𝑆𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑝ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑎 💫

The number of spineless men falling over themselves to cuck themselves out to radical feminists and score a few brownie points with the female population is truly mind-blowing. It is a testament to the collective stupidity of modern society that these beta males fail to grasp the full implications of what the Brand conviction, and any similar outcome in a case of this nature, actually means for them. To those men: Do you really, TRULY, honestly think that it could never be you? Are you actually that simpleminded? I've seen a lot of these men proudly asserting, "I've never raped anyone, so I never have to worry about being accused of rape." "It's easy to not be a rapist," they arrogantly attest from their imaginary soapboxes of presumed moral superiority. "Just don't rape people." These men are either wilfully ignorant of the broader implications, or exist in a state of such delusion that their false certainty blinds them to reality. The point about this case that the sane portion of society is trying to drive home is exactly the point they are missing. Brand denies that any of it was non-consensual. Two decades have passed. There is no physical evidence. There is no DNA. There is no CCTV. There are no first-hand witnesses. There is no digital trail. The only witnesses that exist are people told after the fact, repeating her version of events. There is nothing but her word against his. And hearsay disguised as witness testimony. He believes there was consent. She says it was rape. And ironically enough, in the single rape charge Brand was convicted of, the woman did not claim the entire sexual encounter was rape. Just parts of it. This woman is not saying, "He just came in, overpowered me, and raped me." She's saying, "I consented to tonguing his anus and giving him oral, he just did some other things afterwards I decided I didn't agree to." Again, Brand believes there was consent to all of it. Brand and his legal team also explicitly argued that several of the other allegations were fabricated, reinvented, or "reimagined." You need to pay better attention here, men who think you could never be accused like Brand. Just because YOU believe you have never raped or assaulted a woman, and that every single part of every single sexual encounter you have ever had was consensual, does not mean there isn't a woman in your past who believes differently, or who may one day allege otherwise. So what happens if a woman one day comes forward, years later, to accuse you of rape for something you barely remember, something you did that you thought she consented to, and it's just her word against yours, and you can't prove otherwise? With all her friends backing her version of events? Will your response on that day be: "It's easy to not be a rapist, just don't rape people like I did?"