Yes, Chef Crypto

If $ETH wicks down to $2100-$2200 don’t whine or complain just accumulate the blue coin.

The signs were there. Looks good to test our higher timeframe support. hedera-hashgraph:native

It's time to pay attention to energy again. Some of these charts look absolutely primed after a nice pullback. $TOU holding the multiyear consolidation above the 2014 ATH. $APA sitting just above the 200WMA in what I believe is still the early stages of a massive wave 3 ripper. @krugman87 gets it.

If $ETH wicks down to $2100-$2200 don’t whine or complain just accumulate the blue coin.

It should go without saying, but some are seemingly struggling with the concept of lower vs higher risk entries. If you are trading the mid/high timeframes, then .29 is the only clear/clean invalidation level that you should be focused on. Any entries taken in the lower half of our range (green zone) are generally lower risk entries, as they are closer to invalidation, which means you can typically INCREASE position size. You are trading off a lack of "confirmation" for an aggressive entry with a tighter stop-loss which allows for a larger nominal position size. An entry closer to our range lows than our range highs is the IDEAL entry. Any entries taken in the upper half of our range (red zone) are generally higher risk entries, as they are farther away from invalidation, which means you should typically REDUCE position size. You waited for the reaction off the "ideal entry" before entering yourself, because you wanted to see if the lows would "hold" rather than blindly bidding them. This means you are now entering higher up, further away from invalidation, which means you will generally have to adjust via a smaller nominal position size (assuming we are still using the mid/HTF inval at .29). An entry closer to our range highs is NOT the IDEAL entry, and you MUST adjust for that. If you choose to ignore the entries in the low .30's despite recognizing that .29 is our key invalidation, and you then decide to jump in at the range highs because you didn't want to follow the plan to bid the low .30's where risk was lowest, you must accept and prepare for the possibility that we reject the range highs (again) and get another correction back into the mid our lower portions of our range. At some point when we get to the range highs, we won't reject and we will break through- we all agree on that. Which means if you don't properly position yourself at the lows from before we get to the highs, you are now FORCED to make a sub-par entry, with higher risk, or risk missing the ride completely (you can also enter after a breakout, but that doesn't mean that breakout can't fail, putting you back in the same position as entering at the highs). So, either enter at the "ideal" entries when they come along, or accept you will probably have a harder time to position as we move higher, manage risk accordingly if you are forced to make that decision higher up, and accept responsibility for the outcome (whatever it may be) when it comes. If you can't do the above, then you shouldn't be trading.

$BMNR looking so sexy right now

Still think we can use things such as $CRCL for confluence along with individual crypto names. Clear resistance above and this looks like it wants lower for now. I imagine a break of the red line will coincide with pump action across crypto as a whole. This could take a few weeks imo. Maybe Dec-Jan timeframe just guessing.

Not enough people talking about these charts still $PBR $APA $DVN $TOU.TO Hold them all in my ROTH and will let them stay for years unless we break all these bullish structures.