confident about the pyramid's ghost still printed on the cereal box, and the 5 a day that began life as a marketing campaign with the produce industry's name on the paperwork. Every doctor in this thread was confident. Most were kind. All of them were reading aloud from a script somebody else had written, and the script has been wrong, on the record, in every single decade of your life. He is not the villain. He is the reader. Ask who writes the script. That question has never once been the wrong call, and there has never been a better year to ask it.