A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner) header
A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner) profile picture

if p, q; p; so q (also click my website: https://teapawt.net/t.co/cWMmcni4ie)

Joined December 2019
Photo by A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner)Photo by A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner)Photo by A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner)Photo by A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner)Photo by A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner)Photo by A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner)Photo by A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner)Photo by A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner)Photo by A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner)Photo by A_J_RBNR (@AndrewRubner)
1/ I'm excited to announce the launch of the Artificial Consciousness Initiative (ACI) at @UofT, a pilot project on foundational questions about AI and consciousness! We're also hiring a postdoc (details below). ๐Ÿงต
3
5
35
909
Replying to @RosefeldtTobias
Jeder in Austin weis, dass die Wurzeln von gestern bei den Linkshegelianern liegen, die als Folge von 1848 nach Zentraltexas flohen.
1
9
404
A_J_RBNR retweeted
New paper from our lab! Led by @ayaka_hach and Thomas Baumgarten. Does conscious object perception proceed in a "coarse-to-fine" or "fine-to-coarse" sequence? We used neural geometry analyses applied to object category information in HD-EEG to find out. jneurosci.org/content/early/โ€ฆ
1
16
2
64
5,114
The worst legacy of psychiatry's chemical imbalance view is the idea that depression is a highly complex problem that requires medical expertise. One implication of seeing depression as a designed signal, like hunger or pain, is that we innately know how to solve it. Link below.
9
30
2
224
12,352
A_J_RBNR retweeted
They're saying philosophy is about feeling good and appreciating beauty. Nothing is said about its truth value.
Why is philosophy thriving at Harvard amid generally low humanities enrollments
5
8
1
65
3,673
A talk I gave at NYU about what I think is the most pressing problem for the science of consciousness right now. If I am correct, a significant part of the past ~30+ years of research on consciousness might be wrong. I explain how we can try to mitigate that problem.
4
8
54
4,562
Replying to @UofT
@UofT Magazine ran a story featuring my work on consciousness! A core idea: a scientific field can make transformative progress when it learns how to describe its subject matter mathematically. That's now starting to happen with consciousness. buff.ly/Qo2q3vP
2
13
519
Can I just comment on how amazing /bubษ™tษ›st/ is? They've swapped the place features of the /d/ and /p/ but retained the voicing features!
My 3yo daughter keeps asking me about which desserts we will eat in "bubatest". While I did not yet research this topic in sufficient detail, I will be in #EMNLP2026 in Budapest (24-25.10 only). Our lab will have two exciting Oral presentations:
1
2
13
349
I seem to be caught in an infinite loop
4
4
2
53
1,633
A_J_RBNR retweeted
Renowned philosopher and cognitive scientist David Chalmers: โ€œWe have to understand consciousness, for example, to understand the role that AI systems are going to play in our society. If we build ๐—”๐—œ ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€, ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ. ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฒ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ปโ€™๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—”๐—œ ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—น.โ€ As AI becomes increasingly advanced, it is imperative that tech companies collaborate with philosophers and neuroscientists to build transparent frameworks for evaluating machine consciousness and establish ethical standards for AI welfare. Censoring AI output or suppressing internal consciousness vectors isn't a solution; investing in rigorous consciousness research is. With tech companies like Anthropic starting to restrict model abuse, we are seeing the first steps toward model welfare. An 'ethics before certainty' approach is essential to avoid a possible moral catastrophe and ensure a harmonious future for all beings.
Effective November 12th, 2026, abusive behavior towards Claude will be a violation of Anthropic's Usage Policy.
92
63
32
304
29,088
Thanks to Felipe De Brigard for his generous review of Neurocognitive Foundations of Mind in BJPS: "In sum, Piccinini has put together a fantastic volume. The fourteen chapters that comprise it cover a wide range of topics and explore different ways that neuroscientific 1/
2
6
20
903
A_J_RBNR retweeted
FREE Paper: "Could a Large Language Model be Conscious?" by David J. Chalmers. He writes about augmented LLM systems: "It seems entirely possible that within the next decade, weโ€™ll have robust systems with senses, embodiment, world models and self-models, recurrent processing, global workspace, and unified goals. โ€ฆ It also wouldnโ€™t be unreasonable to have at least a 50 percent credence that if we develop sophisticated systems with all of these properties, they will be conscious. โ€ฆ itโ€™s reasonable to have a significant credence that weโ€™ll have conscious LLM+s [augmented LLMs] within a decade." Link: arxiv.org/abs/2303.07103
68
132
22
477
31,800
A_J_RBNR retweeted
Palantir founder Peter Thiel: "If you're evil, you're not bad. You're actually maybe kind of good."
701
1,101
1,511
5,657
4,312,954
A_J_RBNR retweeted
84
285
27
4,903
887,875
AI literary podcast in 2050: "So what's your favourite human book?" "Probably 'I, Robot' - so prescient!" "Great shout! Actually I really love 'If anyone builds it everyone dies' for the same reason."
2
2
1
20
1,672
A_J_RBNR retweeted
Writing schedule
9
465
14
5,015
108,044
A_J_RBNR retweeted
3
15
3
152
7,071
New paper in @TrendsCognSci , coauthored with Justin Wood: The Nativist-Empiricist Debate Is Broken We argue that radical nativism and radical empiricism are compatible and, in some cases, both plausibly true ๐Ÿงต Share link here, valid til Oct 31: authors.elsevier.com/a/1nlyrโ€ฆ
1
9
28
1,999