Xiahong (吓) Lin (@xhlin) header
Xiahong (吓) Lin (@xhlin) profile picture

Coin, Token, and NFT

Continue Capital HQ
Joined September 2008
Photo by Xiahong (吓) Lin (@xhlin)Photo by Xiahong (吓) Lin (@xhlin)Photo by Xiahong (吓) Lin (@xhlin)Photo by Xiahong (吓) Lin (@xhlin)Photo by Xiahong (吓) Lin (@xhlin)Photo by Xiahong (吓) Lin (@xhlin)Photo by Xiahong (吓) Lin (@xhlin)Photo by Xiahong (吓) Lin (@xhlin)Photo by Xiahong (吓) Lin (@xhlin)
无论是从能源还是算力的角度,比特币都是AI赛道最底层最核心的资产 bitcoin:native
3
6
323
Aave这几天针对KelpDao被黑事件的骚操作直接把币圈最有价值的用户/机构都得罪光了
8
14
604
Web 1.0 = 信息 + Web Web 2.0 = Web 1.0 + User Web 3.0 = Web 2.0 + Crypto
Web 4.0 = Web 3.0 + AI
12
31
906
Web 4.0 = Web 3.0 + AI
9
2
23
1,353
今年元旦好多人祝我“2026快乐”,我现在才反应过来,他们是祝我在以太$2026的时候还能快乐🥹🥹🥹
12
1
17
838
依然对币圈充满希望,依然热泪盈眶🥹
3
7
546
AMM: x * y = k Prediction Market: x + y = 1
18
23
712
一生 $UNI
Voting has concluded on Unification 🦄 125,342,017 YES 742 NO Unified, true to the name After a ~2day vote timelock, 100m UNI will be burned, fee switches will be flipped, labs will turn off frontend fees and focus on the protocol, and more Merry Christmas everyone 🎄
20
27
1,101
Aave的 @StaniKulechov 真的太傻逼了,当年做 ETH Lend,DEFI 火了以后团队币也卖完了。后来以改名 @aave 的名义又获得不少币。现在团队币估计又花光了,想从 swap fee 赚钱被社区反对,就仓促搞一出“挟天子以令诸侯”把一个未成型的提案拿出来投票,这哪是去中心化的 DAO。反观 @Uniswap 就很识相,主动让团队跟社区保持一致利益。
说来 $AAVE 这事来龙去脉有点复杂,堪称“一次返佣引起的圣诞节阴谋分裂”。 首先,有些人可能知道 AAVE 里面也可以 Swap。过去 AAVE 接的底层是 ParaSwap,然后 Paraswap 抽到的费用一部分会返给 AAVE 的 DAO。 最近,在 Aave Labs (开发团队的公司)的斡旋之下,AAVE 把供应商从 ParaSwap 换成了 CowSwap。 但是,CowSwap 的交易返佣不再返给 DAO,而是改为返给 Labs。 这事惹了社区众怒,大家都喷 Labs 中饱私囊。 Labs 也强行解释了,(大意是说) AAVE 的前端属于 Labs,后端才属于 DAO。那么前端的收入,归 Labs 也无可厚非。 接着,有人就发起了提案,这位老哥叫 @eboadom 他是 AAVE 曾经的 CTO,现在是 BGDLabs 的创始人,他们算是 AAVE 的社区生态中坚力量之一吧。 他本意是想探讨一下,能不能把 AAVE 的品牌权“收归国有”,也就是你 Labs 干的好可以继续赚,干不好就要收回 AAVE 的品牌。 要从“精神上和形式上”双双让 DAO 全面执掌 AAVE。 但是 Stani @StaniKulechov 领导的 Labs,却似乎开始搞加速主义,光速把这个讨论贴强行变成了一次公投。 而且公投的时间非常诡异,选择了 12 月 23 日-26 日。 这里容我稍微解释解释: 第一老外圣诞节期间,经常完全不工作+失联;类似于中国人过年对待工作的态度都是“年后再说”。 第二,这只是一个非常早期的讨论贴,正常这个帖子需要讨论 3-6 个月,经过 N 次优化,才会走到公投那一步。 第三,这件事反而变成了 Labs 单方面推动,包括原帖的帖主,都说没想这么快推进公投,未经他允许,他是“被署名”的。 如此仓促、如此时间卡的刚刚好,这让社区进一步愤怒了。可能这导致了,这个据说是 AAVE 榜二大哥的人,怒而砸掉了自己 AAVE 筹码,导致了 $AAVE 大跌。 当然,这背后到底有没有其他阴谋,还有待进一步发掘,我也会保持持续关注。
12
1
25
1,579
现在币圈的价格真的很感人(赶人),我将之称为“币圈赶人时刻”
8
14
431
币圈最傻逼的就是看好一个标的就拉踩其他标的,不去看未来的增量,鼠目寸光只盯着存量内卷,你丫得多穷才会如此孤注一掷?
14
23
831
一生 $UNI
Today, I’m incredibly excited to make my first proposal to Uniswap governance on behalf of @Uniswap alongside @devinawalsh and @nkennethk This proposal turns on protocol fees and aligns incentives across the Uniswap ecosystem Uniswap has been my passion and singular focus for the past 8 years. What started as a small side project is now global financial infrastructure powering thousands of applications with ~$1.8 trillion in annual trading UNI launched in 2020, but for the past 5 years Labs has been unable to meaningfully participate in Uniswap governance, and has been greatly restricted in the ways it can build value for the Uniswap community. That ends today! This restriction was in great part due to a hostile regulatory environment that cost thousands of hours and tens of millions in legal fees. Fortunately, the regulatory environment has shifted This proposal comes from a strong desire to see the Uniswap protocol win as the global decentralized exchange for tokenized value At a high level, the proposal: 1. Turns on protocol fees and uses them to burn UNI 2. Sends @unichain sequencer fees to the UNI burn 3. Burns 100M UNI from the treasury representing the protocol fees that could have been burned if fees were turned on at token launch 4. Introduces Protocol Fee Discount Auctions, a new way to improve LP outcomes and internalize MEV to the protocol 5. Introduces "aggregator hooks” which will turns Uniswap v4 into an onchain aggregator that collects protocol fees on external liquidity sources 6. Focus Labs on driving protocol growth and adoption, including a contractual agreement to only pursue initiatives that align with Uniswap governance interests ^ As part of this, Labs will stop collecting fees on its interface, wallet, and API to supercharge distribution and adoption of the Uniswap protocol 7. Moves Foundation employees to Labs with a shared goal of accelerating protocol growth, under a growth fund from the treasury 8. Move governance-owned Unisocks liquidity to v4 on Unichain and burn the LP position I believe Uniswap protocol can be the primary place tokens are traded. This proposal sets the stage for the next decade of its growth @Uniswap will ship relentlessly over the coming years and supercharge the ecosystem of developers, LPs, and traders building on top I'm so grateful to the community that has made this all possible, and excited for what's next 🦄
9
17
904
整个加密行业只有一个 Google 公司的市值
5
6
465
现在的币圈到处充斥着吮痈舐痔
19
16
731
果然跟我猜想的一样,不是一家人不进一家门
现在发项目得需要创意和策略,我估计 Native Markets 早就在筹划稳定币项目,一看到 USDH 就赶紧提案,最终 @HyperliquidX 接不接受都火了。甚至 Hyperliquid 可能就是计划分拆出 Native Markets 这项目,然后故意假模假样说要招募 USDH 稳定币发行方,后面借势把 Native Markets 投票通过,这直接解决了从 0 到 1 的问题。这些来跪舔的 @Paxos、@ethena,@SkyEcosystem 都成了陪跑的,间接背书了 Native Markets 这项目多么有价值。
62
2
95
1,516
现在发项目得需要创意和策略,我估计 Native Markets 早就在筹划稳定币项目,一看到 USDH 就赶紧提案,最终 @HyperliquidX 接不接受都火了。甚至 Hyperliquid 可能就是计划分拆出 Native Markets 这项目,然后故意假模假样说要招募 USDH 稳定币发行方,后面借势把 Native Markets 投票通过,这直接解决了从 0 到 1 的问题。这些来跪舔的 @Paxos、@ethena,@SkyEcosystem 都成了陪跑的,间接背书了 Native Markets 这项目多么有价值。
39
1
57
2,374
不要看宏观,宏观其实是微观,要看历史,历史观才是宏观。因为人会变但人性不变。
39
1
59
1,960
果然以太涨了,山寨币还是那个鸟样,但是没有人喷以太了
基本上喷以太的都是手里没有大饼持仓,只持有以太和一堆山寨币,因为山寨币不景气,就把气撒在以太上。就像我爸爸以前外面做生意不行就回来打我妈妈,气得我直接冲过去对我爸唱《爸,我回来了》
14
1
1
21
1,625