Replying to @carbonphysicsai
sike! gimme the mic, hope your miners go on strike
I'll take all ya fuckin' oxygen, deregistered on sight
JUST IN: Alpha holders don't want teams to sell owner emissions to support the growth of their own investment because it's "sell pressure".
To all owners, please do what you need to do, don't worry about the larps
To the extractors, as always, go hug yourself 🙂
Emission decay would gradually reduce a subnet’s emissions as it matures, unless it offsets that decay by returning value to holders. New subnets get runway, while expectations rise over time.
Imagine two subnets with the same alpha price and the same emissions.
One returns 30x more value to holders.
Should both keep receiving their full allocation three years in?
The image follows them from launch to year three under my emission decay proposal. Same starting point, very different funding outcomes.
Follow the payouts and $TAO burns as they mature 👇



