PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset) header
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset) profile picture

You asked for my alt. Here it is.

Joined October 2021
Photo by PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset)Photo by PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset)Photo by PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset)Photo by PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset)Photo by PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset)Photo by PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset)Photo by PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset)Photo by PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset)Photo by PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset)Photo by PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š (@3PointAsset)
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
Iโ€™ve been excited about Polygon and the AggLayer for a while but the last two weeks have been holy shit moments. Going to melt some faces as we get into the first half of 2025.
39
27
1
216
15,697
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
ETF buyers going from 0 to 1 are price agnostic. They donโ€™t care if price is 25k, 30k, 45k, 60k. Theyโ€™re buying. If you sold anything in the last 3 months or are willing to sell lower than launch date.. youโ€™re [redacted] Youโ€™ll have another shot with ETH ETF though
1
1
4
1,136
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
This is a common view but I think itโ€™s flawed. Execution/sequencing are dislocated from aggregation Aggregation should be thought of as a service vs an opinionated layer For ex. Arb or OP can have an intra-stack SS they run where they accrue 100% of seq fee/mev, etc (and pay no rent to AggLayer) Imo they would be best served leaning into their strengths there and winning that market vs trying to compete with zk-chads with a massive head start on the AggLayer. They give nothing up by opting into the AggLayer. Yes, they wonโ€™t accrue cross-stack service fees but thatโ€™s not their business. Itโ€™s akin to trying to compete with the service of chainlinkโ€ฆ It doesnโ€™t make much sense from an operator perspective. My bet is the market eventually figures this out- though today itโ€™s still largely misunderstood
2
3
4
379
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
Get ready, the Internet of Value is upon us.
24
52
13
335
73,315
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
PSA: Do not create network effects around restricted design space in an industry that is still early/growing/figuring it out Seems obvious, but apparently some need to hear this
2
5
456
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
Replying to @Gattacasol
AggLayer + shared sequencers
2
4
28
1,105
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
Replying to @bfarmer
@bfarmer on @Lightspeedpodhq: "@NEARProtocol will be joining the AggLayer." It'll be very interesting to see whether that jumpstarts a network effect beyond the low-hanging fruit of @0xPolygon CDK chains.
5
8
549
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
I am looking at the @Securitize's Blackrock fund (BUIDL) investment docs and it looks nothing short of... historic An actual onchain investment product by Blackrock. On Ethereum. NOT A PRIVATE CHAIN. ETHEREUM. Savour this moment, this space is the place to be
13
33
2
224
17,228
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
I was the guy who convinced Fink to tokenize on Ethereum. Our firm spent >$100M on DD, lawyers, auditors, system implementation etc I now need to tell him that a new L1 is launching this year with much higher tps and that we need to start all over again Wish me luck
1
1
1
9
681
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
if @l2beat had a documentation quality metric @0xPolygon zkEVM would be first
8
8
3
80
12,760
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
SEC losing every case versus Larry Fink filing for an ETH ETF and depositing 9 figures as a test transaction on-chain. Wonder who wins.
96
270
13
2,712
191,809
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
Replying to @jon_charb
Not impossible. It could also stay an L1 and plug into the agglayer via type1 prover.
2
5
258
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
The blobs are coming The reason 4844 exists is bc Ethereum needed to compete with other L1s, not at some point in the future, but TODAY! We couldโ€™ve waited for full danksharding but time waits for no one Same goes for fragmentation. The time is now, not when available at L1
1
2
1
4
509
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
Contrary to popular belief, Ethereum has a ton of builders leading the charge. No, they're not just a bunch of podcasters. Here's a short and incomplete list of some of the prominent Ethereum builders: L1: - @VitalikButerin - @TimBeiko - @drakefjustin - @ralexstokes - @vdWijden - @mikeneuder - @peter_szilagyi - @lightclients L2s: - @jessepollak - @CryptoIsCute - @ajwarner90 - @sgoldfed - @kelvinfichter - @dankrad - @davidesilverman - @bfarmer - @toghrulmaharram - @gluk64 Protocols / Modular: - @sreeramkannan - @13yearoldvc - @0xkydo - @PrimordialAA - @colludingnode - @JacobArluck - @musalbas - @getsqt - @dferrersan - @niraj - @KAndrewHuang - @dwr - @0xfoobar Research: - @bertcmiller - @gakonst - @samczsun - @pumatheuma - @transmissions11 Smart Contracts / Tooling: - @optimizoor - @PopPunkOnChain - @0xQuit - @fiveoutofnine - @0xmons - @0xjustadev - @emo_eth - @brockjelmore - @Amxx - @z0age There are many many more (sorry if I missed you), these are just the names that I came up with on a quick glance. Moral of the story: Ethereum has by far the largest community of builders.
62
77
13
643
84,910
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
Web3 gaming is clearly becoming the next break out category. And it wonโ€™t wane with the next bear. Weโ€™ve been building obsessively now for > 6 years; including 5 games internally - dogfooding every customer problem. Immutable zkEVM is launching out of early access imminently.
42
66
14
458
45,973
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
The obsessive simping over synchronous composability misleads the uninformed to thinking this [albeit important] edge case requirement is one that all chains should strive for It is not. This is a specified design set for a niche use case Do not get lost in twitter narratives
99.9% of applications will not need synch composability (zk aggregation will be more than sufficiently low latent). I think thatโ€™s an easy to agree on point. For the remaining .1%, you can still get synchronous/atomic composibility through shared sequencing?
1
1
1
826
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
Replying to @Smokey_
Memecoins are just airdrops in reverse Airdrop = get people to use chain, they get money Memecoin= people lose money, and it gets them on your chain
1
1
1
133
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
Replying to @cburniske
Thanks for attending my ted talk Chris And the next step after Modularization is chain aggregation
2
2
6
836
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
If I were CEO of Ethereum I wouldโ€™ve never let this happen Who is hiring?
Oh boy are my predictions coming true? All chains will go modular (including. current โ€˜integratedโ€™ ones) Ethereum could have had a massive head start, but the alignment cabal is ceding ground Still time, window is closing Donโ€™t say you werenโ€™t warned
1
5
538
PK (99.9,0.1) ๐Ÿฆ‡๐Ÿ”Š retweeted
You want access to Polygonโ€™s users? Guess what? Theyโ€™re willing to SHARE them with you. All you need to do is join the AggLayer (itโ€™s persissionless) Have at it
Replying to @binji_x
OP should use SS+Agglayer Youโ€™ll get Lens users that way & the Ethereum pie could grow together via collaboration, rather than building walled gardens and fighting over each others users ๐Ÿ˜Š
3
6
628