Bubba3030

There is good reason nobody believes it, and we have the data from 2020, 2022 and 2024 that shows why. Visit unite4freedom.com/reports/ for the full election validity scorecards for 35 states, as well as all the analysis completed to date.

ALASKA, MARC ELIAS & RANKED-CHOICE VOTING: FOLLOW THE MATHEMATICS. WHAT IF SOMEONE COULD INFLUENCE AN ELECTION WITHOUT CHANGING A SINGLE BALLOT? What if all it took was recruiting another candidate with the SAME NAME? That is the question at the center of allegations involving two candidates named Dan Sullivan in Alaska. And the concern is not simply voter confusion. IT IS THE INTERACTION BETWEEN VOTER CONFUSION AND THE MATHEMATICS OF RANKED-CHOICE VOTING. Here’s why that matters. In ranked-choice voting, voters rank candidates by preference. If no candidate receives a majority of first-choice votes, the lowest-performing candidate is eliminated, and eligible ballots transfer to their next remaining choice. Now introduce two candidates with the same name. Some voters may mistakenly rank the wrong person. Those rankings can affect first-choice totals. First-choice totals determine who is eliminated. Elimination determines which ballots transfer. And the sequence of eliminations and transfers can affect the final result. ONE SOURCE OF VOTER CONFUSION. MULTIPLE POTENTIAL MATHEMATICAL CONSEQUENCES. This is why the alleged recruitment of a second Dan Sullivan deserves careful investigation. If someone deliberately recruited a same-name candidate because they understood how voter confusion could interact with ranked-choice tabulation, investigators would need to establish whether that was the intended strategy. And whether it had any measurable effect. NOW FOLLOW THE CONNECTIONS. Prominent election attorney Marc Elias and his law firm have represented Democratic campaigns, including Mary Peltola’s campaign. That relationship does not establish participation in an alleged recruitment scheme. But the underlying questions deserve documented answers: Who recruited the second Dan Sullivan? Who financed or coordinated his candidacy? Was the shared name a deliberate consideration? Did anyone model how that candidacy could affect ranked-choice elimination rounds? What communications connect the candidate to political operatives, campaigns, attorneys, or outside organizations? What do the actual ballot rankings and transfer records reveal? TWO DIFFERENT QUESTIONS REQUIRE TWO DIFFERENT KINDS OF PROOF. Evidence of recruitment, financing, communications, and coordination could establish whether confusion was deliberately engineered. Election records and mathematical modeling could establish how the additional candidacy affected the tabulation—and whether alternative voting patterns could have produced a different result. But the mathematics alone cannot reveal what voters intended. THAT IS THE ACCOUNTABILITY PROBLEM. A ballot can be counted exactly as cast while failing to reflect the choice its voter intended to make. And when ranked-choice voting converts those rankings into successive eliminations and transfers, the consequences of mistaken choices can extend beyond the initial vote totals. The question is whether anyone deliberately attempted to exploit that interaction. AMERICANS CONSENT TO CAST THEIR VOTES. THEY DO NOT CONSENT TO HAVING THEIR CHOICES DELIBERATELY CONFUSED. This deserves an evidence-based investigation—not assumptions of guilt and not automatic dismissal of legitimate questions. Release the relevant candidate records. Examine the recruitment and financing. Preserve the communications. Analyze the ranked-choice tabulation—where unnecessary mathematical complexity, sequential eliminations, and ballot transfers can obscure how voter choices ultimately determine the outcome. Establish what happened, who was involved, and what the evidence actually proves. BECAUSE COUNTING EVERY BALLOT CORRECTLY IS NOT THE SAME AS PROVING EVERY VOTER’S INTENT WAS ACCURATELY EXPRESSED. 🇺🇸 REAL VOTERS. REAL VOTES. REAL RANKINGS. REAL COUNTS. REAL PROOF. #Unite4Freedom #Alaska #RankedChoiceVoting #ElectionIntegrity #MarcElias