wolf in sheeps clothing
it's comical to see how much effort that vicious scammers like @MartaVerse @moneytaura @AureaLuma go into to defend their public image so they can keep stealing money from innocent, naively ambitious people.
it's every single classic scammer playbook:
- change name
- dodge every credible argument with an evasive answer
- block everyone that asks a valid question (soooo many people have been blocked, it's hilarious)
- gaslight
there is no shortage of evidence showing how disingenuous she is, and no evidence suggesting that she is a successful trader, nor qualified to be giving ANY paid advice, let alone for $15000
idk how people can feel sympathy, tread lightly or defend these shameless, money-hungry retards who'll go to no lows to take money from honest people.
these scammers intentionally prey on the ambitious, semi-new trader who think endless theory knowledge will help pass them to profitability
the same as moneytaur, who can't even allow tags unless you pay
if you're still falling for these larps then i promise you, you are never gonna make it
..... $15000!!!!!!
even at her other consultation rate of $350, you could spend less money to see a qualified psychiatrist & pay for guidance from a VERIFABLE TRADER.... why would you pay to someone who can't even give you a single piece of evidence that they take money out the markets?
bare in mind, it's SO easy to fake a PnL, so easy to fake an equity curve, so easy to fake exchange numbers, not hard even to fake myFXbook profiles (as some of the bigger, more obvious larps flashing APs do)....
so you'd hope that at MINIMUM, the person you're paying can have a public track record of successful trades? or that they've really been trading for more than a few years? or that they weren't rugging a couple years back?
study @SaroTrades who has an X profile full of tips on how to spot these vicious LARPs
or go ask an AI about larpaverse if ur too lazy to do your own research into her track record before paying lmao
just stop being so naive and falling for people like this
unavailable
Alright, not cool to blast him because he got a couple recent calls wrong after having many correct ones.
However, I hope the recent lack of foresight and getting "hacked" humbled the man a bit.
Perhaps disassociate from larps next...
Replying to @Bobonacci_X @Moneytaur_
I don't agree that the original MT was a grifter. I learned a lot from him and it has helped me a lot. However, i'm not convinced it's still the same person running his account. He's still making good $ for doing almost nothing with subs so there's no point in deliberately...
Bobonacci retweeted
Replying to @AureaLuma
The amount of contradictions in your post is wild.
You refuse to take part in "pissing contests" after multiple comparisons to others (golden boys, 1-minute scalpers, bad teachers, etc, etc).
You say that you came here to tell us about YOU after pulling MT into this whole thing with you, using his lack of logs to justify your own lack of transparency.
You say you have proved enough over the years (exempting yourself from any form of current proof) but also state that regardless of your stats it would never be good enough.
You say you never ask anyone to speak for you (which shouldn't even be necessary) out of putting others' privacy over your ego, but are willing to introduce prospects to people who will (same testimony, just somewhere it can't be checked).
And the most vile part…
You send "love and hugs" to your "haters" right before you portray the people asking questions as misogynists and shame anyone asking as though they'd insulted their own mother.
teapawt.net/AureaLuma/status/21006… yap yap yap but don't show proof you are profitable
unavailable
Bobonacci retweeted
Replying to @chartsMovesNews
Everyone should leave this community of cucks and take the cult leader’s name out of their bio. His trading method has no statistical edge btw.
Bobonacci retweeted
Replying to @AureaLuma @HTMariusS
@MoneyTaura hey Marta, as a well wisher and as someone who doesn’t involve himself in drama, my honest thoughts -
You gotta stop shilling your mentorship (15k!!) time and time again without producing the proof of you being profitable. It’s not a good look on the MT community and truth be told, people within the community don’t really like it and are fed up of it as it’s an insult to Moneytaur himself. Most of your posts aren’t very useful for you to keep shilling your content/mentorship. Apologies if that came across as rude but that’s how most people genuinely feel about you within the community.
Bobonacci retweeted
Replying to @chartsMovesNews
@MoneyTaura this is you my friend. I completely agree with CMN and Barn
Just show proof of being profitable. Oh wait, you can’t.
You say you don’t share proof because you are not anon, etc… but you publicly charge $15k for a mentorship - isn’t this contradictory?
I really hope no one falls for your shit.
Some of the mentorship pitches on here are getting ridiculous....
If you’re charging people to teach them how to make money, I think proving that you can do it consistently is a pretty reasonable starting point.
I went through the X posts behind one of these pitches. There’s plenty of confidence, charts and student messages. What I couldn’t find in the material reviewed was a complete, independently verified track record showing actual returns and drawdowns.
When asked for yearly results and maximum drawdown, the response was to keep personal financials private and talk about an annual target. Fair enough on privacy. But a target tells me what you want to make. It doesn’t tell me what you made, how much you risked or how ugly the losing periods got.
Then there’s the suggestion that the teaching can set someone up to keep making money indefinitely, and the confidence that the next trade will recover a losing period. That’s a hell of a lot of certainty without the record to back it up.
You can do everything right and still take another L. Your confidence doesn’t decide what the market does next.
The trade posts need the same scrutiny. I found a long idea that got a brief bounce, followed by a claimed BE exit and a later post discussing possible follower losses. That’s exactly why I want to see how the trade was managed in real time. A level on a chart doesn’t tell a follower when you actually entered, moved your stop or got out.
Some calls worked and losses have been acknowledged. I’m not going to pretend otherwise. But a collection of posts about wins, losses and recoveries still doesn’t tell me the net result over a meaningful period.
Same with hindsight charts. Drawing a high RR move after it happened doesn’t show that you took it. It can be useful teaching material. On its own, it doesn’t verify a live entry, exit or account return.
Student messages also need context. How many students took part? What happened to the people whose results aren’t being advertised? The seller has acknowledged that some stopped trading. A few positive messages don’t establish what a typical paying student gets.
I don’t need someone to be perfect. I need the claims to match what can actually be checked.
Personally, the public record I reviewed gives me no basis to pay for this mentorship on the strength of the earnings pitch. Before asking people to hand over money, show a properly verified record, the drawdowns, representative student results and exactly what you’re teaching.
Charging for education is fine. Selling that education with more certainty than your evidence supports deserves to be called out.
Some of you probably know who I’m talking about. If they want to challenge this, I’ve kept the original posts and links. We can go through the claims and the follow-ups in full context, indefinitely if needed.
The amount of unverified expertise being sold on X is getting ridiculous. If you want people to hand over serious money for a mentorship, back your earnings pitch with a track record they can actually check. If there’s a verified record I’ve missed, show it. Until then, I haven’t seen enough in the public evidence to justify paying for that pitch.
Earn the credibility before asking for the money.
Follow the #CapiChronicles for a verified track record lol.
Just now seeing the whole thing with @IamZeroIka and am honestly not surprised. He was the best of these three, in terms of not being completely intolerable, but still, something never sat right with me.
I had multiple drafts over the last couple years that I ultimately decided not to post, but I guess I should have. The fact he never engaged with me, positively or negatively, was a red flag.
Even ignoring all the @moneytaur stuff, there were plenty of posts he had on KAS that you guys tagged me in or linked one of my analyses that he never acknowledged.
The one in particular that got me fully onboard with my skepticism was the 5c KAS post. I had a whole thing written up basically calling it out, but I decided to give him the benefit of the doubt. Mistake.
Everything about that post was suspicious... including and especially this reply (teapawt.net/IamZeroIka/status/1988…).
Quoting a post that references a post that doesn't exist (a classic), probably to jump on a train that looked like it had merit (whether it was the Wyckoff moron or that weirdo Lars who started it, idk). Talking about the likelihood of new cycles highs while using a macro model of... distribution.
In general, just citing 5c as way more important than it was, especially at that stage and point in the cycle. Saying 12c was more than feasible was actually stupid and entirely tone deaf to the state of the market and the holders.
The one that sent me completely overboard though was the follow up post (teapawt.net/IamZeroIka/status/1994…) where he claimed things were going according to plan lol
Zones around 3.6c on the chart popping up out nowhere, no mention of them previously. No mention of 3.6 at all in any previous posts actually, yet the perfect long. Still expecting higher while BTC was already in the midst of a macro bearish shift, just because: wyckoff model...?
All signs of piggybacking on something that's not fully understood in an environment not fully grasped.
(To be fair, I don't know anything that was going on in his private groups. Maybe updates were made that weren't shared publicly, however it wouldn't negate 99% of the issues brought to light here.)
I had a draft absolutely ripping him for this post that I wish I put out there. Oh well, the deeds are done.
There's a reason I said I liked Pheonix the most. He was honest about not knowing much and then you could see the learning and implementation take place.
The rest of these bums I've already called out for basically doing the complete opposite; acting like they've had it all figured out and only they have the secrets. Well, we all know by now the ones I call out usually turn out to be guilty, in one way or another, in the end.
I'm sure you're beginning to see, as I have, the start of the 'enlightening' on Moneytaur and his nonsense. I tried to tell him you can't build up that big a pile of bullshit and not expect it to topple over eventually.
Anyway, I used to feel bad for saying I should have a portion of these guys followings, if not just for a more diverse outlook for everyone. Turns out it just would've been straight up better for the whole space.
If you're a follower of Zero who's been let down by this in some way, I invite you to follow me instead. I have no more shame in saying I deserve a much larger following and hope you can see why.
If you disagree with anything I've said, we can talk and I'll probably convert you. If you're just gonna insult and name call because you're still too brainwashed, have fun. I'll still be here when you snap out of it. 🤍
You know the problem? Everyone is way too comfortable lying with easily finable evidence available to anyone interested in finding it.
There's a certain wyckoff guy, a certain zero guy, and a certain Master guy who are all claiming things now that are in contrast to what they've said in the past, and I have the evidence to prove it.
At least Phoenix stated his plan and stuck to it. That's all you can ask for.
Bobonacci retweeted
Replying to @AureaLuma @AndreiTipa60931
You are an anon who the F are u to even remotely think you are someone 😂😂😂😂😂
Nobody knows you.
There is people with a lot of financial resource showing their trades or PNL and they don’t write a movie about why they don’t show PNL
This is what LARPs do when asked for their performance. @MoneyTaura had the chance to rekt me here, it was on a silver platter. Imagine paying 20k for a yapping LARPer.
It's Saturday, shouldn't she be with her kid? The life of "millionaires" is arguing with retards on twitter 🤣
teapawt.net/MoneyTaura/status/2093…
You absolute retard, all you have to do is post your YTD %
It's not that deep. It can be with 1k or 100k or 1M. But you don't trade.
unavailable
Do not pay this hag 20k, or even just 2k for her mentorship. It's all a scam. Her mentees are broke and rekt, they just use this marketing to open their discord and telegram groups. It's a ponzi.
unavailable
You're a scammer @HenrikZeberg , I still remember your WIF targets. before going after others, look in the mirror, you fucking fraud.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Bobonacci retweeted
Replying to @TresCommasXRP
dude haven't you noticed that his posts literally make these 2 assets move short term bc of the buying of his followers? It's always the same thing. They have low volume so it doesn't take much to pump them. And Cred can print some free money in the futures market
There isn't a single honest actual trader here. Engagement farming, LARPs, gaslighters, ego farmers. This space is toxic beyond belief.
Bobonacci retweeted
Replying to @TraderDune @mr_abundance_
Now you turn off your comments and block replies from your followers asking about what I said here lol.
Ignoring me just how you ignored me in your DMs months ago when I asked about you faking clients and brokerage screenshots.
Another Zero Ika? If you have no made up story is easy to defend yourself. 🤷🏼♂️
Losers and scammers put their tail between their legs and run away.
Replying to @TraderDune @mr_abundance_
called out, comments locked
called out again, now gotta lock the profile
classic





















