johnny retweeted
You're saying you know that Matthew - Revelation can be known because the Israelites canonized the Old Testament Scriptures?
Does that line up with the Historical record regarding the canonization of NT Scripture?
Also, you did not address how you know the first book of the NT is Matthew? How do you know his name? Please show me in the NT where the author gives his name. My point is. You don't know from Scripture, because Scripture does not tell us that. Just as Scripture does not list a canon of books. The knowledge is extrabiblical.
So you do recognize religious Tradition and sources outside of the Bible.
Also, what I am trying to get at is the written NT documents function as liturgical writings intended for the Church’s public worship, especially the Eucharist (the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass), and the Bible itself uses “New Testament/covenant” language primarily for that sacramental reality rather than for a collection of books.
Luk 22:19 And taking bread, he gave thanks and brake and gave to them, saying: This is my body, which is given for you. Do this for a commemoration of me. 20 In like manner, the chalice also, after he had supped, saying: This is the chalice, the new testament in my blood, which shall be shed for you.
δειπνησαι λεγων τουτο το ποτηριον η καινη διαθηκη εν τω αιματι
The Eucharist is the New Testament.
The Bible is a liturgical document for prayer and worship. The Word of God is not merely a book.
John 1:14 And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us...
Jesus Christ is the Word made flesh.
You may want to think about it in prayer and in depth the meaning of these things, and that the Holy Spirit works through His Holy Church.
2Peter 1:20 Understanding this first: That no prophecy of scripture is made by private interpretation. :21 For prophecy came not by the will of man at any time: but the holy men of God spoke, inspired by the Holy Ghost.
1Tim 3:15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.
johnny retweeted
THE CHURCH FATHER WHO WROTE THIS IN 107 AD AND IT SILENCES EVERY PROTESTANT ARGUMENT
St. Ignatius of Antioch was a student of the Apostle John. He was arrested and sent to Rome to be eaten by lions.
On the way, he wrote seven letters. In 107 AD, within living memory of the Apostles, he wrote:
“Where the bishop is, there let the multitude of believers be; even as where Jesus is, there is the Catholic Church.” (Letter to the Smyrnaeans, 8:2)
This is the first recorded use of the term “Catholic Church” and it comes from a man who personally knew the Apostle who leaned on Jesus’ chest at the Last Supper.
He also wrote:
“Take note of those who hold heterodox opinions… They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ.”
Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. The Catholic Church by name. Obedience to bishops in apostolic succession.
107 AD. Not the Council of Trent. Not the Middle Ages.
The next time someone tells you the Catholic Church invented these doctrines centuries later, show them Ignatius.
He wrote this on the way to die for it.
johnny retweeted
Scott Hahn: “The ‘New Testament’ was a SACRAMENT—the Eucharist—before it became a DOCUMENT—ACCORDING TO THE DOCUMENT. Jesus said ‘Do this’—not ‘Write this’. My own study made me see the only way I could really be a New Testament Christian is by becoming a Eucharistic Catholic.”
How weak and pusillanimous of a Christian must one be to block for answering someone’s question?
Guitar guy needs your prayers.
Blocked. I wonder why?
She wants to be a Bible scholar and tell us all what to believe but refuses to answer to a simple question regarding Paul’s letter to Timothy.
“But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence.” (1 Tim 2:12)
It won’t matter unless they return to the faith and start having large families again.
The UK just deployed a political weapon it's only used once before in modern history.
And nobody is talking about what it just backfired into.
🚨 🚨 🚨 KEIR STARMER BANNED FOREIGN JOURNALISTS FROM ENGLAND TO STOP A RALLY → IT PRODUCED THE LARGEST ANTI-GOVERNMENT MARCH IN YEARS 🚨 🚨 🚨
The Home Office issued entry bans on 11 foreign nationals ahead of the 16 May 'Unite the Kingdom' rally in central London. Rebel News founder Ezra Levant. Multiple journalists. Commentators. Banned from the country. To stop a march.
Metropolitan Police deployed 4,000+ officers. Live facial recognition. Drones. Dogs. Horses.
The result: tens of thousands — some estimates reaching hundreds of thousands — flooding the streets of London anyway.
THE WEAPON:
→ UK Home Office entry bans — 11 foreign nationals barred from the country
→ Prime Minister publicly labeled the rally "extremist" and "hatred and division"
→ Starmer framed it as "a battle for the soul of our nation" in direct pre-rally statements
→ Police mobilized at a scale typically reserved for state visits or terror threats
→ Live facial recognition deployed across central London
→ Rival pro-Palestine march simultaneously permitted on the same day
→ Metropolitan Police prepared for 50,000 — the actual crowd exceeded preparation
→ Government rhetoric amplified international media attention across the US and Europe
THE TARGET:
→ A march organized around "national unity, free speech, and Christian values"
→ Organized weeks after Reform UK seized 1,350+ council seats and control of 13 councils in the 8 May local elections
→ Reform's gains came primarily at Labour's direct expense — Essex, Sunderland, council after council
THE MATH:
→ Reform UK: 1,350+ seats gained in a single election cycle
→ 13 councils flipped — including Essex with 42 seats
→ Starmer's response: ban journalists, deploy 4,000 officers, call the march extremist
→ Outcome: the bans became the story, the march became a symbol, and the streets filled anyway
Read that again.
💀 Every ban Starmer issued handed organizers a government-censorship narrative
💀 Every officer deployed turned a political rally into a national confrontation
💀 The suppression didn't shrink the movement — it advertised it
⚠️ Reform just proved it can win elections. The march proved it can also fill streets.
⚠️ Starmer called it "a battle for the soul of our nation" — and then lost the visual battle on live television
⚠️ This isn't a fringe moment. This is what a political realignment looks like in the streets.
They're showing you the arrests and the police lines.
They're NOT showing you what this sequence actually means — a government that just lost 1,350 council seats in one night responded to the aftermath by banning journalists and calling a march extremist, and the streets answered with the largest visible opposition mobilization in years.
You don't ban foreign journalists to stop a fringe event. You ban foreign journalists when you're afraid of what the footage will show. And you only deploy 4,000 officers with drones and facial recognition when you already know the crowd is going to be too large to ignore.
Process that.
Most people won't see this. RT to change that. 🔥
I'll keep you updated as this unfolds, turn on notifications this is EXTREMELY important.
1 Thessalonians 2:14 For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea, in Christ Jesus: for you also have suffered the same things from your own countrymen, even as they have from the Jews: 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men; 16 Prohibiting us to speak to the Gentiles, that they may be saved, to fill up their sins always: for the wrath of God is come upon them to the end.
