Aestus Value Lab retweeted
BREAKING NEWS : Famous wallpaper app developer not impressed with flying car
Replying to @Dimistified
You don’t have even the tiniest bit of skepticism? Realism? 😅 I love tech and the future is going to be fun, but imagine if Hyundai or Audi or any other company pulled this stunt
Aestus Value Lab retweeted
“Quantum elliptic curves might break crypto’s public key cryptography.”
“No they won’t, do you know anything about cryptography?”
“No, do you?”
“No.”
Aestus Value Lab retweeted
Replying to @SJ_Swapnil_Jain
mathematicians are quietly becoming AI's unpaid proofreaders
Aestus Value Lab retweeted
Hi,
Tomorrow we are re-opening the Pro $200 subscriptions to new subscribers, but together with it we are also changing how we calculate the usage for it. In effect, if you do the math, it will net out at half the dollar in API spend compared to the old Pro $200 plan.
Now that it's said, let me explain why this is happening and why you will still get more work done than if you were on the Pro $200 subscription one month ago.
(a) We didn't want to compromise in other ways and are committing to not reintroducing the 5h limit, so that you can fully use the weekly usage when you want.
(b) On the subscription, we guarantee that over time you always get more work done and with an increasing level of quality. This means that you will continue to get more value per dollar spent as a result of models getting more efficient and us passing down the improvements in the form of API price reductions.
(c) We don't want to put an incentive on ourselves to artificially inflate the API list prices to make it look like you are getting a lot (and workaround it through discounts, etc). Instead we want to continue to both rapidly reduce prices and increase capabilities of models on the API. This week we introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna at 50% of their previous price. Over time, we see prices go low enough that it makes sense for most to buy usage as needed without there being a significant gap between what you get in a subscription and what you get in the API for a dollar spent.
(d) Tomorrow, we are adding more things to the subscription that won't draw on the usage, I won't reveal what that is yet.
I wanted to be transparent before all the big announcements tomorrow. Lots of new exciting things are coming to the subscriptions that will make it super compelling, but I wanted to make sure to share this change ahead of time so you can all understand it before we shower you with good news.
Codexingly,
Tibo
Aestus Value Lab retweeted
Polymarket might be the Berachain & Kalshi the Monad of this cycle.
Neither Polymarket, Kalshi, nor any existing player is architected to win this category long term!
Because the entire sector sold its soul to VC vanity metrics, fake volume, and engagement farming.
We traded sovereign economic hedging for regulatory arbitrage of sportbetting. (I love you @sydney_sweeney , don't hate the player, hate the game)
Hear me out.
What was promised as a truth machine has degenerated into an embarrassing, extractive circus.
> Full betrayal of the community.
> Platforms outsourced distribution to low-effort engagement cabals from the 3rd world, ICO beasts, and 2021 cycle extractor KOLs
> Wash trading, unverifiable volumes. Huge shoutout to @beniduboss for exposing the game
> Token promises that never materialize, rotating staff, public mud-slinging. How tf do you want to be taken seriously if you can't get your house in order?
There is ZERO recovery from this level of community betrayal.
Remember why Hyperliquid actually won:
Integrity
1. No predatory token promises.
2. No fake marketing tribes.
3. No investors expecting extractions
>> Just the builders and the community.
>> Just transparent points, relentless engineering, sovereign infra, and pure alignment with users.
HIP-4 won't win this either, btw. Just because the market structure is not designed for long-tail markets and you need them - but this is a different conversation.
There is a massive vacuum waiting for someone to build a platform with Unapologetic alignment with users over predatory cap tables.
The team that brings those values back is going to run away with the entire market.
Aestus Value Lab retweeted
Musk, Altman and Dario are not calling for an AI frontier slowdown because they suddenly developed morals.
Aestus Value Lab retweeted
Sportsbooks: “Please gamble responsibly.”
Also sportsbooks when you start consistently beating the closing line: “Okay maybe not THAT responsibly.” 🤬
Replying to @AestusValueLab
Funny that 10 years ago maybe 20 people in the world had access to data like this.
Now it took an idiot a couple of weeks of software develpment headaches. But we got it done.





















