Muslim

Joined March 2023
Highest forms of intelligence: 1. Obsession 2. Game theory 3. Pattern recognition 4. Delusional optimism 5. Admitting you’re wrong
170
1,630
49
15,018
340,356
This is wild. Probably the most comprehensive peptide library I’ve seen to date. Worth a look for anyone interested in the space!!
We're thrilled to announce the Superpower Peptide Library. Every peptide, mapped to the body. 152 peptides, from approved drugs to compounds still in trials, sorted by where they act. Each one has its own page, reviewed by a physician and fully cited, covering: - the evidence and how strong it is - its FDA status - it's mechanism of action - what studies in humans have found Because not all peptides are equal. Semaglutide is FDA-approved. BPC-157, maybe the most talked-about peptide for recovery and repair, is not. In a 2025 review of its research, 35 of 36 studies were in animals or the lab. Know the science before you buy the hype. Check it out here: superpower.com/guides/peptid…
42
345
3
6,046
567,896
the japanese side of X is a gold-mine.
バイブコーディング
61
603
5
10,362
279,797
POV: you realize bro just dropped the secret to becoming hyper successful in life:
4
170
2
2,062
114,190
Hindu liberals who are so critical of Sharjeel and labelling him as an extremist, radical Islamist; if they were even half the amount critical of radical Hindutva terrorism that has captured our country over the last 12 years, we wouldn’t be in such a dire position as we are today. but that happens for a reason. it comes from their majoritarian lens of looking at things because that’s their default setting no matter how much they try to appear “secular.” in a Hindu majoritarian country, it is okay for them for Hindus to assert their religious identity, which has ended up giving way to Hindutva. it is not okay, however, for a Muslim to assert his religious identity, because at the end of the day, he is a minority and he should know his place. Sharjeel wasn’t liked as much as Umar even before the recent article came out and the whole discourse around him started. anybody who has read him in fact knows his stance has been consistently clear. he is not apologetic in demanding a fair representation of Muslims which the constitution has failed to give. he doesn’t invoke Gandhi and Nehru in his speeches, in fact, he is critical of them. this is something unacceptable for the Hindu liberal class. a good Muslim for them is an atheist who carries a Muslim name or someone who doesn’t assert his religious identity or criticise the historical majoritarian Hindu leaders who helped shape this country. the fact that they’re absolutely rattled about Sharjeel without ever engaging with his work also reeks of Islamophobia.
2
86
4
291
4,117
im gonna be deadass, this video is the reason i've been sleeping better
The Effort Paradox 🤔 (explained)
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This text is copied word for word from an earlier post by @balnkets quoting the same video. x.com/balnkets/statu…
56
2,546
39
68,433
2,511,198
शरजील इमाम की पुरानी वीडियो कटिंग कर वायरल किया जा रहा है, इन्हें आतंकवादी, मुस्लिम कट्टरपंथी, देश विरोधी का धब्बा लगाया जा रहा है, जबकि उनका फुल वीडियो ये है, लेकिन कोई संघ इसे नहीं दिखाएगा!!
91
334
8
924
22,003
just leaving for the record.
32
29
11
224
8,426
तू टकले तड़ीपार का पाला हुआ कुत्ता है! और तेरे जैसे लाखो संघी कुत्ते कांग्रेस में शुरू से रहे हैं इसीलिए कांग्रेस का ये हाल हुआ है! Sharjeel Imam is a much better Indian who speaks for the marginalized people of India unlike the TRAITORS like you! और आगे से किसी भी बिहारी के लिए इज़्ज़त से बात कर नहीं तो बढ़िया से सिखा दिया जाएगा
This quoted post is unavailable.
123
71
21
319
23,225
Petr Yan refuses to be friends with Merab Dvalishvili after bringing politics into fight build-up: "He tried to make it not about sport, you know? He tried to bring politics... We are just little people, we live quietly, unnoticeably." Via: @dc_mma
64
161
14
5,640
199,177
Everyone claims to speak for democracy, until a Muslim raises questions that disturb the political consensus.
39
235
5
872
8,057
Yeh bhadwe congressi hum loog ko secularism, minority rights etc. ka lecture dete. Fucking hypocritical bhadwas. Inti Islmophobic bhadwagiri peel di, basic right to fair trail bolna bhool gaya yeh fatherchod. Exactly why do Muslims vote for a shit-hole party like Congress ...???
This quoted post is unavailable.
32
71
4
361
20,791
Game theory teaches: never enter a game you haven’t studied. Never show your hand before the money is on the table. And never play to be liked. Play to build so much leverage that the rules eventually stop applying to you entirely. Most people lose not because they are outworked but because they are outplayed. They do not understand the game they are in, they reveal too much too soon and they care more about approval than position. Learn the game first. Move quietly. Build until you have enough leverage to write your own rules.
Get addicted to neuroplasticity, subconscious reprogramming, delusional optimism, game theory, quantum physics, cognitive biases, systems thinking, epigenetics, and first-principles thinking. I promise it will change your life.
35
1,035
18
7,808
186,828
WE MIGHT BE LOOKING AT THE GREATEST TWITTER ACCOUNT IN HISTORY FOR HEALTHCARE
When I was 13, I lost my mom to breast cancer. I still wonder if it could have been prevented. When she found the lump, she did everything right. She went to her primary care doctor, and he told her it was nothing. My mom wasn’t convinced, so she went to a women’s health specialist for a second opinion and was told the same thing. A year passed before she saw a third doctor who was shocked that nothing had been done and ordered tests the same day. By the time she was diagnosed, the cancer had already spread. For the next three years, she went through chemo, surgery, and radiation. Specialist after specialist, asking the same questions again and again. After she passed away, there were two thoughts I couldn’t out of my head: (1) Somewhere, a doctor must have seen a case like my mom’s and caught it early. (2) Nothing that doctor learned had any way to reach her. Healthcare runs in my family. All four of my sisters are nurses or pharmacists, and my fiancée spent the pandemic working in a multi-organ transplant recovery ward. I’ve seen how hard clinicians work, and how much of that work requires understanding the patient and recognizing patterns from past cases. That’s why a doctor can practice for 30 years and get better every year, while a hospital can treat millions of patients without getting much better at treating the next one. What’s missing in healthcare is the infrastructure for it to learn from its own experience. If we don’t examine the cause and outcome of every interaction, how do we get better at knowing which signs to watch for? I spent years at Google and Upwork building AI from human expertise, then eventually left big tech to work on the one problem I couldn’t stop thinking about. I started a company called Concurrence (@concurrencehq) and raised $24M to build data and AI systems that enable healthcare orgs to learn from every patient they treat. Nothing learned is lost, and it reaches the next patient who needs it. We’ve already supported care for over 10 million patients worldwide. My mom deserved a doctor who had seen her case a thousand times. Every patient does.
4
29
1
517
59,671
This is what Sharjeel Imam warned Indian Muslims about. There is no bigger hypocritical party than Congress in India. It needs Muslims to remain fearful enough to keep voting for it but never strong enough to negotiate on equal terms. Congress has always presented itself 1/5
This quoted post is unavailable.
19
110
4
414
13,652
A Stanford professor just explained how ChatGPT and Claude are actually built better than anyone. most people still think there's some magic inside the model. Bookmark this before you forget. > how text gets turned into numbers > why "predict the next word" is the whole game > what the loss actually measures > what the model adjusts during training, step by step useful whether you've never touched an LLM or you use Claude every day. after this, every new model release makes sense. free, full lecture. find it below ↓
Sam Altman right now
9
67
1
387
129,631
(1) Sharjeel Imam advocated only “Chakka Jam” & disrupting railway, yet he is anti-national (2) George Fernandes, accused in the CBI chargesheet of plotting dynamite blasts targeting many railway tracks, later came to power, case withdrawn, & became Railway & Defence Minister.🤡
11
109
5
401
8,164
OK...... why the fuck did I just do this and it worked..... I mean come the fuck on I can't today....
We live inside a gigantic quantum computer…and I can prove it 🤯
246
769
30
12,909
1,826,973
The lived reality of generations of Muslims is a legitimate source of knowledge about the Indian state. The moment a Muslim names his religion, his community, and the structural violence visited upon them, he is transformed by a kind of ideological alchemy into an "Islamist " What the label ultimately demands is a deracinated Muslim subject a subject who has been stripped of his particularity, who speaks in the universal language of the majority, who accepts the terms of the social contract without naming its exclusions. The demand that Muslims perform this mask is the demand that they consent to their own erasure. Sharjeel Imam refuses the mask. He speaks as a Muslim, from a Muslim community, about the violence visited on that community. . There is a further problem with the "Islamist" label it is applied by those who occupy a very different social position from the one being described. Those who applies such labels are almost invariably, a member of the majority upper caste Hindu, English-speaking, middle or upper class who has never had to prove his loyalty, never had his patriotism questioned, never been told that his religion is a security threat. This is a position of privilege. Sharjeel Imam cannot be labelled an Islamist simply because he asserts his identity and religion
Mr Gupta like many others needs to understand the vantage point Sharjeel coming from. And need to ask themselves why this discomfort with Sharjeel's politics. I'd like to remind them of a few things: 1. Sharjeel is not just a political activist but also a researcher and student of History. And as a scholar and intellectual he is well within his rights to give a different interpretation of history. A critique of the constitution is well within the rights of all citizens of this country. 2. Sharjeel @_imaams interpretation is coming from being a member of a minority community and he articulates the lived reality of generations of Muslims in our country. We probably need to ask ourselves if the reason it makes us so uncomfortable is because there is truth in his ideas? Why can't people treat Muslim rights as a universal, human rights issue? Why is Sharjeel being hounded as an Islamist when he is talking about human values but in the context of a certain community? The concept of a standpoint theorization should not be such a surprise to anybody who understands critical thinking. #SharjeelImam
26
35
6
119
5,634