علی باقری معاون دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی: 🔹 خالد بن سلمان وزیر دفاع عربستان، ژنرال عاصم منیر فرمانده ارتش پاکستان و ابراهیم کالین رئیس دستگاه اطلاعاتی ترکیه در سفر به تهران در نشستی مشترک حضور خواهند داشت.

«آزاد» آزاد شد. توضیحات بیشتر به‌زودی… گفت‌و‌گوی بعدی: عباس امانت و یرواند آبراهامیان | ۲۸ مرداد و درس‌هایی برای ایران امروز

US is prepared for long stand-off with Iran, says Trump envoy ft.trib.al/4HgY6Qd

Breaking: Four influential regional powers from the Muslim world and three major European powers are set to meet in a first ever single diplomatic format in Istanbul as Pakistan's DPM and Foreign Minister @MIshaqDar50 is all set to travel for the meeting which will be on Friday, per sources. Foreign Ministers of R-4(Regional 4 Muslim Countries) comprising of Pakistan, Turkiyei, Saudi Arabi and Egypt are All set to Meet Foreign Minister of E-3(European Three Countries) Comprising of UK, France and Germany. Quite of a significant diplomatic development of between two regional alliances.

"Renewed military conflict before or after the midterms won’t resolve the disputes the United States and Iran will eventually have to confront across the negotiating table," writes Ali Vaez. time.com/article/2026/10/21/…

Washington and Jerusalem Have Learned the Wrong Lessons from Their Wars with Iran I regret to say that neither the United States nor Israel appears to have learned the most important lessons from their previous military campaigns against Iran. Five realities must be understood before launching another war: 1. Iran will not surrender. Even a far more intense and destructive military campaign, including strikes against critical energy infrastructure, is unlikely to force Tehran into capitulation. The Iranian leadership will not simply abandon its nuclear ambitions or ballistic missile program under military pressure. If anything, another war could further strengthen its determination to preserve these capabilities. 2. Washington and Jerusalem cannot dictate the duration of the war. Anyone who believes another military campaign can be limited to a few days is making a dangerous assumption. Iran's response is likely to be extensive and violent, potentially forcing the United States and Israel to launch additional strikes. Once this cycle begins, controlling the pace, scope, and duration of the conflict will become extraordinarily difficult. 3. There is no military silver bullet. Striking Iranian infrastructure, including energy facilities, will not magically resolve the Iranian challenge. On the contrary, such attacks could trigger massive Iranian retaliation against energy infrastructure across the Middle East, with devastating regional and global consequences. 4. Iran will have surprises of its own. American and Israeli planners should not assume that Tehran will respond only with missiles and drones. Iran could attempt to disrupt undersea communications cables, conduct unconventional operations, or even launch limited ground operations against vulnerable targets in Kuwait or Bahrain. These are potential scenarios, not certainties, but they cannot be dismissed. Moreover, another confrontation could rapidly become a regional war, with Hezbollah, Iraqi Shiite militias, and the Houthis likely to join the fighting in one form or another. The assumption that a war against Iran can remain geographically contained is deeply questionable. 5. The global economic consequences could be severe. Another major conflict would almost certainly put substantial upward pressure on global energy prices, particularly if Iranian energy facilities were targeted and Tehran retaliated against Gulf energy infrastructure. The consequences would extend far beyond the Middle East, affecting global markets, inflation, and economic stability. The bottom line is simple: Without a return to a diplomatic agreement, another military escalation in the Gulf increasingly appears difficult to avoid. But that does not mean another war would achieve its strategic objectives. Even a highly destructive campaign targeting Iran's most critical infrastructure may fail to produce meaningful strategic gains. Instead, the United States and Israel could find themselves trapped in another prolonged war of attrition, with no decisive outcome, mounting economic costs, and an increasingly unstable Middle East. The fundamental lesson of the previous campaigns should be clear: Military superiority does not automatically translate into strategic success. Before launching another war, Washington and Jerusalem must answer a basic question: What exactly can another military campaign achieve that the previous ones failed to accomplish, and what is the exit strategy if Iran refuses to back down? There is no kinetic solution to the Iranian challenge. Ignoring that reality risks repeating the same strategic mistakes, only at a much higher cost. #Iran #iran

🇮🇱🇮🇷📡U.S. officials said the Israelis knew that Iran's air defense systems would detect the sortie 🇮🇱🇺🇸🛩Israel notified the U.S. in advance & described the operation as a training exercise intended for "power projection" & aimed at deterring Iran ahead of the elections