Strategic Plans Division, NCA. Views my own.

Islamabad, Pakistan
Joined October 2010
At #INC2026 in Islamabad, SVI set four. My short answers: 1. Compellence. "Bharat cannot compel Pakistan." Turning an unverified allegation into war, while reserving the decision to strike, doesn't work. 2. Limited war. "The defender also has a vote, and Pakistan can again cast it decisively." Restraint is responsible statecraft, but "restraint is not endlessly renewable." 3. Entanglement. India's dual-capable missiles, precision strike, canisterisation, MIRVs, missile defence and sea-based forces are converging. "That is a shift from stability by fear to instability by confidence." 4. Technology. BrahMos brings all three risks together. "Radar cannot reveal payload or intent." Meaningful human control must stay central to military AI. The conclusion: "South Asia is a nuclear flashpoint and here the true enemy is the belief in useful war." Full speech in the reply. I first set out the BrahMos argument in my CISS essays and the wider frame in my FRS paper (link below). #SouthAsia #NuclearDeterrence Reply 1: Full session (my speech from 27:28): youtube.com/watch?v=GAylfaPx… Reply 2: FRS paper: frstrategie.org/web/document…
2
12
6
54
1,995
Very well articulated essay exposing India's maritime ambitions while neglecting necessary safety protocols, and pushing for an uncalled for arms race in the region.
1
2
47
India’s expanding nuclear navy and continuous at-sea deterrence are quietly escalating risks in South Asia, casting further doubt on its "No First Use" pledge. In a highly nuclearised environment, the delusion of a controlled conflict is the greatest threat. Do not forget that "there is no space for war under nuclear overhang." #Pakistan #indian #India #Nuclear #Deterrence #War
India's nuclear navy is the quiet escalation in South Asia. In June 2026, @SIPRIorg estimated 12 Indian warheads deployed at sea for "occasional deterrence patrols." That estimate is too low, and it arrives seven years late. Modi announced INS Arihant's first deterrence patrol in November 2018. A concealed, ready launch platform means something different when it sits beside counterforce ambitions, missile defence and talk of pre-emption. NCA Adviser Lt Gen (Retd) Mazhar Jamil told IISS on 13 October that continuous at-sea deterrence further weakens the credibility of India's no-first-use pledge, and that unannounced SLBM tests raise the risks of misperception and escalation. May 2025 showed there is no safe band of war on land or in the air. There is none at sea. In the Subcontinent, the true enemy is the delusion that war can be kept safely on a lower rung. As Field Marshal Asim Munir put it, there is no space for war in a nuclearised environment. My piece in @dawn_com: dawn.com/news/2039724/the-nu… #SouthAsia #NuclearDeterrence #IndianOcean #SSBN
6
9
179
India's nuclear navy is the quiet escalation in South Asia. In June 2026, @SIPRIorg estimated 12 Indian warheads deployed at sea for "occasional deterrence patrols." That estimate is too low, and it arrives seven years late. Modi announced INS Arihant's first deterrence patrol in November 2018. A concealed, ready launch platform means something different when it sits beside counterforce ambitions, missile defence and talk of pre-emption. NCA Adviser Lt Gen (Retd) Mazhar Jamil told IISS on 13 October that continuous at-sea deterrence further weakens the credibility of India's no-first-use pledge, and that unannounced SLBM tests raise the risks of misperception and escalation. May 2025 showed there is no safe band of war on land or in the air. There is none at sea. In the Subcontinent, the true enemy is the delusion that war can be kept safely on a lower rung. As Field Marshal Asim Munir put it, there is no space for war in a nuclearised environment. My piece in @dawn_com: dawn.com/news/2039724/the-nu… #SouthAsia #NuclearDeterrence #IndianOcean #SSBN
1
8
2
24
779
The onus of breakdown will be on the Bharat strategy of hegemony.
1
4
1
10
213
Zahir Kazmi retweeted
Want to know Pak's position... Listen to his speech at #INC2026. A powerful breakdown of escalation risks, strat instability & emerging mil techs in S. Asia — & a clear message: regional stability comes from credible deterrence, not illusions of limited war.
At #INC2026 in Islamabad, SVI set four. My short answers: 1. Compellence. "Bharat cannot compel Pakistan." Turning an unverified allegation into war, while reserving the decision to strike, doesn't work. 2. Limited war. "The defender also has a vote, and Pakistan can again cast it decisively." Restraint is responsible statecraft, but "restraint is not endlessly renewable." 3. Entanglement. India's dual-capable missiles, precision strike, canisterisation, MIRVs, missile defence and sea-based forces are converging. "That is a shift from stability by fear to instability by confidence." 4. Technology. BrahMos brings all three risks together. "Radar cannot reveal payload or intent." Meaningful human control must stay central to military AI. The conclusion: "South Asia is a nuclear flashpoint and here the true enemy is the belief in useful war." Full speech in the reply. I first set out the BrahMos argument in my CISS essays and the wider frame in my FRS paper (link below). #SouthAsia #NuclearDeterrence Reply 1: Full session (my speech from 27:28): youtube.com/watch?v=GAylfaPx… Reply 2: FRS paper: frstrategie.org/web/document…
1
3
108
Zahir Kazmi retweeted
"Let me be clear: Bharat cannot compel Pakistan. Turning an unverified allegation into war while reserving the decision to strike doesn’t work." @ArmsConAdvisor
At #INC2026 in Islamabad, SVI set four. My short answers: 1. Compellence. "Bharat cannot compel Pakistan." Turning an unverified allegation into war, while reserving the decision to strike, doesn't work. 2. Limited war. "The defender also has a vote, and Pakistan can again cast it decisively." Restraint is responsible statecraft, but "restraint is not endlessly renewable." 3. Entanglement. India's dual-capable missiles, precision strike, canisterisation, MIRVs, missile defence and sea-based forces are converging. "That is a shift from stability by fear to instability by confidence." 4. Technology. BrahMos brings all three risks together. "Radar cannot reveal payload or intent." Meaningful human control must stay central to military AI. The conclusion: "South Asia is a nuclear flashpoint and here the true enemy is the belief in useful war." Full speech in the reply. I first set out the BrahMos argument in my CISS essays and the wider frame in my FRS paper (link below). #SouthAsia #NuclearDeterrence Reply 1: Full session (my speech from 27:28): youtube.com/watch?v=GAylfaPx… Reply 2: FRS paper: frstrategie.org/web/document…
2
2
135
Ours are short wars, but short is not safe. India may start a crisis; it cannot reserve the response, escalation or termination. "It's an illusion that war can be started low, kept low, and stopped on command." #INC2026
1
5
90
Comprehensive, Spot on and thought provoking analysis. Anyone interested in South Asian peace and stability must listen to it. #Pakistan #Nuclear #Strategy #Stability #War #India @StimsonCenter @ACDC_ISSI @UNIDIR @UN_Disarmament @SIPRIorg @IISS_org @CarnegieEndow
At #INC2026 in Islamabad, SVI set four. My short answers: 1. Compellence. "Bharat cannot compel Pakistan." Turning an unverified allegation into war, while reserving the decision to strike, doesn't work. 2. Limited war. "The defender also has a vote, and Pakistan can again cast it decisively." Restraint is responsible statecraft, but "restraint is not endlessly renewable." 3. Entanglement. India's dual-capable missiles, precision strike, canisterisation, MIRVs, missile defence and sea-based forces are converging. "That is a shift from stability by fear to instability by confidence." 4. Technology. BrahMos brings all three risks together. "Radar cannot reveal payload or intent." Meaningful human control must stay central to military AI. The conclusion: "South Asia is a nuclear flashpoint and here the true enemy is the belief in useful war." Full speech in the reply. I first set out the BrahMos argument in my CISS essays and the wider frame in my FRS paper (link below). #SouthAsia #NuclearDeterrence Reply 1: Full session (my speech from 27:28): youtube.com/watch?v=GAylfaPx… Reply 2: FRS paper: frstrategie.org/web/document…
2
7
101
Replying to @ArmsConAdvisor
@ArmsConAdvisor delivers a powerful message at #INC2026: "In nuclear South Asia, no war is truly limited, and no escalation is without consequences. Strategic wisdom lies in preventing war, not believing it can be controlled." #StrategicStability #SouthAsia #NuclearRisk
At #INC2026 in Islamabad, SVI set four. My short answers: 1. Compellence. "Bharat cannot compel Pakistan." Turning an unverified allegation into war, while reserving the decision to strike, doesn't work. 2. Limited war. "The defender also has a vote, and Pakistan can again cast it decisively." Restraint is responsible statecraft, but "restraint is not endlessly renewable." 3. Entanglement. India's dual-capable missiles, precision strike, canisterisation, MIRVs, missile defence and sea-based forces are converging. "That is a shift from stability by fear to instability by confidence." 4. Technology. BrahMos brings all three risks together. "Radar cannot reveal payload or intent." Meaningful human control must stay central to military AI. The conclusion: "South Asia is a nuclear flashpoint and here the true enemy is the belief in useful war." Full speech in the reply. I first set out the BrahMos argument in my CISS essays and the wider frame in my FRS paper (link below). #SouthAsia #NuclearDeterrence Reply 1: Full session (my speech from 27:28): youtube.com/watch?v=GAylfaPx… Reply 2: FRS paper: frstrategie.org/web/document…
7
12
164
Zahir Kazmi retweeted
A compelling analysis at #INC2026, highlighting the growing risks of escalation, strategic instability, and emerging military techs in #SouthAsia. A timely reminder that lasting regional stability rests on credible deterrence, not illusions of limited war. #NuclearDeterrence
At #INC2026 in Islamabad, SVI set four. My short answers: 1. Compellence. "Bharat cannot compel Pakistan." Turning an unverified allegation into war, while reserving the decision to strike, doesn't work. 2. Limited war. "The defender also has a vote, and Pakistan can again cast it decisively." Restraint is responsible statecraft, but "restraint is not endlessly renewable." 3. Entanglement. India's dual-capable missiles, precision strike, canisterisation, MIRVs, missile defence and sea-based forces are converging. "That is a shift from stability by fear to instability by confidence." 4. Technology. BrahMos brings all three risks together. "Radar cannot reveal payload or intent." Meaningful human control must stay central to military AI. The conclusion: "South Asia is a nuclear flashpoint and here the true enemy is the belief in useful war." Full speech in the reply. I first set out the BrahMos argument in my CISS essays and the wider frame in my FRS paper (link below). #SouthAsia #NuclearDeterrence Reply 1: Full session (my speech from 27:28): youtube.com/watch?v=GAylfaPx… Reply 2: FRS paper: frstrategie.org/web/document…
1
3
114
After a 7.0-magnitude earthquake struck Nagqu in Xizang last night, rescue teams sprang into action right away, with relief supplies following close behind. May everyone in the affected area stay safe. 🙏
136
136
20
1,220
34,546
A state assuming that a conventional war can be separated from nuclear escalation is a critical strategic failure. In classical military strategy, building a defense posture entirely on the assumption that an adversary will respect an arbitrary boundary, violates the fundamental rule of preparing for worst-case scenarios. Therefore the belief that under all circumstances war can be kept below the nuclear threshold is the real threat to the world peace. @ciss_ajk @ArmsConAdvisor #Disarmament #War #nuclear #strategy
Crimson Tide: in the nuclear world, the true enemy is war itself. In a nuclear dyad: the real enemy is the belief that war can be kept safely on a lower rung. That is the belief that makes the unthinkable look controllable. youtu.be/7_7Khp85YVA?si=6ijb…
8
9
367
The nuclear submarine Novosibirsk successfully hit a naval target over 170 km away with an Onyx missile and a target on Kamchatka over 1,200 km away with a Kalibr missile.
54
669
19
4,073
96,866
Crimson Tide: in the nuclear world, the true enemy is war itself. In a nuclear dyad: the real enemy is the belief that war can be kept safely on a lower rung. That is the belief that makes the unthinkable look controllable. youtu.be/7_7Khp85YVA?si=6ijb…
1
1
13
664
Pakistan at the UN First Committee (9 Oct): India launched an “unprovoked military assault” last year and now claims a right to strike “at a time of its choosing.” Pakistan’s delegate: “The notion that a limited conventional war can be fought and contained under a nuclear overhang is a dangerous delusion.” This isn't restraint — it’s a recipe for catastrophe between two nuclear-armed states. The world can't afford India’s “new normal” of strikes under a nuclear shadow. #PakistanAtUN #FirstCommittee #NuclearOverhang #SouthAsia #Disarmament #UNGA81 #StrategicStability #Pakistan
10
1
18
519
Arms control was the hidden plumbing of world order. Nobody celebrated it. It kept the house from flooding. That plumbing is now torn out. INF is gone. New START has lapsed. The lesson others are learning is corrosive: restraint is for the weak 1/2 thenews.pk/print/1441198-the… @ArmsControlWonk @KomissarWhipla @IISS_org @BulletinAtomic
2
14
1
25
624
The young people who say they are growing up without a map to navigate today’s world deserve an honest answer: Maps are not discovered. They are drawn by those who turn up. The choice is not order or disorder. It is an order designed by a few, or one negotiated by many! thenews.pk/print/1441198-the… @RadioactiveFrnd @bttn_quetta @CISS_Islamabad @ciss_ajk @CISSS_Karachi @SVI_Pakistan
6
11
104
What is being lost is not stability in one theatre. It is a shared expectation of what states will not do. AI, hypersonics and offensive cyber compress crises from days to minutes. A rules-based order that bends for partners and binds everyone else is not an order. The choice is not order versus disorder. It is an order designed by a few, or one negotiated by many. Two alternates, for different rooms: For those who share rules language more readily than arsenal arithmetic: A rules-based order must apply its rules to everyone, or it is not an order at all. INF is gone. New START has lapsed. Exemptions keep being granted for convenience. The system is teaching a simple lesson: restraint is for the weak. 2/2 Read “On the disorder between orders”: thenews.pk/print/1441198-the…
1
1
8
118
Zahir Kazmi retweeted
“India and Pakistan have also struck each other’s territory, despite the fact that both are nuclear-weapons states.” Yes. The evidence from that singular conflict, and, perhaps more importantly, from lessons learnt since, are far from unidimensional and shared across both sides.
Opinion: The weakening of Russian deterrence has global implications — and they are not all positive. ft.trib.al/y5RGS2V
1
5
186