Any attempt to replace a personal conscience by a collective narrative does harm to the individual and is the first step toward totalitarianism.
United States
Joined April 2022
- Tweets25.7K
- Following7.6K
- Followers7.6K
- Likes19.2K
The Soros network:
Everyone in Europe argues about the symptoms. Almost nobody looks at the plumbing: who funds the people who write the norms, litigate before the courts and set the boundaries of the debate.
Take the best-documented case: the Open Society Foundations, created by George Soros. Over a billion dollars a year. Roughly $32 billion given away since 1984. Not a single voter ever approved one of those dollars.
The model is simple and ruthless. You don't need to win an election. You fund NGOs, think tanks, legal clinics, university programs. They produce reports, train lawyers, run strategic litigation. And some of those people end up inside the institutions.
Concrete example: the European Court of Human Rights. A 2020 report found that at least 22 of the 100 permanent judges between 2009 and 2019 came from seven NGOs that are highly active before that same Court. Open Society is the main one, and it funds the other six.
The worst part: in 88 cases, 18 judges sat on the bench while the NGO they came from was the applicant, the representative or an intervening party. In any listed company, that's called a conflict of interest.
None of this is illegal. That's exactly the hack. These institutions were designed to protect themselves from governments and parties. Nobody planned for a private actor funding the entire chain: the plaintiff, the expert, the lawyer, and sometimes yesterday's colleague who is now the judge.
Same logic in Brussels: a dedicated policy advocacy institute, tens of millions flowing to NGOs at the heart of the EU, and Open Society among the largest private donors to the Council of Europe.
And the money? Soros made his fortune speculating, most famously against the British pound in 1992. But let's be precise: the foundation doesn't make money, it spends it. The return isn't financial, it's normative. Shaping the rules is worth more than any dividend.
So stop shouting "Soros" like an incantation. It gets engagement and changes nothing. The problem is structural: any billionaire, left or right, could do exactly the same thing tomorrow. Many already do.
What we should demand is rules. Full transparency on the funding of NGOs that litigate before European courts and institutions. Public declarations of interest for judges. Automatic recusal. Traceability of foreign money in lobbying.
Stop staring at the puppets. Look at the plumbing. Whoever funds the infrastructure of the debate always ends up writing its conclusions.
Leftists always cheat, because they're not democrats, their ideology is profoundly totalitarian
Breaking News: Is Brazil turning into a Banana Republic?
From a friend on the ground:
“Brazil Supreme Court Justice, Cristiano Zanin, President Lula’s former lawyer who defended him during the Petrobras corruption scandal and whom Lula himself appointed to the Supreme Court, ordered that voting across Brazil be extended by TWO HOURS!!!
Zanin is not even a member of the Superior Electoral Court (TSE), whose president was appointed by Bolsonaro. The TSE normally handles election issues.
His decision forced election authorities to suspend the vote count. The real scandal however, lies in the fact that Zanin had no legal authority to intervene, yet he did so anyway to help his buddy Lula.
The order was subsequently restricted to polling stations that had not yet closed, most likely in less developed regions where Lula tends to receive more votes.
This is a massive scandal in Brazil and goes to show that the country is nothing more than a banana republic.”
Look at this ⬇️
What does this remind you of?
🟥 Vote RED 🗳️
PAY ATTENTION, AMERICA: ESPECIALLY MICHIGAN AND TEXAS - STUDY WHAT JUST HAPPENED IN BRAZIL - THEY ARE COMING FOR OUR COUNTRY!
Brazil is following Venezuela's path, and the same terror network is already at work here.
Lula, an 80-year-old leftist who spent 580 days in prison on major Car Wash corruption convictions, just won a fourth term.
In 2021 Brazil’s Supreme Court overturned those convictions on a technicality (the original court lacked jurisdiction). It was not a finding of innocence. The convictions that made him ineligible were wiped out, allowing him to run for President again. Many of the judges Lula or his party had nominated during his earlier years in power.
Flávio Bolsonaro (Jair’s son) won the first round outright, roughly 47% to Lula’s 45%. On election day, the Supreme Court ordered a last-minute two-hour nationwide voting extension right around the scheduled 5 p.m. closing time. The justice who issued it was Cristiano Zanin - Lula’s former personal lawyer in the Car Wash cases, whom Lula later appointed to the court.
Result: Lula ~51.8%, Flávio ~48.2%.
Flávio Bolsonaro has refused to concede. He says he will not recognize the result and is seeking annulment of the runoff. He called the extension an unprecedented mid-game rule change by a conflicted justice that broke equal treatment between voters and created chaos at polling places.
Jair Bolsonaro is still locked up. He is serving a 27-year sentence for the alleged “coup” after 2022. Because of serious health problems (nearly killed in a 2018 stabbing by a Lula-type supporter, later treated for pneumonia), he is under house arrest with ongoing restrictions (ankle monitor, limits on visitors and communication). He cannot vote, run, or be free.
This is the playbook we documented in 2021.
In Venezuela a left-dominated Supreme Court paved the way for Hugo Chávez. In Brazil the court nullified the Car Wash convictions, released Lula, and put the institutions that count and certify votes under its control.
After Bolsonaro’s 2018 win, it acted as the opposition, censoring critics, investigating supporters, and blocking efforts to make the electronic voting system auditable.
The same Marxist and Islamic networks are already operating in America and they are celebrating this.
George Soros and the groups he funds, along with progressive NGOs, activist judges, and left-wing operatives, spend heavily to reshape courts, prosecutors, and rules. Candidates like Talerico in Texas and Abdul in Michigan fit the model: the same institutional-capture playbook that just locked in another Lula term in Brazil.
They do not need to win every argument with voters. They change the machinery so ordinary people lose control.
Brazil is the preview. Read the 2021 RAIR Foundation article “Brazil Under Attack.”
Vote. Show up. Organize. Do not wait.
Read here: rairfoundation.com/brazil-un…
Of course Ursula 🤝 Lula as they're both corrupt neomarxist globalists 🤬
Communists don't give up power once they have seized it.
Bukele said it clearly: "If you don't impeach corrupt judges, you CANNOT reform the country. They will form a cartel (a judicial dictatorship) and block all reforms."
Brazil has just shown it live. The Supreme Court annulled Lula's corruption convictions on procedural grounds. The same court sentenced his main rival, Jair Bolsonaro, to 27 years in prison, after the electoral court had already barred him from running. Yesterday, Lula won a fourth term.
France has practiced it for decades, maybe more subtly and discreetly – though in 2013, a left-wing magistrates' union was caught with a "wall of idiots" in its offices: photos of right-wing politicians pinned up for mockery.
Universal suffrage only makes sense if the last word belongs to the elected – not to a network of irremovable magistrates who interpret the rules according to their own interests.
Without real removal of political judges, elections remain theater.
The cartel stays in place.
Now imagine Poland, where our judiciary is in total continuity from communist times. A military judge of martial law later presided over a chamber of the Supreme Court of supposedly free Poland. The methods are more subtle now, of course – these people are smart – but the results are the same.
And just for good measure, look at who eagerly congratulated the corrupt Lula straight away: Ursula von der Leyen. Birds of a feather recognize each other at first sight.
It tells us a lot about Ursula and Lula alike…
That would be great, but I've watched the latest Alice Weidel interview (leader of the Alternative for Germany) with the Economist, and she started describing Remigration as something that would deport a few of the worst criminals who are last minute illegal migrants too 🤦
But is Remigration possible? 🤔
Angela Merkel DELIBERATELY facilitated the destruction of Germany.
Mass migration is the problem,
not capitalism,
not Elon Musk,
not social media algorithms.
Our HIGH TRUST society is gone.
Women are scared to go out alone.
High-skilled Germans are leaving en masse.
We @Deu_Kurier demand REMIGRATION.
