Parody editor of this respectful and obvious parody account
Joined August 2019
- Tweets8.9K
- Following437
- Followers1.7K
- Likes11.6K
Great to see that irresponsible dog owners who choose to keep a deadly XL Bully in their home must now do more to protect children from the reckless decision to keep a lethal killer dog.
Fantastic that the Government continues to strive to protect
mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/go…
Sam Browfan retweeted
1/4 Everyone agrees that the Fingleton Review needs to be implemented to get our nuclear costs down. Yet progress towards implementing these recommendations is stalling – more and more of them are off track.
Sam Browfan retweeted
I have designed a face optimized for female sexuality. Here he is.
I have designed a face optimized for male sexuality. Here she is.
The key findings on which it is based are:
- The highest earning escorts are slim with F cup breasts. The median sex doll has D cups.
- Across all demographics, men reliably prefer a waist-to-hip ratio of about 0.65. Sex dolls have an average waist-to-hip ratio of 0.62.
- When asked to rate bodies, men prefer a BMI of about 18. The average is 28.
- In @Aella_Girl's surveys, men prefer the faces of 28 year old women to 21 year olds.
- Men rate faces with prominent cheekbones more highly than faces with lots of buccal fat.
- Blonde women are overrepresented on the covers of women's magazines. They are even more overrepresented in Playboy centerfolds, pornography, sex doll, AI sexy lady libraries. Blonde escorts earn more. Blonde women in general earn more and so do their husbands.
- That being said, top rated faces are always framed by dark hair, not blonde hair.
Most women have never heard a frank discussion of what makes a woman sexy in their whole lives. Because men won't be honest, women have been left to pass hearsay, gossip, and marketing copy to each other.
To remedy this, I have written the first fully comprehensive guide to what men really find attractive.
ariababu.co.uk/p/feminine-se…
ALT A feminine, neotenous Wasian.
Horrified at the racism I have seen on here from Lindsay Clancy supporters in attacking the lone person of colour on the jury.
I hope we see some very fulsome apologies very soon
🚨#BREAKING: It’s been revealed the lone juror who voted to convict Lindsay Clancy of murdering her children was the jury’s only person of color, a Black man.
I note that OpenAI have not released a statement on Nature endorsing academic fraudster Jason Arday
Are they tacitly endorsing plagiarism??
Enormous intervention here from Professor Ritchie.
How did @sbaroncohen, one of the world's foremost autism researchers, fail to realise that Arday was not autistic.
A new Substack article by @Cartrarian provides very convincing evidence that Jason Arday never had autism. The article shows that:
➡️Arday never mentioned he had autism until 2018. Even in his 2015 dissertation, he merely says he had "learning difficulties."
➡️The diagnostic history Arday reported was contradictory and anachronistic. Some of the labels he claims he had as a child were rare or nonexistent at the time. Other diagnoses he claims to have had are contradictory and cannot be present in the same person.
➡️Arday also contradicted himself in discussing when he learned about his diagnosis. Sometimes he says he knew at age 3, but he also claimed to have not been told until his mid-30s.
➡️Arday didn't seem to understand what autism is. Sometimes he said it's a "hybrid" diagnosis, and at other times Arday said it was a type of other disabilities. Hhe even said it was "a kind of intellectual disability," which is absurdly wrong.
This article exposes (and refutes) new lies from Arday that were previously unnoticed (or perhaps less publicized):
➡️Arday claimed to have been in a longitudinal study that does not exist.
➡️Arday said he attended a special needs school, but it is now documented fact that he attended the mainstream Heathbrook Primary School.
➡️New discrepancies in Arday's vita.
It's a long read, but that's because Arday told a lot of lies, and Cartrarian is careful to document and debunk them. It's definitely worth reading.
cartrarian.substack.com/p/ja…
Fascinating to finally see photos of the man behind CyberLeek. Hopefully now he has been identified the authorities can prevent any further GTA VI leaks from coming out.
Sam Browfan retweeted
UK is doing well, Calgary not so much
The UK strengthened it's Breed Specific Legislation when it comes to dangerous dogs. So far this year there have been zero deaths from Pitbulls or the deadly XL Bully
Other places take the RSPCA's preferred Breed Neutral approach, with disastrous results
westernstandard.news/news/in…
The UK strengthened it's Breed Specific Legislation when it comes to dangerous dogs. So far this year there have been zero deaths from Pitbulls or the deadly XL Bully
Other places take the RSPCA's preferred Breed Neutral approach, with disastrous results
westernstandard.news/news/in…
Sam Browfan retweeted
I'm sorry, this is so absurd.
"We can't publish this story because while it's newsworthy and true, the subject might kill himself" is obviously an insane position to hold. Do just the tiniest amount of second-level thinking about what that position would logically lead to.
If Arday wants kill himself, that's on him, not on the journalists exposing his lies.
Furthermore, it's insane to see him treated like he's just a lil smol bean who never hurt nobody. Jason Arday was a bad person. He was a plagiarist and a fraud. He was a serial liar who lied about nearly every part of his life. Because of his fraud and his lies, he stole opportunities that rightfully should have gone to other academics.
What's more, when students complained he was a crappy professor, he accused them of racism! When a journalist started digging into his lies, he called the police on them! He was a bad person, and he deserved to be exposed as the fraud he was.
It's absolutely insane that anyone would suggest the people exposing his lies are somehow at fault in this situation.
BREAKING: Guardian's Katharine Viner was warned Arday was at risk - yet published anyway
Author Kelechi Okafor released a series of internal emails showing the Guardian knew how vulnerable Arday was, yet ignored warnings
thecanary.co/skwawkbox/2026/…
thecanary.co/skwawkbox/2026/…
Sam Browfan retweeted
I am bewildered, and not very impressed, by the visceral, naked, irrational hatred spat out by some defenders of Jason Arday. If a Cambridge professor is accused of being an unqualified charlatan, the accusation might be racially motivated. On the other hand it might not, depending on the evidence. The correct question to ask is not, ”What is the colour of his skin” but “Is it in fact true that he is an unqualified charlatan?” Please examine the evidence before leaping to the assumption of racism.
As for the idea that journalists “piled in on him” and “hounded him to his death”, most attacks were against Cambridge University. Jason himself was widely regarded as an unfortunate victim of foolish promotion way beyond his ability to cope. In appointing him to a professorship for which he was manifestly unqualified – in ludicrously describing him as “the best in the world” – certain senior members of the university showed a level of patronising condescension towards black people that could fairly be described as racism, while at the same time making him tragically vulnerable to such attacks as came his way.
Amazing, not only has the ban on the killer XL Bully led to reduced deaths from their vicious attacks, 2025, the first full year of the ban, saw a remarkable drop in animal cruelty incidents towards/involving the XL Bully (Source: RSPCA)
Incredibly effective policy.
Sam Browfan retweeted
This is a great piece from Sarah. The backlash against the reporting about Arday is a reminder that the attachment to free speech (even reporting quite clearly in the public interest) is worryingly thin in the UK, including among people who think of themselves as liberals.
Sam Browfan retweeted
Good post. What is truly sickening is that Arday’s suicide has gotten a lot of people off the hook who promoted him - Cambridge University, Simon & Schuster, the Good Law Project, the BBC, and many others - because of the hysterical (positive) reaction to it. It has “worked”, in a disgusting and perverse sense that will no doubt make suicide more attractive to others in future.
Incredible impressive TEDx talk from Saloni here.
Really worth a watch
It's finally here! I gave a TED talk in April in Vancouver, and it was released online today.
You can watch it here:
ted.com/talks/saloni_dattani…
I've also adapted it into an article, which was published last week: worksinprogress.co/issue/fut…
It's quite horrifying seeing the racist attitudes towards Jason Arday
Adults, regardless of their race, are responsible for their own choices
The attempt to remove Arday's agency and responsibility by blaming those who exposed his lies shines a light on a deeply racist mindset
The media's ability to speak truth to power, despite the threat of legal action plus cultural norms against questioning Arday is incredibly impressive
Brave and necessary journalism.
Sadly required due to repeat failures of academic institutions
Unfortunately there were far too many credulous media operators who had the opportunity to question Arday's implausibly extreme claims.
They failed to.
They, alongside educational establishments which promoted without due diligence, could have stopped this much earlier